P–321 The impact of endometrioma and ovarian cystectomy in patients with major indications for IVF/ICSI with endometriosis

Study question Does presence of endometrioma has worse IVF/ICSI outcome than endometriosis per se? What about the impact of cystectomy of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes? Summary answer IVF/ICSI outcome of patients with endometrioma is comparable than with endometriosis. Cystectomy for endometrioma did not alter IVF/ICSI outcomes if ovarian reserve is comparable. What is known already Previous studies revealed women with endometrioma undergoing IVF/ICSI had similar reproductive outcomes compared with those without. Most of the comparisons are between women with endometrioma and women without endometriosis. However, endometrioma per se, different from endometriosis may have specific impact on IVF/ICSI outcomes. There is now molecular, histological and morphological evidence to suggest endometrioma is detrimental to the ovaries. Studies comparing IVF/ICSI outcomes between women with endometrioma and women with endometriosis are few. Cystectomy of endometrioma may worse ovarian reserve, and subsequently adversely affect IVF/ICSI outcomes. But there are possible complications associated with the persistence of endometrioma during IVF/ICSI. Study design, size, duration Retrospective analysis of 2153 IVF/ICSI cases during Jan/01/2014 to Dec/31/2018 in VGHTC. We included women who received ART due to endometriosis(n = 208). Exclusion criteria including patients >40 years-old, simulation day < 5 days, severe male factor, uterine factor (including adenomyosis) and immunological factors. Patients whose embryos were not completely transferred back or who received embryo transfer from different OPU cycles are excluded. We followed up these patients till 2020/6. The primary outcome is cumulative LBR Participants/materials, setting, methods For first analysis, we divided 208 cases to patients with endometrioma during IVF/ICSI(n = 89), and patients only diagnosed of endometriosis (n = 119). Second analysis on the effect of cystectomy of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes. Patients with endometrioma (n = 89) during IVF/ICSI were further divided to patients with primary endometrioma (n = 70) and patients with recurrent endometrioma (n = 19, ever received cystectomy for endometrioma). Another group is patients without endometrioma during IVF/ICSI, but ever received cystectomy before (n = 40) Main results and the role of chance For the first analysis, age, BMI and AMH were comparable in endometrioma (n = 89) and endometriosis group(n = 119). The usage gonadotropin dose was significantly higher in the endometrioma group (FSH 3619IU vs 3471IU, p = 0.001. LH 1224 IU vs 941 IU, p = 0.009). The Blastocyst formation rate is lower in the endometrioma group (49.4% vs. 57.7% p = 0.005). The OPU number, LBR and cumulative LBR were comparable in both groups (10.3 vs 12.4 p = 0.131, 33.3% vs 37%, p = 0.687, 49.4% vs 60.5%, endometrioma vs endometriosis). For the second analysis, when comparing cystectomy before IVF/ICSI group with primary endometrioma group, cystectomy group were younger (32.8 vs 34.8 p = 0.006). AMH level were comparable. The BC formation rate was significantly higher in the cystectomy group (61.5% vs 50.4% 0= 0.007). The LBR and cumulative LBR were comparable in both groups (43.5% vs 28.1%, 60% vs 48% in cystectomy vs primary endometrioma group). As for the recurrent endometrioma group, the age and AMH level were comparable with cystectomy group, but the usage gonadotropin dose was significantly higher than other two groups. The BC formation rate was also lower than cystectomy group (47.8% vs 61.5% p = 0.042). The LBR and cumulative LBR were comparable with other two groups (55.6%, 57.9%). Limitations, reasons for caution This is a retrospective study, and the sample size is limit. We did not analysis the size of endometrioma nor the unilateral or bilateral endometrioma. Wider implications of the findings: Cystectomy for endometrioma must be carefully selected since it did not alter IVF/ICSI outcome only if the ovarian reserve is not affected. Recurrent endometriomas do not have a worse impact on IVF/ICSI outcome than primary endometrioma. If there is recurrent endometrioma, IVF/ICSI may be the first priority. Trial registration number Not applicable

P-321 The impact of endometrioma and ovarian cystectomy in patients with major indications for IVF/ICSI with endometriosis

