intelligent wells
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

92
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (09) ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
Judy Feder

The concept of a standalone production system on the seabed with automated wellbore construction and production processes has been an industry goal for a long time. Electrification of subsea facilities and of wellbore and reservoir equipment offers many opportunities to improve operational efficiency, reduce life-of-field capital and operating expenses, and reduce carbon footprint, among other benefits. Talk of a subsea electrification revolution being “just around the corner” has been ongoing for more than 20 years. And, millions of dollars in investments and numerous joint industry projects (JIPs) over the past decade have moved the vision closer to fruition (Fig. 1). But the upstream industry continues to lag others in replacing hydraulics with electrics. The reasons echo those for slow uptake of other new technologies and methodologies—fear of change, the unknown, and failure. Now, recent events are stirring up interest and expectations. “Four to five years ago, only a very small percentage of the buying community were making big noises about the future state of the electrified subsea or subsurface,” said John Kerr, subsea production systems and technology director for Baker Hughes, in a recent interview. “During the past 18 months the narrative has increased rapidly with many more operators looking at electrification as the base case for subsea solutions. We’ve seen a groundswell of interest to the point that we now see 3-, 5-, and 7-year lookaheads with electric solutions as the base case design concept,” Kerr said. What has changed? “Electrification of subsea devices has always been a solution to solve specific technical needs,” said Kerr. “The predominant one was extreme long-distance stepouts, where once you get to 250 miles or so, the ability to pump hydraulic fluids through small umbilicals presented so much pressure loss that it became impractical to implement a hydraulic solution, so all-electric became the solution of choice. Now we are seeing much more understanding of what electrification can deliver in the commercial and operational sense. “During the last 2 years, there has also been rapid adoption of dialogue around the aspect of increased carbon credentials and carbon reduction as an advantage,” Kerr continued. “The interest is much more comprehensive, driving different behavior in concept selection for operators.” Has the pandemic played a role? The consensus of participants in a subsea electrification panel at the virtual 2020 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (ATCE) was that unless you’re surrounded by a crisis, you’re not encouraged to change. “The moment you put someone in a crisis situation, they understand that they have to change,” said Rory Mackenzie, leader for subsea electrical technologies at Total. “2020—the pandemic, oil price collapse, and environmental issues—this created a crisis. People are now much more open to considering change.” The panelists included Alvaro Arrazola, completions engineer, Chevron, North America Upstream; Glenn-Roar Halvorsen, project manager subsea all-electric, Equinor; Christina Johansen, managing director, Norway, TechnipFMC; Samantha McClean, intelligent wells technical advisor, BP; Rory Mackenzie, head of subsea electrical technologies, Total R&D; and Thomas Scott, global product line director, intelligent production systems and reservoir information, Baker Hughes. Edward O’Malley, director of strategy and portfolio, oilfield services, Baker Hughes, moderated the session.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alhaji S Grema ◽  
Abubakar S Kolo ◽  
Usman H Taura ◽  
Modu B Grema

The efficiency of water flooding processes can be improved by installing intelligent wells which are good candidates for control and optimization. Optimal control theory based on adjoint formulations was found to be efficient for reservoir optimization. However, this solution approach is local and may not be suitable for comparing design alternatives. In this work, an approach for determining an optimal starting point for optimal control theory procedure was developed to give near global optima. The performance in terms of net present value (NPV) of two forms of five-spot pattern was compared. The method results to similar performances of the two alternatives because it was formulated to give true optimal solution trajectories. It was found that regular five-spot pattern results to a NPV in excess of $4,900 over inverted design. Respective increase in oil and water productions of 0.23% and 0.22% were recorded for former design against the later.Keywords: intelligent wells; adjoint; optimal control theory; global optimum; water flooding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-170
Author(s):  
Reza Malakooti ◽  
Ahmad Zhafran Ayop ◽  
Belladonna Maulianda ◽  
Khafiz Muradov ◽  
David Davies

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Byakov ◽  
Denis Eliseev ◽  
Aleksandr Senkov ◽  
Rustem Shafikov ◽  
Aleksandr Mavrin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cenk Temizel ◽  
Celal Hakan Canbaz ◽  
Yildiray Palabiyik ◽  
Mazda Irani ◽  
Karthik Balaji ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksej Danilko ◽  
Alexandr Senkov ◽  
Alexey Andreev
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Byakov ◽  
Denis Eliseev ◽  
Aleksandr Senkov ◽  
Rustem Shafikov ◽  
Aleksandr Mavrin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksej Danilko ◽  
Alexandr Senkov ◽  
Alexey Andreev
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document