concurrent control group
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

15
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

10.2196/22146 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. e22146
Author(s):  
Diego Garcia-Huidobro ◽  
Solange Rivera ◽  
Sebastián Valderrama Chang ◽  
Paula Bravo ◽  
Daniel Capurro

Background As the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted medical practice, telemedicine emerged as an alternative to outpatient visits. However, it is not known how patients and physicians responded to an accelerated implementation of this model of medical care. Objective The aim of this study is to report the system-wide accelerated implementation of telemedicine, compare patient satisfaction between telemedicine and in-person visits, and report provider perceptions. Methods This study was conducted at the UC Christus Health Network, a large private academic health network in Santiago, Chile. The satisfaction of patients receiving telemedicine care in March and April 2020 was compared to those receiving in-person care during the same period (concurrent control group) as well as in March and April 2019 (retrospective control group). Patient satisfaction with in-person care was measured using the Net Promoter Score (NPS) survey. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine was assessed with an online survey assessing similar domains. Providers rated their satisfaction and responded to open-ended questions assessing challenges, strategies used to address challenges, the diagnostic process, treatment, and the patient-provider relationship. Results A total of 3962 patients receiving telemedicine, 1187 patients from the concurrent control group, and 1848 patients from the retrospective control group completed the surveys. Satisfaction was very high with both telemedicine and in-person services. Overall, 263 physicians from over 41 specialties responded to the survey. During telemedicine visits, most providers felt their clinical skills were challenged (61.8%). Female providers felt more challenged than male providers (70.7% versus 50.9%, P=.002). Surgeons, obstetricians, and gynecologists felt their clinical skills were challenged the least, compared to providers from nonsurgical specialties (P<.001). Challenges related to the delivery modality, diagnostic process, and patient-provider relationship differed by provider specialty (P=.046, P<.001, and P=.02, respectively). Conclusions Telemedicine implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic produced high patient and provider satisfaction. Specialty groups perceived the impact of this new mode of clinical practice differently.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Garcia-Huidobro ◽  
Solange Rivera ◽  
Sebastián Valderrama Chang ◽  
Paula Bravo ◽  
Daniel Capurro

