A Review of Interventions for Non-Communicable Diseases in Humanitarian Emergencies in Low-and Middle-Income Countries

BackgroundLow-and middle-income countries (LMICs) not only experience the largest burden of humanitarian emergencies but are also disproportionately affected by non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Interventions addressing NCDs require humanitarian entities to consider complex challenges such as continuity of care, diagnostics, logistics and cost of care for recurrent or expensive treatments, yet primary focus on the topic is lacking. We conducted a systematic review on the effects of humanitarian disasters on NCDs in LMICs with the primary aim of identifying studies on epidemiology, interventions, and treatment. Key interventions were identified and their effects on populations in disaster settings were reviewed.MethodsA systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, MEDLINE (PubMed, for in-process and non-indexed citations), Social Science Citation Index, and Global Health (EBSCO) for indexed articles published before December 11, 2017. Publications reporting on interventions targeting NCDs during disasters in LMICs were included if they incorporated core intervention components as defined by the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Two separate screeners independently evaluated the titles, abstracts and full text of the eligible articles, with vetting by a third reviewer. Key intervention components including target population, phase of crisis, and measured outcomes among others were extracted into a template and synthesized using a thematic analysis approach. The full systematic review is registered at PROSPERO(CRD42018088769).ResultsOf 85 articles eligible for the full systematic review, only seven articles describing interventions met inclusion criteria. Studies focused reporting on the response (n=4) and recovery (n=3) phases of disaster, with no studies reporting on the mitigation or preparedness phases. Successful interventions conducted extensive pre-deployment risk assessments to assess the burden and distinct epidemiology of NCDs amongst affected populations, worked in close cooperation with local health services, assessed individual needs of sub-populations in disaster regions in the response phase, promoted task shifting between humanitarian and development actors, and adopted flexibility in guideline implementation. Training and capacity building of staff were found to be essential elements of successful interventions due to an assessed lack of experience of healthcare workers in disaster settings with NCDs and successfully allowed for incorporation of community health workers.ConclusionsWe found only limited interventions designed to address NCDs in humanitarian emergencies, with a particular dearth of studies addressing the mitigation and preparedness phases of humanitarian response. Delivering interventions for NCDs in humanitarian emergencies requires improved collaboration between humanitarian and development actors in addition to improved NCD training and capacity building amongst healthcare workers in disasters settings.

Multiteam systems in an agile environment: a realist systematic review

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to highlight a collaborative effort between academia (University of North Texas, Team Sciences) and practice (Toyota Connected (TC)). This study concentrated on current problems that had been experienced by TC: How to structure and manage multiteam systems (MTSs)? Design/methodology/approach This research study utilized a realist systematic review to address an existing problem by working collaboratively with TC and academia. This collaboration involved problem identification, the development of research questions and a full systematic review guided by the research questions. Findings This realist systematic review merged the literature with current practices at TC in an effort to gather evidence to support the best method of structuring and managing MTSs. The findings include a leadership structure that incorporates both shared leadership (bottom-up) and existing hierarchical structures (top-down). Practical implications The MTS models presented in this study provide new models for organizations/manufacturers/industries to use as a guide when structuring their MTSs. Originality/value This study provides an example of a collaborative research effort between practice and academia using a realist systematic review. The paper also provides some multiteam system models that could be implemented and tested in different organizations. Also, new responsibilities and roles for scrum and MTSs are presented as a new method of achieving Agile.

Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging Evaluation in Physiotherapy: Piloting a Systematic Review

Background: Research of ultrasound use in physiotherapy and daily practice has led to its use as an everyday tool. Methods: The aims were: (1) Checking the proposed systematic review protocol methodology; (2) evaluating the evidence from the last five years; and (3) coordinating the work of the team of reviewers in performing a complete systematic review. Thus, this is a pilot study prior to a full systematic review. The findings in databases related to health sciences with the meta-search engine Discovery EBSCO, Covidence, and Revman were used. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were described for eligibility. Results: Search provided 1029 references regarding the lumbar region on ultrasound scans. Of these, 33 were duplicates. After Covidence, 996 studies were left for screening. A full-text reading brought one randomized clinical trial (RCT). Conclusions: Validity and reliability references were found. The most suitable points were novice versus expert, and ultrasound versus electromyography (EMG) with just one RCT cohort, and observational and case reports. The lines of investigation increasingly endorsed the validity of using ultrasound in physiotherapy. Post-acquisition image analysis could also be a future line of research.