single unit response
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

18
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 682-690
Author(s):  
Anthony V. Incognito ◽  
Massimo Nardone ◽  
André L. Teixeira ◽  
Jordan B. Lee ◽  
Muhammad M. Kathia ◽  
...  

Muscle sympathetic single units respond differentially to sympathoexcitatory stress such that single units can increase firing to contribute to the sympathoexcitatory response or can be nonresponsive or even inhibited. We observed a subgroup of single units that can respond bidirectionally, being first inhibited before activated by progressive increases in forearm muscle metaboreflex activation. These results suggest convergent neural inputs (i.e., inhibitory and excitatory), which yield heterogenous muscle sympathetic single-unit activation thresholds.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory J. Gerling ◽  
Isabelle I. Rivest ◽  
Daine R. Lesniak ◽  
Jacob R. Scanlon ◽  
Lingtian Wan

2013 ◽  
Vol 368 (1628) ◽  
pp. 20130069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koorosh Mirpour ◽  
James W. Bisley

When searching for an object, we usually avoid items that are visually different from the target and objects or places that have been searched already. Previous studies have shown that neural activity in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) can be used to guide this behaviour; responses to task irrelevant stimuli or to stimuli that have been fixated previously in the trial are reduced compared with responses to potential targets. Here, we test the hypothesis that these reduced responses have a different genesis. Two animals were trained on a visual foraging task, in which they had to find a target among a number of physically identical potential targets (T) and task irrelevant distractors. We recorded neural activity and local field potentials (LFPs) in LIP while the animals performed the task. We found that LFP power was similar for potential targets and distractors but was greater in the alpha and low beta bands when a previously fixated T was in the response field. We interpret these data to suggest that the reduced single-unit response to distractors is a bottom-up feed-forward result of processing in earlier areas and the reduced response to previously fixated Ts is a result of active top-down suppression.


1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 2083-2097 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ghoshal ◽  
D. O. Kim

Ghoshal, S. and D. O. Kim. Marginal shell of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus: single-unit response properties in the unanesthetized decerebrate cat. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 2083–2097, 1997. The marginal shell of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) is anatomically different from its central core. We investigated 38 single units in the shells of 10 cats and contrasted them with 62 single units in the cores of 15 cats. The sites of all shell units were localized with the use of reconstructed electrode tracks. The shell units were divided into acoustically well-driven (68%) and weakly/not-driven (32%) subgroups. The shell units mostly exhibited low spontaneous rates (SRs). Among the well-driven shell units, a large majority (68%) exhibited wide dynamic ranges (≥50 dB) to tones, noise, or both, with some ranges as wide as 89 dB. In contrast, a large majority (80%) of the core units exhibited narrow dynamic ranges (<50 dB) to tones and noise. The poststimulus time histograms (PSTHs) of the well-driven shell units included pause-build (29%), onset (24%), and unusual (33%) types, whereas those of the core units included mainly primary-like (47%) and chopper (29%) types. The excitatory-inhibitory areas (EIAs) of the well-driven shell units included types I/III (47%), III (22%), IV (13%), and II (9%), whereas those of the core units included mainly types III (52%) and I/III (32%). On the basis of Fisher's exact tests, we conclude that the shell and core neural groups of the AVCN are significantly different regarding all of the following physiological characteristics: SR, maximum driven rate, threshold and dynamic range to tones and noise, frequency response area, PSTH type, latency, and EIA type. Wide dynamic ranges of the well-driven shell units suggest that they may play a role in encoding absolute intensity of acoustic stimulus.


1990 ◽  
Vol 258 (2) ◽  
pp. R376-R382 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. E. Albers ◽  
J. E. Ottenweller ◽  
S. Y. Liou ◽  
M. D. Lumpkin ◽  
E. R. Anderson

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether neuropeptide Y (NPY) acts within the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) or the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) to alter circulating levels of corticosterone and to evaluate the effects of NPY on the single-unit response of PVN and SCN neurons using the hypothalamic slice preparation. Blood levels of corticosterone were determined in groups of rats that received microinjections of NPY or saline (Sal) into the PVN or SCN. NPY injected into the PVN 4 h after light onset resulted in corticosterone levels of 13.15 +/- 2.18 (SE) micrograms/dl within 1 h, which were significantly higher than the corticosterone levels of 4.08 +/- 1.78 micrograms/dl seen in rats receiving Sal injections. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in circulating levels of corticosterone between groups of rats 1 or 4 h after NPY or Sal microinjection into the SCN. In the hypothalamic slice, NPY was found to produce primarily inhibitory responses in both SCN and PVN neurons. Forty-nine percent of the SCN units examined were inhibited. In addition, another 20% of the neurons tested in the SCN displayed excitation followed by more sustained inhibition. In the PVN, 45% of the units examined were inhibited by NPY, however, nearly 30% of the remaining neurons were significantly excited by NPY. In summary, NPY alters the electrical activity of both SCN and PVN neurons but appears to act only within the PVN to influence circulating levels of corticosterone. These and other data indicate that NPY acts as an important neurochemical messenger within several hypothalamic sites.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document