BACKGROUND As the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted medical practice, telemedicine emerged as an alternative to outpatient visits. However, it is not known how patients and physicians responded to an accelerated implementation of this model of medical care. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to report the system-wide accelerated implementation of telemedicine, compare patient satisfaction between telemedicine and in-person visits, and report provider perceptions. METHODS This study was conducted at the UC Christus Health Network, a large private academic health network in Santiago, Chile. The satisfaction of patients receiving telemedicine care in March and April 2020 was compared to those receiving in-person care during the same period (concurrent control group) as well as in March and April 2019 (retrospective control group). Patient satisfaction with in-person care was measured using the Net Promoter Score (NPS) survey. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine was assessed with an online survey assessing similar domains. Providers rated their satisfaction and responded to open-ended questions assessing challenges, strategies used to address challenges, the diagnostic process, treatment, and the patient-provider relationship. RESULTS A total of 3962 patients receiving telemedicine, 1187 patients from the concurrent control group, and 1848 patients from the retrospective control group completed the surveys. Satisfaction was very high with both telemedicine and in-person services. Overall, 263 physicians from over 41 specialties responded to the survey. During telemedicine visits, most providers felt their clinical skills were challenged (61.8%). Female providers felt more challenged than male providers (70.7% versus 50.9%, <i>P</i>=.002). Surgeons, obstetricians, and gynecologists felt their clinical skills were challenged the least, compared to providers from nonsurgical specialties (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). Challenges related to the delivery modality, diagnostic process, and patient-provider relationship differed by provider specialty (<i>P</i>=.046, <i>P</i>&lt;.001, and <i>P</i>=.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Telemedicine implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic produced high patient and provider satisfaction. Specialty groups perceived the impact of this new mode of clinical practice differently.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 46-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Milano ◽  
Shelly Heimfeld ◽  
Ivy B. Riffkin ◽  
Ian Nicoud ◽  
Frederick R. Appelbaum ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Myeloablative cord blood transplant (CBT) recipients experience delayed hematopoietic recovery and an increased risk of transplant related mortality (TRM). With the primary goal of generating increased numbers of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) to supplement a conventional cord blood (CB) graft and thereby enhance engraftment and reduce early TRM, we have developed methods to ex vivo expand CB-derived HSPC in the presence of Notch ligand for 14 days. The product is then harvested and cryopreserved for future clinical use. We have previously reported that infusion of non-HLA matched, off-the-shelf ex vivo expanded CB progenitor cells in patients undergoing myeloablative CBT is safe and associated with faster neutrophil (ANC) recovery. We now present updated outcomes data with a median follow-up of 3.2 years (range 1.9-3.7). Methods: Between September 2010 and August 2012, 15 patients with hematologic malignancies were enrolled in this single center Phase I trial to assess the safety of infusing a non-HLA matched expanded CB HSPC product to augment conventional CBT. Conditioning consisted of Fludarabine (75mg/m2), Cytoxan (120mg/kg) and TBI (13.2 Gy). On the day of transplant, 1 or 2 unmanipulated CB units were infused first followed 4 hours later by infusion of the expanded CB product. Donor(s)/host chimerism studies were performed weekly from day 7 to 28, then at days 80, 180 and 1 year on peripheral blood flow sorted into myeloid and lymphoid fractions. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and MMF beginning on day -3. ANC and platelet engraftment were calculated using cumulative incidence rates to accommodate competing risks. Disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: The median age was 21 years (range, 5-45) and weight 59 kg (range, 23-89). Other patient characteristics and median infused cell doses are shown in Table 1. Four patients (26%) received only 1 unmanipulated CB unit along with the expanded graft. All patients engrafted at a median of 19 days (range, 9-31 days), significantly faster than the 25 days (range, 14-45) observed in 41 recipients of two unmanipulated units otherwise treated identically (p=0.01) (Figure 1A).Similar to our initial expansion trial using partially HLA-matched expanded CB cells, early (day 7) myelomonocytic (CD33 and CD14) recovery was almost entirely (98–100%) due to cells arising from the expansion product. Cells derived from the expansion product were no longer detected at day 14 in all but 2 patients. The median time to platelet recovery (>20 x 10^9/L) was 35 days (range 21–45).The cumulative incidence of platelet recovery by day 100 was significantly higher than that observed in our concurrent control group 92% (CI 95%: 59-99) vs. 69% (95%: 51-81), respectively (p=0.005) (Figure 1B). The probability of 3-year DFS was 86% (95% CI, 57-97). No TRM was observed throughout the study period (Figure 1C), although 2 patients relapsed at days 53 and 219 posttransplant and subsequently died after further therapy. All patients presented with grade II acute GVHD at a median time of 32 days (14-86), with no grade III-IV aGVHD observed (Figure 1D). The skin was the most commonly affected organ (n=12). Eight (53%) patients were treated for pre-engraftment syndrome at a median time of 6 days (range 4-9) and five (33%) patients had GVHD after day 100. At 2 years only 2 patients are still on immunosuppressive therapy for mild chronic GVHD. Conclusions: The results of this Phase I safety study demonstrated that infusion of an off-the-shelf non-HLA matched expanded CB HSPC product to augment a CB graft in the myeloablative setting was safe and led to more rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery compared to our concurrent control group. Importantly, no TRM was observed among the 15 patients on this study, with only 2 deaths due to relapsed disease, leading to an excellent OS of 86% at a median follow-up of 3.2 years. Quite interesting is the observation of no grade 3-4 acute GVHD, even with infusion of a non-HLA matched expanded cell product that may induce increased alloreactivity of the unmanipulated CB unit(s). However, in this preliminary pilot study, it appeared that infusion of the non HLA-matched product was associated with less severe acute GVHD. Based on these very promising results, a prospective multicenter randomized trial utilizing this product is underway. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sexual Health ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Buhrer-Skinner ◽  
Reinhold Muller ◽  
Petra G. Buettner ◽  
Rose Gordon ◽  
Joseph Debattista

