repeated event
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

51
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Memory ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Patricia I. Coburn ◽  
Deborah A. Connolly ◽  
Dayna M. Woiwod ◽  
A. George Alder ◽  
Daniel M. Bernstein
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 240-240
Author(s):  
Natalija Pavlovic ◽  
Dragan Ignjatovic ◽  
Stevan Djenadic ◽  
Tomislav Subaranovic ◽  
Ivica Jakovljevic

Unprecedented floods in 2014 caused huge consequences on Serbian lignite opencast mines, such as halt of coal production and damages of the mining equipment. Three equipment revitalization options were urgently assessed to continue with coal production on opencast mine Tamnava-West Field. This paper compares the economic risks of the three investment options for lignite mine Tamnava-West Field mining equipment revitalization, based on this experience and probable risk of a repeated event. The results of the detailed quantitative risk analysis should verify the urgent decision and ranked with a multiple-criteria decision analysis.


Author(s):  
Natali Dilevski ◽  
Helen M. Paterson ◽  
Sarah A. Walker ◽  
Celine van Golde

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 643-653
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Deck ◽  
Helen M. Paterson
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna Calado ◽  
Timothy John Luke ◽  
Deb Connolly ◽  
Sara Landström ◽  
Henry Otgaar

Research to date has exclusively focused on the implantation of false memories for single events. The current experiment is the first proof of concept that false memories can be implanted for repeated autobiographical experiences using an adapted false memory implantation paradigm. We predicted that false memory implantation approaches for repeated events would generate fewer false memories compared to the classic implantation method for single events. We assigned students to one of three implantation conditions in our study: Standard, Repeated, and Gradual. Participants underwent three interview sessions with a 1-week interval between sessions. In the Standard condition, we exposed participants to a single-event implantation method in all three interviews. In the Repeated condition, participants underwent a repeated-event implantation method in the three interviews. The Gradual condition also consisted of a repeated-event implantation method, however, in the first interview alone, we suggested to participants that they had experienced the false narrative once. Surprisingly, within our sample, false memories rates in the Standard condition were not higher compared to the Repeated and Gradual conditions. Although sometimes debated, our results imply that false memories for repeated events can be implanted in lab conditions, likely with the same ease as false memories for single events.


Memory ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Rubínová ◽  
Hartmut Blank ◽  
James Ost ◽  
Ryan J. Fitzgerald
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document