Who are the beneficiaries and what are the reasons for non-utilization of care respite and support services? A cross-sectional study on family caregivers

Background Family caregivers assume substantial caregiving responsibilities for persons with chronic conditions, such as individuals with spinal cord injury, which leads to negative impacts on their lives. Respite care and other services are provided as a temporary relief and support for them. Design of appropriate respite care programs depends on identification of beneficiary subgroups for the different types of service. This study aimed to quantify the uptake of different respite and support services for family caregivers, the reasons for non-use, and to explore the respective predictors. Methods A cross-sectional survey of family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury was conducted nationwide in Switzerland. The use of 11 different respite and support services during the previous 12 months was investigated, along with caregivers’ reasons for not using any respite. Classification trees were used to characterize the beneficiaries and reasons for not using respite. Results About a third of family caregivers used at least one type of respite or support service during the previous 12 months. Utilization of respite care was greater among those who employed professional home care (57% vs 24% of those without professional home care). Marked cantonal differences were also observed in utilization of respite care. The primary reason for not using respite services was “no demand” (80% of non-users of respite services), mainly among caregivers who were less emotionally affected by their caregiving tasks. Conclusions Utilization of respite and support services depends more on place of residence and use of home care services than on functional status of the care recipient. Accordingly, programs should be tailored to the cultural context of their potential users. This is best achieved through coordination with local health care professionals who can identify needs, provide information, initiate referrals, and integrate the care into a larger support plan.

Early Start of Anti-Dementia Medication Delays Transition to 24-Hour Care in Alzheimer’s Disease Patients: A Finnish Nationwide Cohort Study

Background: Dementia is one of the strongest predictors of admission to a 24-hour care facility among older people, and 24-hour care is the major cost of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of early start of anti-dementia medication and other predisposing factors with 2-year risk of transition to 24-hour care in the nationwide cohort of Finnish AD patients. Methods: This was a retrospective, non-interventional study based on individual-level data from Finnish national health and social care registers. The incident cohort included 7,454 AD patients (ICD-10, G30) comprised of two subgroups: those living unassisted at home (n = 5,002), and those receiving professional home care (n = 2,452). The primary outcome was admission to a 24-hour care facility. Exploratory variables were early versus late anti-dementia medication start, sociodemographic variables, care intensity level, and comorbidities. Results: Early anti-dementia medication reduced the risk of admission to 24-hour care both in patients living unassisted at home, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.58 (p < 0.001), and those receiving professional home care (HR, 0.84; p = 0.039). Being unmarried (HR, 1.69; p < 0.001), having an informal caregiver (HR, 1.69; p = 0.003), or having a diagnosis of additional neurological disorder (HR, 1.68; p = 0.006) or hip fracture (HR, 1.61; p = 0.004) were associated with higher risk of admission to 24-hour care in patients living unassisted at home. Conclusion: To support living at home, early start of anti-dementia medication should be a high priority in newly diagnosed AD patients.

Who are the beneficiaries and what are the reasons for non-utilization of respite care? A cross-sectional study on family caregivers

BackgroundFamily caregivers assume substantial caregiving responsibilities for persons with chronic conditions, which leads to negative impact on their lives. Respite care is provided as a temporary relief for them. The design of appropriate respite care programs requires the identification of beneficiary subgroups for different types of services. The objectives of the study were to quantify the uptake of respite care services by family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury, and to identify the main beneficiaries of the respective offers and the reasons for non-use.MethodsA cross-sectional survey of family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury was conducted nationwide in Switzerland. The use of 11 different respite care services during the last 12 months was investigated, along with caregivers’ reasons for not using any respite service. Classification trees were used to characterize the beneficiaries and reasons for not using respite services.ResultsOne-third of family caregivers used at least one type of respite care service during the last 12 months. Utilization of respite care was found to be greater among those who employed professional home care (57% vs 24% among those without professional home care). There were marked cantonal differences in the utilization of respite care. The primary reason for not using respite services was “no demand” (80% among non-users of respite services), mainly among caregivers who were less emotionally affected by their caregiving tasks. Conclusions Utilization of respite care services primarily depends on living arrangements and place of residency and less on the functional status of the care recipient. Programs should thus be tailored to the cultural context of their potential users. This is best achieved through coordination with local health care professionals who can identify the needs, provide information, initiate referrals, and integrate the care into a larger support plan.

Formal home care use by older adults: trajectories and determinants in the Lc65+ cohort

Background Given the increasing importance of formal home care services in policies dedicated to elder care, there is major interest in studying individuals’ characteristics determining their utilization. The main objective of this research was to quantify, during a 6-year timeframe, home care use trajectories followed by community-dwelling participants in a cohort study of older adults. The secondary objective was to identify factors associated with home care utilization using Andersen’s Behavioural Model of Health Services Use. Methods We proceeded to an analysis of data prospectively collected in the setting of the Lc65+ population-based study conducted in Lausanne (Switzerland). Self-reported utilization of professional home care in 2012 and 2018 was used to define trajectories during this timeframe (i.e. non-users, new users, former users and continuing users). Bivariable analyses were performed to compare new users to non-users regarding the three dimensions of Andersen’s model (predisposing, enabling and need factors) measured at baseline. Then, binomial logistic regression was used in a series of two hierarchical models to adjust for need factors first, before adding predisposing and enabling factors in a second model. Results Of 2155 participants aged between 69 and 78 in 2012, 82.8% remained non-users in 2018, whereas 11.2% started to use professional home care. There were 3.3% of continuing users and 2.7% of former users. New users exhibited a higher burden of physical and psychological complaints, chronic health conditions and functional limitations at baseline. After adjusting for these need factors, odds of home care utilization were higher only in participants reporting a difficult financial situation (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.12–2.45). Conclusions In the setting of a Swiss city, incident utilization of formal home care by older adults appeared to be largely determined by need factors. Modifiable factors like personal beliefs and knowledge about home care services did not play a role. After adjusting for need, odds of becoming home care user remained higher in participants reporting a difficult financial situation, suggesting such vulnerability does not hamper access to professional home care in this specific context.

Care Challenges in the Bathroom: The Views of Professional Care Providers Working in Clients’ Homes

In home care, bathroom activities—particularly bathing and toileting—present a unique set of challenges. In this focus group study, professional home care providers identified factors that increase the danger and difficulty of assisting their clients with bathing and toileting. These included small restrictive spaces, a poor fit between available equipment and the environment, a reliance on manual handling techniques (but insufficient space to use optimal body mechanics), attempts to maintain normalcy, and caring for unsteady and unpredictable clients. Specific elements of each activity that care providers found difficult included multitasking to support client stability while performing care below the waist (dressing/undressing, providing perineal care) and helping clients to lift their legs in and out of a bathtub. Participants did not feel that available assistive devices provided enough assistance to reduce the danger and difficulty of these activities.