Strategi Pembangunan Dan Pengembangan Permukiman Dalam Penanganan Permukiman Kumuh Di Jawa Timur

AbstrakPermukiman kumuh merupakan wilayah yang lahir karena kegagalan pembangunan, kemiskinan dan tingkat kepadatan penduduk tinggi. Seperti yang kita ketahui, permukiman kumuh tidak memenuhi kriteria permukiman layak huni. Penelitian ini akan membahas bagaimana strategi pembangunan dan pengembangan infrastruktur permukiman oleh pemerintah daerah dalam penanganan permukiman kumuh di Jawa Timur. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan cara deskriptif analisis melalui data yang diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan. Hasil dari studi kepustakan merupakan komparatif program pemerintah dari dua wilayah yaitu Kabupaten Sidoarjo dan Kota Malang. Berdasarkan hasil studi komparatif dari kedua wilayah tersebut dapat diketahui pelaksanaan program KOTAKU (Kota Tanpa Kumuh) dan capaian yang telah diperoleh kedua wilayah tersebut.Kata Kunci: Pembangunan; Infrastruktur; Permukiman Kumuh; AbstractSlums are areas that were born because of development failure, poverty and high population density. As we know, slums do not meet the criteria for habitation. This research will discuss how the development strategy and development of settlement infrastructure by local governments in handling slums in East Java. This Study uses a qualitative method by means of descriptive analysis through data obtained from literatur studies. The result of the literatur study are comparative government programs from two regions namely Sidoarjo Regency and Malang city. Based on the result of a comparative study of the two regions, it can be seen the implementation of the KOTAKU (City Without Slums) program and the achievements that have been obtained by the two regions. Keywords: Development; Infrastructure; Slums;

What a Long Strange Trip It’s Been

This chapter consists of a brief intellectual history setting the context for the following chapters. It describes the author’s journey from traditional public administration to policy networks to governance and the development of the author’s career as political scientist. Along the way there were various diversions and the author briefly describes his work on the ESRC’s Whitehall Programme, comparative government, and the study of the British executive. The chapter concludes that the discipline of public administration has survived and even thrived because some of its leading players mastered the ‘trick’ of linking policy to academic theory. We may specialize in central–local relationships, public service delivery, or other topics of the day, but we must link such topics to broader agendas in the social and human sciences. Otherwise we become either mere technicians or loyal servants of power or, of course, both.

3 Engaging the Constitutive Laws of Others: Necessities, Ideas, Interests

The chapter explores some key junctures in the intellectual history of comparative public law in the early-modern and modern eras. It highlights how the interplay between intellectual inquisitiveness and instrumentalism has influenced many of the field’s epistemological leaps, from the first attempts in the 16th century to delineate a universal public law and to study comparative government in a methodical fashion (John Selden, Montesquieu, and Simón Bolívar, among others), to the current renaissance of comparative constitutional inquiry particularly in Europe, the United States, and Canada. The examples illustrate that comparative constitutional inquiry is best understood as being driven by a combination of intellectual innovation and a compatible political agenda or ideological outlook. In some instances, intellectual pursuit led the way with an instrumentalist goal or ideological agenda providing added impetus. In other instances, comparative constitutional inquiry was more directly driven by political interests, ambitions, and aspirations, writ small or large.