Study question Does presence of endometrioma has worse IVF/ICSI outcome than endometriosis per se? What about the impact of cystectomy of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes? Summary answer IVF/ICSI outcome of patients with endometrioma is comparable than with endometriosis. Cystectomy for endometrioma did not alter IVF/ICSI outcomes if ovarian reserve is comparable. What is known already Previous studies revealed women with endometrioma undergoing IVF/ICSI had similar reproductive outcomes compared with those without. Most of the comparisons are between women with endometrioma and women without endometriosis. However, endometrioma per se, different from endometriosis may have specific impact on IVF/ICSI outcomes. There is now molecular, histological and morphological evidence to suggest endometrioma is detrimental to the ovaries. Studies comparing IVF/ICSI outcomes between women with endometrioma and women with endometriosis are few. Cystectomy of endometrioma may worse ovarian reserve, and subsequently adversely affect IVF/ICSI outcomes. But there are possible complications associated with the persistence of endometrioma during IVF/ICSI. Study design, size, duration Retrospective analysis of 2153 IVF/ICSI cases during Jan/01/2014 to Dec/31/2018 in VGHTC. We included women who received ART due to endometriosis(n = 208). Exclusion criteria including patients >40 years-old, simulation day < 5 days, severe male factor, uterine factor (including adenomyosis) and immunological factors. Patients whose embryos were not completely transferred back or who received embryo transfer from different OPU cycles are excluded. We followed up these patients till 2020/6. The primary outcome is cumulative LBR Participants/materials, setting, methods For first analysis, we divided 208 cases to patients with endometrioma during IVF/ICSI(n = 89), and patients only diagnosed of endometriosis (n = 119). Second analysis on the effect of cystectomy of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes. Patients with endometrioma (n = 89) during IVF/ICSI were further divided to patients with primary endometrioma (n = 70) and patients with recurrent endometrioma (n = 19, ever received cystectomy for endometrioma). Another group is patients without endometrioma during IVF/ICSI, but ever received cystectomy before (n = 40) Main results and the role of chance For the first analysis, age, BMI and AMH were comparable in endometrioma (n = 89) and endometriosis group(n = 119). The usage gonadotropin dose was significantly higher in the endometrioma group (FSH 3619IU vs 3471IU, p = 0.001. LH 1224 IU vs 941 IU, p = 0.009). The Blastocyst formation rate is lower in the endometrioma group (49.4% vs. 57.7% p = 0.005). The OPU number, LBR and cumulative LBR were comparable in both groups (10.3 vs 12.4 p = 0.131, 33.3% vs 37%, p = 0.687, 49.4% vs 60.5%, endometrioma vs endometriosis). For the second analysis, when comparing cystectomy before IVF/ICSI group with primary endometrioma group, cystectomy group were younger (32.8 vs 34.8 p = 0.006). AMH level were comparable. The BC formation rate was significantly higher in the cystectomy group (61.5% vs 50.4% 0= 0.007). The LBR and cumulative LBR were comparable in both groups (43.5% vs 28.1%, 60% vs 48% in cystectomy vs primary endometrioma group). As for the recurrent endometrioma group, the age and AMH level were comparable with cystectomy group, but the usage gonadotropin dose was significantly higher than other two groups. The BC formation rate was also lower than cystectomy group (47.8% vs 61.5% p = 0.042). The LBR and cumulative LBR were comparable with other two groups (55.6%, 57.9%). Limitations, reasons for caution This is a retrospective study, and the sample size is limit. We did not analysis the size of endometrioma nor the unilateral or bilateral endometrioma. Wider implications of the findings Cystectomy for endometrioma must be carefully selected since it did not alter IVF/ICSI outcome only if the ovarian reserve is not affected. Recurrent endometriomas do not have a worse impact on IVF/ICSI outcome than primary endometrioma. If there is recurrent endometrioma, IVF/ICSI may be the first priority. Trial registration number not applicable

BCG instillation versus radical cystectomy for high-risk NMIBC with squamous/glandular histologic variants

This study aims to evaluate the effect of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillation and radical cystectomy on high-risk NMIBC with squamous or glandular variants. We retrospectively reviewed the data of high-risk (T1 or CIS or HG or TaG1/G2 with multiple, recurrent, large tumor) NMIBC patients from January 2000 to December 2017. Comparative analysis of radical cystectomy, intravesical BCG, and observation groups was conducted in high-risk NMIBC with squamous or glandular histologic variants. Among the 1263 high-risk NMIBC patient, 62 (4.9%) were reported squamous or glandular histologic variants. Thirty patients underwent BCG instillation and 15 patients were subjected to radical cystectomy. Statistically significant differences were found between the three treatment groups in terms of underlying hypertension (p = 0.031), T stage (p = 0.022) and tumor multiplicity (p = 0.019). Similar 5-year OS (p = 0.893) and CSS (p = 0.811) were observed in each of BCG instillation and radical cystectomy group. BCG instillation showed survival benefit in both OS (p = 0.019) and CSS (p = 0.038) than in the observation group. In high-risk patients diagnosed with NMIBC bladder cancer with squamous or glandular histologic variants, both intravesical BCG and radical cystectomy showed survival gain. In conclusion, BCG instillation represents an appropriate treatment option in high-risk NMIBC with squamous or glandular histologic variant.

