robotic pyelolithotomy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

24
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 192.e1-192.e5
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Roth ◽  
Patricio C. Gargollo ◽  
Daniel G. DaJusta ◽  
Bruce W. Lindgren ◽  
Paul H. Noh ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Michele Zazzara ◽  
Giuseppe Cardo ◽  
Giovanni Pagliarulo ◽  
Arjan Nazaraj ◽  
Francesco P. Maselli ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Schulster ◽  
Daniel A. Sidhom ◽  
Kathryn Sturgeon ◽  
James F. Borin ◽  
Marc A. Bjurlin

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. e2461
Author(s):  
A. Olivero ◽  
F. Balzarini ◽  
R. Malinarić ◽  
P. Traverso ◽  
C. Terrone

Urology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan D. Garisto ◽  
Julien Dagenais ◽  
Hans Arora ◽  
Riccardo Bertolo ◽  
Jihad H. Kaouk

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-110
Author(s):  
Ahmed Adam ◽  
Deshin Reddy

Background: To describe a simple, novel stone extraction technique using the transvaginal route for large renal calculi encountered during laparoscopic/robotic pyelolithotomy. Methods: After a standard approach laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in a patient with a large (42 × 36 mm) pelvic calculus, Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was performed. A transverse posterior colpotomy was performed laparoscopically with the assistance of the Colpassist Vaginal Positioning Device (Boston Scientific) and the calculus was extracted, intact, through the vagina with the aid of an endoscopic retrieval bag. The vaginal incision was then closed intra-corporeally. A systematic review on the topic was also performed. Results: The stone was removed in its entirety through an occult vaginal incision. There were no complications reported and the patient was stone free at follow-ups. Conclusions: This simple, novel technique is an easily reproducible method, for the removal of large urinary calculi during either traditional laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic stone surgery in the appropriate female patient. It avoids the need for additional abdominal incisions or complex techniques involving lithotripsy which may be more complicated and time consuming. All previously published stone extraction techniques for large calculi (greater than 20 mm) within this systematic review are also critically appraised.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document