contrast agent bolus
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (19) ◽  
pp. 6905-6918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manil D Chouhan ◽  
Alan Bainbridge ◽  
David Atkinson ◽  
Shonit Punwani ◽  
Rajeshwar P Mookerjee ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1229-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Stenzel ◽  
Matthias Rief ◽  
Elke Zimmermann ◽  
Johannes Greupner ◽  
Felicitas Richter ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Xu ◽  
Xiao Liu ◽  
Ang Li ◽  
Yubo Fan ◽  
Anqiang Sun ◽  
...  

One assumption of DSC-MRI is that the injected contrast agent is kept totally intravascular and the arterial wall is impermeable to contrast agent. The assumption is unreal for such small contrast agent as Gd-DTPA can leak into the arterial wall. To investigate whether the unreal assumption is valid for the estimation of the delay and dispersion of the contrast agent bolus, we simulated flow and Gd-DTPA transport in a model with multilayer arterial wall and analyzed the bolus delay and dispersion qualified by mean vascular transit time (MVTT) and the variance of the vascular transport function. Factors that may affect Gd-DTPA transport hence the delay and dispersion were further investigated, such as integrity of endothelium and disturbed flow. The results revealed that arterial transmural transport would slightly affect MVTT and moderately increase the variance. In addition, although the integrity of endothelium can significantly affect the accumulation of contrast agent in the arterial wall, it had small effects on the bolus delay and dispersion. However, the disturbed flow would significantly increase both MVTT and the variance. In conclusion, arterial transmural transport may have a small effect on the bolus delay and dispersion when compared to the flow pattern in the artery.


2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karsten Sommer ◽  
Regine Schmidt ◽  
Dirk Graafen ◽  
Hanns-Christian Breit ◽  
Laura M. Schreiber

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regine Schmidt ◽  
Dirk Graafen ◽  
Stefan Weber ◽  
Laura M. Schreiber

Contrast-enhanced first-pass magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in combination with a tracer kinetic model, for example, MMID4, can be used to determine myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). Typically, the arterial input function (AIF) required for this methodology is estimated from the left ventricle (LV). Dispersion of the contrast agent bolus might occur between the LV and the myocardial tissue. Negligence of bolus dispersion could cause an error in MBF determination. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of bolus dispersion in a simplified coronary bifurcation geometry including one healthy and one stenotic branch on the quantification of MBF and MPR. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were combined with MMID4. Different inlet boundary conditions describing pulsatile and constant flows for rest and hyperemia and differing outflow conditions have been investigated. In the bifurcation region, the increase of the dispersion was smaller than inside the straight vessels. A systematic underestimation of MBF values up to −16.1% for pulsatile flow and an overestimation of MPR up to 7.5% were found. It was shown that, under the conditions considered in this study, bolus dispersion can significantly influence the results of quantitative myocardial MR-perfusion measurements.


Author(s):  
C.A. McKenzie ◽  
R.S. Pereira ◽  
F.S. Prato ◽  
Z. Chen ◽  
D.J. Drost

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document