center bias
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

32
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2709
Author(s):  
Rotem Mairon ◽  
Ohad Ben-Shahar
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 089443932110088
Author(s):  
Ilo Alexandre ◽  
Joseph Jai-sung Yoo ◽  
Dhiraj Murthy

Twitter gained new levels of political prominence with Donald J. Trump’s use of the platform. Although previous work has been done studying the content of Trump’s tweets, there remains a dearth of research exploring who opinion leaders were in the early days of his presidency and what they were tweeting about. Therefore, this study retroactively investigates opinion leaders on Twitter during Trump’s 1st month in office and explores what those influencers tweeted about. We uniquely used a historical data set of 3 million tweets that contained the word “trump” and used Latent Dirichlet Allocation, a probabilistic algorithmic model, to extract topics from both general Twitter users and opinion leaders. Opinion leaders were identified by measuring eigenvector centrality and removing users with fewer than 10,000 followers. The top 1% users with the highest score in eigencentrality ( N = 303) were sampled, and their attributes were manually coded. We found that most Twitter-based opinion leaders are either media outlets/journalists with a left-center bias or social bots. Immigration was found to be a key topic during our study period. Our empirical evidence underscores the influence of bots on social media even after the 2016 U.S. presidential election, providing further context to ongoing revelations and disclosures about influence operations during that election. Furthermore, our results provide evidence of the continued relevance of established, “traditional” media sources on Twitter as opinion leaders.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1733
Author(s):  
Ohad Ben-Shahar ◽  
Rotem Meiron
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 814
Author(s):  
Rotem Mairon ◽  
Ohad Ben-Shahar
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Qi Sun ◽  
Huihui Zhang ◽  
David Alais ◽  
Li Li

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 250-257
Author(s):  
Saad Moughal ◽  
Mohamad Bashir

The correlation between intracranial and aortic aneurysms remains elusive. Data in the literature are scattered, and outcome reporting is swamped with heterogeneity and single-center bias. This calamity is adding to confusion on decision-making and delays the instigation of appropriate clinical applications. This literature review delves into the abyss of the lack of clinically driven scientific input, and highlights the trends explored thus far.


Drones ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Flore Perrin ◽  
Vassilios Krassanakis ◽  
Lu Zhang ◽  
Vincent Ricordel ◽  
Matthieu Perreira Da Silva ◽  
...  

The fast and tremendous evolution of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery gives place to the multiplication of applications in various fields such as military and civilian surveillance, delivery services, and wildlife monitoring. Combining UAV imagery with study of dynamic salience further extends the number of future applications. Indeed, considerations of visual attention open the door to new avenues in a number of scientific fields such as compression, retargeting, and decision-making tools. To conduct saliency studies, we identified the need for new large-scale eye-tracking datasets for visual salience in UAV content. Therefore, we address this need by introducing the dataset EyeTrackUAV2. It consists of the collection of precise binocular gaze information (1000 Hz) over 43 videos (RGB, 30 fps, 1280 × 720 or 720 × 480). Thirty participants observed stimuli under both free viewing and task conditions. Fixations and saccades were then computed with the dispersion-threshold identification (I-DT) algorithm, while gaze density maps were calculated by filtering eye positions with a Gaussian kernel. An analysis of collected gaze positions provides recommendations for visual salience ground-truth generation. It also sheds light upon variations of saliency biases in UAV videos when opposed to conventional content, especially regarding the center bias.


2020 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. 243-265
Author(s):  
Jane Wangui Mugo ◽  
Franklin J. Opijah ◽  
Joshua Ngaina ◽  
Faith Karanja ◽  
Mary Mburu

2019 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Elias S. Saba ◽  
John P. Marinelli ◽  
Christine M. Lohse ◽  
Michael J. Link ◽  
Matthew L. Carlson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document