Fremanezumab autoinjector pen for the prevention of migraine

Ajovy (fremanezumab, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Israel) is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively binds both isoforms of the calcitonin gene-related peptide. Calcitonin gene-related peptide is a 37-amino acid neuropeptide involved in central and peripheral pathophysiological events in migraine. It is indicated for prophylaxis of migraine in adults who have at least four migraine days per month, and can be administered as a subcutaneous injection using an autoinjector device, with two dosing options: 225 mg once a month or 675 mg quarterly. In this article, I present data from Phase III clinical trials of fremanezumab in episodic and chronic migraine, in which fremanezumab demonstrated efficacy and had a favorable tolerability profile, with no serious treatment-related adverse events.

Tolerability and Efficacy of Customized IncobotulinumtoxinA Injections for Essential Tremor: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

In this first, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled exploratory trial, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA and feasibility of using kinematic tremor assessment to aid in the planning of muscle selection in a multicenter setting. Reproducibility of the planning technology to other clinical sites was explored. In this trial (NCT02207946), patients with upper-limb essential tremor (ET) were randomized 2:1 to a single treatment cycle of incobotulinumtoxinA or placebo. A tremor kinematic analytics investigational device was used to define a customized muscle set for injection, related to the pattern of the wrist, forearm, elbow, and shoulder tremor for each patient, and the incobotulinumtoxinA dose per muscle (total ≤ 200 U). Fahn–Tolosa–Marin (FTM) Part B motor performance score, Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS), and kinematic analysis-based efficacy evaluations were assessed. Thirty patients were randomized (incobotulinumtoxinA, n = 19; placebo, n = 11). FTM motor performance scores showed greater improvement with incobotulinumtoxinA versus placebo at Week 4 (p= 0.003) and Week 8 (p= 0.031). The physician-rated GICS score indicated improvement with incobotulinumtoxinA versus placebo at Week 4 (p < 0.05). IncobotulinumtoxinA also decreased accelerometric hand-tremor amplitude versus placebo from baseline to Week 4 (p= 0.004) and Week 8 (p < 0.001), with persistent tremor reduction up to 24 weeks post-injection. IncobotulinumtoxinA produced a slight and transient reduction of maximal grip strength versus placebo; two patients reported localized finger muscle weakness. Customized incobotulinumtoxinA injections decreased tremor severity and improved hand motor function in patients with upper-limb ET after a single injection cycle, with a favorable tolerability profile. The study showed that tremor kinematic analytics technology could be successfully scaled for use in other clinical sites.

Once-daily Doravirine for Initial Treatment of Adults Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus–1: An Integrated Safety Analysis

Background A prespecified integrated safety analysis was conducted for 3 doravirine (DOR) double-blind trials (Phase IIb: P007 [NCT01632345]; Phase III: DRIVE-FORWARD [NCT02275780] and DRIVE-AHEAD [NCT02403674]). Methods DOR (100 mg) arms from these trials were compared with darunavir plus ritonavir (DRV+r) in DRIVE-FORWARD and efavirenz (EFV) in P007 and DRIVE-AHEAD. Background therapies were emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) in P007; abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) or FTC/TDF in DRIVE-FORWARD; and 3TC/TDF for DOR and FTC/TDF for EFV in DRIVE-AHEAD. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants discontinuing due to adverse events (AEs) through Week 48. Results Discontinuation rates due to AEs were similar for participants on DOR and DRV+r (2.5% vs 3.1%, respectively) and lower for those on DOR than for those on EFV (2.5% vs 6.6%, respectively). Rates of drug-related AEs for DOR, DRV+r, and EFV were 30.9%, 32.1%, and 61.4%, respectively. In an analysis of DOR versus EFV, the treatment difference for discontinuations due to AEs was −3.4%, favoring DOR (95% confidence interval −6.2 to −0.8; P = .012). Fewer participants experienced neuropsychiatric AEs on DOR than on EFV (25.0% vs 55.9%, respectively), and fewer experienced diarrhea on DOR than on DRV+r (12.4% vs 22.5%, respectively). Changes from baseline in most lipid parameters also favored DOR. Conclusions At Week 48, DOR at 100 mg had a favorable safety profile compared with EFV or DRV+r and a favorable tolerability profile compared with EFV.

A pediatric phase I study of larotrectinib, a highly selective inhibitor of the tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) family.

10510 Background: Larotrectinib is the first selective small-molecule inhibitor of TRKA, B, and C in clinical development. Data from the adult phase I trial demonstrate prolonged responses in patients (pts) with TRK fusions and a favorable tolerability profile. Methods: This multicenter, rolling 6 phase I study enrolled pts with refractory solid or CNS tumors aged ≥ 1 month – 21 years. Pts were dosed orally BID on a continuous 28-day schedule either by capsule or solution. Pharmacokinetic (PK)-directed intra-subject dose escalation was permitted, with exposures targeting the adult recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of 100 mg BID. The primary objective was to define the MTD / RP2D; secondary objectives included PK and efficacy using RECIST v1.1. Results: As of December 31, 2016, 17 pts (12 with TRK fusions, 5 without TRK fusions) with a median age of 5.2 years (0.4 – 18.3) were enrolled to 3 dose levels. Pts were enrolled with fusions of all 3 NTRK genes: NTRK1 (n=6), NTRK2 (n=1), and NTRK3 (n=5) in heterogeneous tumor diagnoses: infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS) (n=6), other sarcoma (n=4), and papillary thyroid cancer (n=2). Most common AEs regardless of attribution were vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue. While 8 (47%) pts experienced grade 3-4 AEs, none were attributed to larotrectinib. No DLTs were observed and an MTD was not established. Both formulations delivered dose-dependent PK comparable to the adult RP2D at dose level 3. 12 pts (10 with TRK fusions, 2 without TRK fusions) remain on treatment with median follow-up of 2.8 months (0.7 – 8.4). Among TRK fusion pts, the vast majority have achieved confirmed RECIST responses regardless of tumor diagnoses. No responses were seen in pts without TRK fusions (n=4). 5 pts discontinued therapy, including 2 with TRK fusions: 1 pt with IFS had sufficient response to allow tumor resection, and 1 pt with IFS progressed with a documented acquired resistance mutation. Conclusions: Larotrectinib has demonstrated a favorable tolerability profile and histology-independent efficacy in pediatric pts harboring TRK fusions. Updated safety and efficacy data will be presented, including the RP2D, response rate, duration of response, and use of larotrectinib in the pre-surgical setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02637687.

