teretriosoma nigrescens
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

14
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1405-1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Borgemeister ◽  
Felicien Djossou ◽  
Cyrille Adda ◽  
Heiner Schneider ◽  
Bernadin Djomamou ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Borgemeister ◽  
W. G. Meikle ◽  
D. Scholz ◽  
C. Adda ◽  
P. Degbey ◽  
...  

AbstractInvestigations were carried out in southern Benin on the annual flight cycle and the effects of weather variables on the flight activity of Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) and its natural enemy, Teretriosoma nigrescens Lewis. Two seasonal peaks in flight activity of P. truncatus were observed, one between the end of December and the beginning of January and a second one between May and June. Teretriosoma nigrescens showed a single delayed peak in June, approximately six weeks after the major peak of P. truncatus. Flight activity of P. truncatus was only weakly associated with weather characteristics (standardized regression coefficient for mean daily temperature b = 0.18, t = 2.87, P < 0.05)), whereas for T. nigrescens it was associated with precipitation (standardized regression coefficient for accumulated rainfall during the trapping period b = 0.38, t = 4.76, P < 0.05). The possibility that one of the P. truncatus peaks was associated with dispersal from crowded maize stores and the other with the search for natural woody host plants is discussed.


1994 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.J. Tigar ◽  
P.E. Osborne ◽  
G.E. Key ◽  
M.E. Flores-S ◽  
M. Vazquez-A.

AbstractCatches of Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) and Teretriosoma nigrescens Lewis from 205 pheromone trapping stations in Mexico were compared and related to climate and habitat. Prostephanus truncatus numbers differed between regions and over time with significant interaction between the two. An overall peak in captures occurred between August and November but this was not apparent in Veracruz and Chiapas. Catches of T. nigrescens also differed but effects were less distinct. The peak in P. truncatus catch was related to monthly rainfall and, with a time lag, minimum temperature in the drier, upland regions, but poorly matched in Chiapas and Veracruz. Prostephanus truncatus abundance was predicted from climatic and habitat data during the periods March to 3 July, and 31 July to November. A regression equation derived from temperature, humidity and rainfall, explained 82% of the variance in the P. truncatus catch in the later period. Local habitat made only a small addition to this model. The best correlate of T. nigrescens numbers was the catch of P. truncatus, but it was less abundant relative to P. truncatus as P. truncatus became more numerous and where annual r.h. was above 70%. Predicted abundance of P. truncatus from the regression model is compared with predictions from laboratory studies of reproductive potential under different climatic regimes. While laboratory studies predict high survival in hot, humid areas, the trap data showed higher catches in cooler, more temperate regions. Possible reasons for these differences and implications for the spread of P. truncatus in Africa are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document