Background To assess a mailed self-collection kit for chlamydia testing as an intervention to increase post-treatment retesting rates. Methods: This prospective intervention study took place at a sexual health clinic in Townsville, North Queensland (Australia) between 2006 and 2008. The intervention consisted of offering to mail a self-collection kit for retesting 3 months after treatment. The achieved retesting rates were compared to those from the previous year and to concurrent controls who did not participate in the intervention. Both control groups received standard advice on retesting. Results: Of the 46 participants in the intervention group, 34.8% returned the sample for retesting 3 to 4 months after initial treatment, in comparison to 6.8% of the historic control groups (n = 206) and 1.4% of the concurrent control group (n = 142) (P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Retesting rates for Chlamydia trachomatis were substantially and significantly improved using the mailed self-collection kit evidencing that the kit could deliver a much needed intervention to improve notoriously low retesting rates.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4855-4855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junmin Li

Abstract OBJECTIVE: We performed a Phase I study to evaluate the toxicity and potential efficacy of Imatinib Mesylate (Glivec) in combination with Tetra-arsenic tetra-sulfide (As4S4) in patients with advanced CML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten CML patients in advanced phase were enrolled in this study. All patients received imatinib with As4S4 150mg/kg/d (day 1–14, each month) for 6 months. The initial dose of imatinib was 400mg/d in first 3 patients, with subsequent escalation to 600mg/d in other 7 patients. Adverse events and potential hematological, cytogenetic and molecular response was closely monitored. A concurrent control group of 10 patients received imatinib monotherapy at 600mg/d was included for the analysis of toxicity profile and clinical efficacy. RESULTS: From Dec.2003 to Jun.2004, a total of 10 patients (6 males and 4 females with median age at 33.5) were enrolled in this trial, in which 5 in accelerated phase(AP)and 5 in blast crisis (BC). There were no significant differences in base-line characteristics between the study group and the concurrent control group. Non-hematologic toxicities such as gastrointestinal discomfort, edema, liver dysfunction and myalgia/bone pain were common and mild (Grade 1/2). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia, occurred in 3 patients. There was no difference in either hematological or non-hematological toxicities between the study and the control group. The patients in both group had equivalent complete hematological response (CHR= 70%) and complete cytogenetic response (CCR= 30%) rates. All 3 patients in the study group with CCR achieved more than 3 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts level while only one patient obtained a molecular response in control group. With a median follow-up of 14 months (2 to 18 months) in both group, the patients in study group showed a similar overall survival (1yr OS 68.6%±15.2%) and a slight better progress free survival (1yr PFS 75.0%±17.3%) compared to concurrent control group (1yr OS 70.0%±14.5% and 1yr PFS 50.5%±17.7%). Of notice, all patients with cytogenetic and molecular response did not have additional cytogenetic abnormality besides the Ph chromosome before the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The combination therapy with 600mg daily imanitib and 150mg/d As4S4 is safe and feasible for advanced CML patients. Though patients with additional cytogenetic abnormality were unlikely to response to the combination therapy, complete hematological, cytogenetic and even molecular response was documented in the advanced CML patients with combination therapy. The primary data suggested a potential clinical benefit in patients with advanced CML, thus clinical trial to further test in chronic phase CML without additional cytogenetic abnormality will be warranted.


1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 780-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan A.J.W. Kluytmans ◽  
Johan W. Mouton ◽  
Marjolein F.Q. VandenBergh ◽  
Marie-José A.A.J. Manders ◽  
Alexander P.W.M. Maat ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective:To test the hypothesis that perioperative elimination of nasal carriage ofStaphylococcus aureususing mupirocin nasal ointment reduces the surgical-site infection (SSI) rate in cardiothoracic surgery.Design:Unblinded intervention trial with historical controls.Setting:A university hospital, tertiary referral center for cardiothoracic surgery.Patients:Consecutive patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery between August 1, 1989, and February 1, 1991 (historical control group), and between March 1, 1991, and August 1, 1992 (intervention group).Results:The historical control group consisted of 928 patients and the intervention group of 868, of whom 752 actually were treated. The 116 patients who were unintentionally not treated were considered as a concurrent control group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, a significant reduction in SSI rate was observed after the intervention (historical-control group 7.3% and intervention group 2.8%;P<.0001). The SSI rate in the concurrent control group was significantly higher than in the treated group (7.8% and 2.0%, respectively;P=.0023). Resistance ofS aureusto mupirocin was not observed.Conclusion:The results of this study indicate that perioperative elimination of nasal carriage using mupirocin nasal ointment significantly reduces the SSI rate in cardiothoracic surgery patients and warrants a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled efficacy trial. This preventive measure may be beneficial in other categories of surgical patients as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document