canonical matrix
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

20
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 015-028
Author(s):  
Darlena Darlena ◽  
Ari Suparwanto

If the characteristic polynomial of a linear operator  is completely factored in scalar field of  then Jordan canonical form  of  can be converted to its rational canonical form  of , and vice versa. If the characteristic polynomial of linear operator  is not completely factored in the scalar field of  ,then the rational canonical form  of  can still be obtained but not its Jordan canonical form matrix . In this case, the rational canonical form  of  can be converted to its Jordan canonical form by extending the scalar field of  to Splitting Field of minimal polynomial   of , thus forming the Jordan canonical form of  over Splitting Field of  . Conversely, converting the Jordan canonical form  of  over Splitting Field of  to its rational canonical form uses symmetrization on the Jordan decomposition basis of  so as to form a cyclic decomposition basis of  which is then used to form the rational canonical matrix of


Symmetry ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junsheng Duan ◽  
Lian Chen

In this paper, solutions for systems of linear fractional differential equations are considered. For the commensurate order case, solutions in terms of matrix Mittag–Leffler functions were derived by the Picard iterative process. For the incommensurate order case, the system was converted to a commensurate order case by newly introducing unknown functions. Computation of matrix Mittag–Leffler functions was considered using the methods of the Jordan canonical matrix and minimal polynomial or eigenpolynomial, respectively. Finally, numerical examples were solved using the proposed methods.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Isabel García-Planas ◽  
Tetiana Klymchuk

AbstractTwo complex matrix pairs (A, B) and (A′, B′) are contragrediently equivalent if there are nonsingular S and R such that (A′, B′) = (S−1AR, R−1BS). M.I. García-Planas and V.V. Sergeichuk (1999) constructed a miniversal deformation of a canonical pair (A, B) for contragredient equivalence; that is, a simple normal form to which all matrix pairs (A + A͠, B + B͠) close to (A, B) can be reduced by contragredient equivalence transformations that smoothly depend on the entries of A͠ and B͠. Each perturbation (A͠, B͠) of (A, B) defines the first order induced perturbation AB͠ + A͠B of the matrix AB, which is the first order summand in the product (A + A͠)(B + B͠) = AB + AB͠ + A͠B + A͠B͠. We find all canonical matrix pairs (A, B), for which the first order induced perturbations AB͠ + A͠B are nonzero for all nonzero perturbations in the normal form of García-Planas and Sergeichuk. This problem arises in the theory of matrix differential equations ẋ = Cx, whose product of two matrices: C = AB; using the substitution x = Sy, one can reduce C by similarity transformations S−1CS and (A, B) by contragredient equivalence transformations (S−1AR, R−1BS).


PRIMUS ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-256
Author(s):  
Jeremy Sylvestre
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 110-116 ◽  
pp. 3047-3053
Author(s):  
Satish S. Kadam ◽  
S. G. Joshi

— In this paper thirty nine factors responsible for the dynamic loosening, under soft foot condition, of a bolted joint have been enumerated and its Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) has been developed. In this systematic approach of ISM, first of all a concept model of the problem has been formulated, followed by the formulations of Structural Self-Interaction Matrix (SSIM) and Reachability Matrix. The level of significance of each factor has been derived by level partitioning. The initial digraph is prepared on the basis of the canonical matrix. ISM based model is finalized after checking for conceptual inconsistency and necessary modifications. The MICMAC analysis is also conducted with the help of driving and dependence diagram, which states that factor 31 (vibration loosening) and 36 (additional stresses in the bolt) are the major threat for joint integrity and needs more attention.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanasios A. Pantelous ◽  
Athanasios D. Karageorgos ◽  
Grigoris I. Kalogeropoulos ◽  
George Venkov ◽  
Ralitza Kovacheva ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document