giant vesical calculus
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

39
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoaib Muhammad ◽  
Amman Yousaf ◽  
Mihir Tejanshu Shah ◽  
Rabia Nazim ◽  
Arif Qayyum

Abstract Background Intrauterine copper devices are a popular type of contraceptives, being in use for a long time. Migration of IUCD into the bladder is one of the many side effects of this contraceptive measure. Though a rare phenomenon, IUCD acting as a foreign body can cause stone formation in the bladder. Case presentation We present a 42-year-old female patient who presented with increased urinary frequency, dysuria, and suprapubic pain. Examination showed mild tenderness in the suprapubic region. On X-ray pelvis, she was found to have a giant stone covering IUCD in the bladder. She ultimately underwent cystolithotomy, and her IUCD with stone was removed. Consequently, she was discharged on the 4th postoperative day with a satisfactory condition. Conclusion Vesical calculus can form following migration of IUCD in the bladder. This article highlights the importance of careful insertion and follow-up investigation of IUCD. Radiological modalities like X-rays pelvis provide excellent visualization of the IUCD and can be used to confirm the accurate location of the contraceptive device.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 544-547
Author(s):  
Ajit Kumar Vidhyarthy ◽  
Tariq Hameed ◽  
Rohit Lal ◽  
Awadh Kumar ◽  
Shivanand Sahni ◽  
...  

Introduction: Giant urinary bladder calculus in an adult is an uncommon entity. The number of patients with giant bladder calculi has decreased over recent years owing to wider availability of healthcare and better diagnostic modalities. Case Report: We present a case of a young adult without any history of recurrent urinary tract infections or bladder outlet obstruction with giant vesical calculus who presented to the emergency department with gross hematuria, abdominal pain, and dysuria. Investigations revealed a large calculus in the urinary bladder, and suprapubic cystolithotomy was performed. A large stone of 6.5×6×5.5 centimeters, weighing 125 grams, was removed. On follow-up, the patient was free of any symptoms and cystoscopy was normal. Conclusion: Urinary outflow obstruction must be ruled out in all patients with giant vesical calculus. Patients without any predisposing condition should be treated as a separate entity and evaluated accordingly. Multiple surgical treatment modalities are available for bladder calculus patients. Treatment is personalised as per size of stone, number of stones, and associated comorbidities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 76-77
Author(s):  
Pradeepika Gangwar ◽  
Pushpendra Singh ◽  
Reena . ◽  
Shweta Agrawal

Author(s):  
Ankita Vergadia ◽  
Neeraj Bansal ◽  
Nitin Gupta

Author presented a case report of a 42-year-old male patient who presented with dysuria, heaviness in lower abdomen since last 3 years associated with pain over bilateral lumber region since 2 years. He had history of recurrent urinary tract infection for last 6 months with blood in urine occasionally. Routine urine examination detected red and white blood cells with culture growth of E. coli. Ultrasound of abdomen confirmed the presence of vesical calculus of 10x7x5 cm.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Praveen Jhanwar ◽  
Vivek Parasher ◽  
Rahul Khatri ◽  
Vikas Gupta

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document