Tolerability of desvenlafaxine in clinical practice: An observational phase-IV study

IntroductionDesvenlafaxine is a SNRI which presents low affinity for muscarinic, H1 and α1 in vitro receptors and a marginal hepatic metabolism. Different studies have shown effectiveness and a favorable tolerability profile, but only a few of them have been realized independently.Objectives and aimsTo study the incidence and characteristics of short-term desvenlafaxine side effects (SE) in daily clinical practice.MethodsA total of 123 patients with recently introduced desvenlafaxine treatment are recruited from Barakaldo and Uribe-Kosta Mental Health Centers, and UKU scale is administered to measure SE. Descriptive data are calculated using SPSS v.22.ResultsSE are observed in 30.09%. Among these, 5.69% experimented improvement or disappearance of SE with dose reduction, whereas 16.26% had to stop DVF treatment. The most frequent SE was nausea/vomiting (7.3%), followed by dry mouth (4.9%), blurred vision (4.9%), tachycardia (4.1%), sexual SE (4.1%) and tension/inner unrest (4.1%). Among the patients with anxiety disorders, 27.78% present SE versus 30.47% of patients with other diagnoses.ConclusionsThe characteristics of SE with DVF in daily clinical practice are comparable to those found in previous studies, and the overall profile is more benign than other AD. Aspects such as gender and sexual function must be considered. In patients with anxious symptoms DVF is also effective and ES are presented similarly, opening a new line of research and treatment of conditions with these characteristics.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Evaluation of clinically selected patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recruited in China in a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study in Asia of gefitinib (G) versus carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P) (IPASS)

8041^ Background: The IRESSA Pan Asia Study (IPASS) demonstrated superiority of G vs C/P for progression-free survival (PFS) in 1,217 chemonaïve, never/light ex-smokers with WHO PS 0–2, adenocarcinoma histology and stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. PFS favored C/P initially then G, likely driven by different outcomes according to EGFR mutation (M) status. Planned analyses of pts recruited in China are reported. Methods: 372 pts in China (31% of overall population) were randomized to G 250 mg/day (n=184) or C (AUC 5 or 6)/P (200 mg/m2) (n=188). Primary objective was to assess PFS in ITT population; a treatment by country interaction test (China vs other) was performed. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR, RECIST), QoL (FACT-L, TOI), symptom improvement (LCS) and tolerability. Results: PFS results for pts in China did not significantly differ from other pts (interaction test p=0.4265). G demonstrated numerically longer PFS vs C/P; effect was not constant over time, favoring C/P initially then G. Preliminary OS (28% maturity; follow-up ongoing) was similar for G and C/P. ORR was significantly higher with G (45%) than C/P (30%). QoL improvement rates were higher with G than C/P (FACT-L 44 vs 34%; TOI 45 vs 25%); symptom improvement rates were similar (LCS 48 vs 42%). G had a more favorable tolerability profile than C/P. Conclusions: For pts in China, efficacy and tolerability data were generally consistent with the overall population. G demonstrated improved efficacy (PFS and ORR), similar OS, higher QoL and similar symptom improvement rates and more favorable tolerability profile compared with C/P in chemonaïve, never/light ex-smokers with advanced NSCLC and adenocarcinoma histology. In IPASS, EGFR mutation status appeared to be a strong predictive biomarker for G efficacy compared with C/P. [Table: see text] [Table: see text] ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and Exceptions In compliance with the guidelines established by the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:519–521) and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), ASCO strives to promote balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor through disclosure of financial and other interests, and identification and management of potential conflicts. According to the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy, the following financial and other relationships must be disclosed: employment or leadership position, consultant or advisory role, stock ownership, honoraria, research funding, expert testimony, and other remuneration (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:520). The ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy disclosure requirements apply to all authors who submit abstracts to the Annual Meeting. For clinical trials that began accrual on or after April 29, 2004, ASCO's Policy places some restrictions on the financial relationships of principal investigators (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:521). If a principal investigator holds any restricted relationships, his or her abstract will be ineligible for placement in the 2009 Annual Meeting unless the ASCO Ethics Committee grants an exception. Among the circumstances that might justify an exception are that the principal investigator (1) is a widely acknowledged expert in a particular therapeutic area; (2) is the inventor of a unique technology or treatment being evaluated in the clinical trial; or (3) is involved in international clinical oncology research and has acted consistently with recognized international standards of ethics in the conduct of clinical research. NIH-sponsored trials are exempt from the Policy restrictions. Abstracts for which authors requested and have been granted an exception in accordance with ASCO's Policy are designated with a caret symbol (^) in the Annual Meeting Proceedings. For more information about the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and the exceptions process, please visit www.asco.org/conflictofinterest .