Risk of Fracture After Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion for Bladder Cancer

Purpose Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion may cause chronic metabolic acidosis, leading to long-term bone loss in patients with bladder cancer. However, the risk of fractures after radical cystectomy has not been defined. We assessed whether radical cystectomy and intestinal urinary diversion are associated with increased risk of fracture. Patients and Methods Population-based study using SEER-Medicare–linked data from 2000 through 2007 for patients with stage 0-III bladder cancer. We evaluated the association between radical cystectomy and risk of fracture at any site, controlling for patient and disease characteristics. Results The cohort included 50,520 patients, of whom 4,878 had cystectomy and urinary diversion. The incidence of fracture in the cystectomy group was 6.55 fractures per 100 person-years, compared with 6.39 fractures per 100 person-years in those without cystectomy. Cystectomy was associated with a 21% greater risk of fracture (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.32) compared with no cystectomy, controlling for patient and disease characteristics. There was no evidence of an interaction between radical cystectomy and age, sex, comorbidity score, or cancer stage. Conclusion Patients with bladder cancer who have radical cystectomy and urinary diversion are at increased risk of fracture.

The value of clinical prognostic factors for survival in patients with invasive urinary bladder cancer

The aim of the study was to evaluate the value of clinical prognostic factors for survival of patients with invasive urinary bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Material and methods. A total of 115 patients with invasive urinary bladder cancer were analyzed. Twenty-three patients with invasive urinary bladder cancer (pT2–T4) were treated according to the protocol of a prospective clinical study. In all the cases, transurethral resection was followed by radiation and chemotherapy. A total dose of 54–60 Gy of radiotherapy was delivered by daily fractions of 1.8–2.0 Gy each. Simultaneous chemotherapy was started on the same day as radiotherapy; gemcitabine at a dose of 175–300 mg/m2 was delivered once a week intravenously for 6 weeks. Individual patient data was analyzed in a retrospective part of the study. Radical cystectomy was performed to 46 patients with invasive urinary bladder cancer, and radiotherapy was delivered to 46 patients. Inclusion criteria for patients into a prospective or retrospective trial were equal. We evaluated a prognostic value of various clinical factors for patients treated with radical cystectomy, chemoradiation with gemcitabine, and radiation alone. Results. The 3-year overall survival in the cystectomy group was 51.1%, in the chemoradiation group 38.0%, and in the radiotherapy group 26.9% (P=0.001). In univariate analysis in the chemoradiation group, completion of treatment according to the protocol showed a significant influence on overall survival (P=0.03). In the radiation group, completion of treatment according to the protocol showed a significant influence on overall survival too (P=0.01). In the radical cystectomy group, an important factor was a complete or incomplete TUR (P=0.02). Multivariate analysis showed a significance of hydronephrosis (P=0.03) and T stage (P=0.04) in the radiation therapy group. Comorbidity was found to be an independent prognostic factors in the chemoradiation group (P=0.02). Conclusions. The best 3-year overall survival was in the radical cystectomy group. Chemoradiation with gemcitabine could be offered as an alternative to patients refusing cystectomy. Better overall survival in the chemoradiation group was for patients without comorbidities and when treatment protocol was completed.

Anterior Pelvic Reconstruction with Ileum after Cancer Treatment

Ileum has been used to reconstruct the lower urinary tract in 15 patients (10 women, five men) after treatment for bladder or gynaecological cancer. Seven patients had previously received radical pelvic irradiation. Four methods were used: group 1 (five patients): bladder patch after partial cystectomy or bladder augmentation after clam cystotomy for bladder contracture; group 2 (four patients): bladder replacement after subtotal (supratrigonal) cystectomy; group 3 (two patients): ureteric replacement for lower ureteric obstruction or fistula, and group 4 (four patients): complete replacement of bladder and lower ureters after anterior pelvic exenteration, with creation of neovagina from caecum in the two female patients. Review of the results indicates that ileum provides a versatile and safe material for anterior pelvic reconstruction in cancer patients, even after previous pelvic irradiation.