Notes on the role of dynamic DNA methylation in mammalian development

It has been nearly 40 y since it was suggested that genomic methylation patterns could be transmitted via maintenance methylation during S phase and might play a role in the dynamic regulation of gene expression during development [Holliday R, Pugh JE (1975) Science 187(4173):226–232; Riggs AD (1975) Cytogenet Cell Genet 14(1):9–25]. This revolutionary proposal was justified by “... our almost complete ignorance of the mechanism for the unfolding of the genetic program during development” that prevailed at the time. Many correlations between transcriptional activation and demethylation have since been reported, but causation has not been demonstrated and to date there is no reasonable proof of the existence of a complex biochemical system that activates and represses genes via reversible DNA methylation. Such a system would supplement or replace the conserved web of transcription factors that regulate cellular differentiation in organisms that have unmethylated genomes (such as Caenorhaditis elegans and the Dipteran insects) and those that methylate their genomes. DNA methylation does have essential roles in irreversible promoter silencing, as in the monoallelic expression of imprinted genes, in the silencing of transposons, and in X chromosome inactivation in female mammals. Rather than reinforcing or replacing regulatory pathways that are conserved between organisms that have either methylated or unmethylated genomes, DNA methylation endows genomes with the ability to subject specific sequences to irreversible transcriptional silencing even in the presence of all of the factors required for their expression, an ability that is generally unavailable to organisms that have unmethylated genomes.

Regulation of alternative splicing of Gtf2ird1 and its impact on slow muscle promoter activity

A human MusTRD [muscle TFII-I repeat domain (RD)-containing protein] isoform was originally identified in a yeast one-hybrid screen as a protein that binds the slow fibre-specific enhancer of the muscle gene troponin I slow [O'Mahoney, Guven, Lin, Joya, Robinson, Wade and Hardeman (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 6641–6652]. MusTRD shares homology with the general transcription factor TFII-I by the presence of diagnostic I-RDs [Roy (2001) Gene 274, 1–13]. The human gene encoding MusTRD, GTF2IRD1 (WBSCR11/GTF3), was subsequently located on chromosome 7q11.23, a region deleted in the neurodegenerative disease, Williams–Beuren Syndrome [Osborne, Campbell, Daradich, Scherer, Tsui, Franke, Peoples, Francke, Voit, Kramer et al. (1999) Genomics 57, 279–284; Franke, Peoples and Francke (1999) Cytogenet. Cell. Genet. 86, 296–304; Tassabehji, Carette, Wilmot, Donnai, Read and Metcalfe (1999) Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 7, 737–747]. The haploinsufficiency of MusTRD has been implicated in the myopathic aspect of this disease, which manifests itself in symptoms such as lowered resistance to fatigue, kyphoscoliosis, an abnormal gait and joint contractures [Tassabehji, Carette, Wilmot, Donnai, Read and Metcalfe (1999) Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 7, 737–747]. Here, we report the identification of 11 isoforms of MusTRD in mouse skeletal muscles. These isoforms were isolated from a mouse skeletal muscle cDNA library and reverse transcription–PCR on RNA from various adult and embryonic muscles. The variability in these isoforms arises from alternative splicing of a combination of four cassettes and two mutually exclusive exons, all in the 3′ region of the primary transcript of Gtf2ird1, the homologous mouse gene. The expression of some of these isoforms is differentially regulated spatially, suggesting individual regulation of the expression of these isoforms. Co-transfection studies in C2C12 muscle cell cultures reveal that isoforms differentially regulate muscle fibre-type-specific promoters. This indicates that the presence of different domains of MusTRD influences the activity exerted by this molecule on multiple promoters active in skeletal muscle.

Metalloproteinase-like, disintegrin-like, cysteine-rich proteins MDC2 and MDC3: novel human cellular disintegrins highly expressed in the brain

Cellular disintegrins are a family of membrane-anchored proteins structurally related to snake venom disintegrins, and are potential regulators of cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions. The members of this protein family are also called ADAMs (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase) or MDC proteins (metalloproteinase-like disintegrin-like cysteine-rich), because they all contain disintegrin-like and metalloproteinase-like domains. In this paper, we report the cloning and sequence analysis of two novel additional members of this family, which we have termed MDC2 and MDC3. The deduced amino acid sequences reveal that the two proteins possess typical cellular disintegrin structures [that is, pro-, metalloproteinase-like, disintegrin-like, cysteine-rich, epidermal growth factor-like, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic domains] and exhibit high sequence similarity with human MDC/ADAM11 protein [Katagiri, Harada, Emi and Nakamura (1995) Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 68, 39–44]. A zinc-binding motif, which is critical for proteinase activity, is disrupted in the metalloproteinase-like domain of MDC2 and MDC3, as well as MDC/ADAM11. In the disintegrin-like domain of snake venom short disintegrins, the RDG-containing loops are critical for integrin binding. These three MDCs do not contain the RDG sequences, but the corresponding loops in these proteins are similar to each other. Northern blot analysis revealed that the mRNAs of MDC2, MDC3 and MDC/ADAM11 are highly expressed in the brain. These findings suggest that these proteins may function as integrin ligands in the brain.