Canadian Melanoma Conference Recommendations on High-Risk Melanoma Surveillance: A Report from the 14th Annual Canadian Melanoma Conference; Banff, Alberta; 20–22 February 2020

Introduction: There are a lack of established guidelines for the surveillance of high-risk cutaneous melanoma patients following initial therapy. We describe a novel approach to the development of a national expert recommendation statement on high-risk melanoma surveillance (HRS). Methods: A consensus-based, live, online voting process was undertaken at the 13th and 14th annual Canadian Melanoma Conferences (CMC) to collect expert opinions relating to “who, what, where, and when” HRS should be conducted. Initial opinions were gathered via audience participation software and used as the basis for a second iterative questionnaire distributed online to attendees from the 13th CMC and to identified melanoma specialists from across Canada. A third questionnaire was disseminated in a similar fashion to conduct a final vote on HRS that could be implemented. Results: The majority of respondents from the first two iterative surveys agreed on stages IIB to IV as high risk. Surveillance should be conducted by an appropriate specialist, irrespective of association to a cancer centre. Frequency and modality of surveillance favoured biannual visits and Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography (PET/CT) with brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) among the systemic imaging modalities available. No consensus was initially reached regarding the frequency of systemic imaging and ultrasound of nodal basins (US). The third iterative survey resolved major areas of disagreement. A 5-year surveillance schedule was voted on with 92% of conference members in agreement. Conclusion: This final recommendation was established following 92% overall agreement among the 2020 CMC attendees.

Interdisciplinary Surveillance of Ocular Melanomas: Experiences in a German Tertiary Centre

Background In contrast to cutaneous melanoma, there are no uniform guidelines regarding surveillance of ocular (uveal, conjunctival) melanomas. A consented standard operating procedure (SOP) by the “Netzwerk onkologische Spitzenzentren” Germany only exists for conjunctival melanoma but not for uveal melanoma. Surveillance is partially based on German S3-guidelines for cutaneous melanoma and is carried out by oncologic centres in a multidisciplinary approach. This study aims to evaluate patientsʼ adherence to surveillance programs and whether surveillance recommendations (examinations, intervals) can be realised. Methods Retrospective analysis of all ocular melanoma patients overseen at the University Hospital of Cologne between 2008 and 2019. The study evaluates rates of successful patient integration into a standardized surveillance program and patientsʼ surveillance adherence, subject to age, gender, primary therapy and tumour entity, respectively. Results 99 patients were included (56 female, 43 male), 83 of which had uveal melanomas and 16 conjunctival melanomas. Mean follow-up was 59 months. 81% of patients were integrated into a surveillance program. Surveillance was performed according to published recommendations in 78%. 13% of patients dropped out of the surveillance program after a mean period of 38 months. Conclusions Our data show a growing number of patients in standardized surveillance. However, there are still gaps. There is a need for guidelines specifically designed for ocular melanomas, allowing centres to offer patients an individualized approach.