Specifics of prescribing menopausal hormonal therapy in patients with the anamnestic endometriosis

Administration of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in patients with genital endometriosis (GE) is a controversial issue requiring a patient-personalized approach. Current principles for MHT selection and prescription in patients with anamnestic endometriosis are presented, which are based on the guidelines of the International Menopause Society (IMS), The European Menopause and Andropause Society, local and foreign publications retrieved from electronic data bases PubMed, Cyberleninka. The data of our study on observing 724 patients with GE treated with diverse MHT types were presented and analyzed (428 women in perimenopausal period, 296 in postmenopausal period). Patients with endometriosis in perimenopausal and postmenopausal periods showed more prominent manifestations of climacteric and post-ovariectomy syndromes, as well as high risk of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) due to repeated surgery on the ovaries and preceding long-term “antiestrogen therapy”. Custom-compounded MHT based on components combinations, dosage and administration route provides a significantly improved quality of life for patients with endometriosis, prevents loss of BMD and reduces risk of cardiovascular diseases. Using low and ultra-low dose estrogen bioidentical to natural substances in this patient group minimizes a risk of disease recurrence.

The estrogen pathway as a modulator of response to immunotherapy

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with a 5-year survival rate of about 18%. Thus, there is a great need for novel therapeutic approaches to treat non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes for a subset of patients, especially those with high programmed death-ligand 1 expression and/or high tumor mutational burden, but have failed in the majority of patients. Increasing evidence suggests that the estrogen signaling pathway may be a therapeutic target in metastatic NSCLC and that the estrogen pathway may play a role in sex-based responses to ICIs. This report will review the epidemiologic, preclinical and clinical data on the estrogen pathway in NSCLC, its implications in sex-based responses to ICIs and the potential use of antiestrogen therapy in combination with ICIs.

CLINICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CASE OF I NTRA-PULMONARY METASTASES OF BENIGN LEIOMYOMA

Uterine leiomyoma is rarely accompanied by the detection of distant metastases, including lungs. The basis of modern strategies of diagnosis of metastatic leiomyoma is the carrying out incisional or excisional biopsy of identified lesions with the subsequent performance of the immunohistochemical studies. Taking into account the indolent course of the disease, in modern practice, the main tactics of management of such patients is a long-term follow-up with the appointment of antiestrogen therapy.

Do Women With Breast Cancer Who Choose Adjunctive Integrative Oncology Care Receive Different Standard Oncologic Treatment?

Purpose: To determine if women with breast cancer who choose adjunctive naturopathic oncology (NO) specialty care receive different standard oncologic treatment when compared with breast cancer patients who receive only standard care. Participants: Women with breast cancer stages 0 to 4, aged 18+ who spoke English and sought care from outpatient naturopathic doctor clinics were enrolled in an observational study of clinical and quality of life outcomes. Women who sought NO care 2 or more times within the first 2 years postdiagnosis were identified as NO cases. A matched comparison group of breast cancer patients were identified using the Western Washington Cancer Surveillance System(CSS). Methods: A longitudinal cohort design. In addition to self-report data, the CSS provided data on demographics, stage at the time of diagnosis, and initial treatment. Oncology medical records were abstracted in order to provide additional information on standard oncologic treatment for all participants. Results: Cohorts were well matched with regard to demographic, histologic, and prognostic indicators at the time of diagnosis. Approximately 70% of women in both cohorts received standard oncologic care that met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. There were no statistically significant differences between the cohorts in treatment received. Fewer women in the NO cohort with estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer appear to have received antiestrogen therapy. Conclusions: Women in both cohorts appear to receive guideline-concordant care. However, women who receive adjunctive NO care may be less likely to receive antiestrogen therapy.