Brain aging comprises many modes of structural and functional change with distinct genetic and biophysical associations

Brain imaging can be used to study how individuals’ brains are aging, compared against population norms. This can inform on aspects of brain health; for example, smoking and blood pressure can be seen to accelerate brain aging. Typically, a single ‘brain age’ is estimated per subject, whereas here we identified 62 modes of subject variability, from 21,407 subjects’ multimodal brain imaging data in UK Biobank. The modes represent different aspects of brain aging, showing distinct patterns of functional and structural brain change, and distinct patterns of association with genetics, lifestyle, cognition, physical measures and disease. While conventional brain-age modelling found no genetic associations, 34 modes had genetic associations. We suggest that it is important not to treat brain aging as a single homogeneous process, and that modelling of distinct patterns of structural and functional change will reveal more biologically meaningful markers of brain aging in health and disease.

Brain aging comprises many modes of structural and functional change with distinct genetic and biophysical associations

Brain imaging can be used to study how individuals’ brains are aging, compared against population norms. This can inform on aspects of brain health; for example, smoking and blood pressure can be seen to accelerate brain aging. Typically, a single “brain age” is estimated per subject, whereas here we we identified 62 modes of subject variability, from 21,407 subjects’ multimodal brain imaging data in UK Biobank. The modes represent different aspects of brain aging, showing distinct patterns of functional and structural brain change, and distinct patterns of association with genetics, lifestyle, cognition, physical measures and disease. While conventional brain-age modelling found no genetic associations, 34 modes had genetic associations. We suggest that it is important not to treat brain aging as a single homogeneous process, and that modelling of distinct patterns of structural and functional change will reveal more biologically meaningful markers of brain aging in health and disease.

Harmonization of large multi-site imaging datasets: Application to 10,232 MRIs for the analysis of imaging patterns of structural brain change throughout the lifespan

As medical imaging enters its information era and presents rapidly increasing needs for big data analytics, robust pooling and harmonization of imaging data across diverse cohorts with varying acquisition protocols have become critical. We describe a comprehensive effort that merges and harmonizes a large-scale dataset of 10,232 structural brain MRI scans from participants without known neuropsychiatric disorder from 18 different studies that represent geographic diversity. We use this dataset and multi-atlas-based image processing methods to obtain a hierarchical partition of the brain from larger anatomical regions to individual cortical and deep structures and derive normative age trends of brain structure through the lifespan (3 to 96 years old). Critically, we present and validate a methodology for harmonizing this pooled dataset in the presence of nonlinear age trends. We provide a web-based visualization interface to generate and present the resulting age trends, enabling future studies of brain structure to compare their data with this normative reference of brain development and aging, and to examine deviations from normative ranges, potentially related to disease.

Structural Brain Imaging and the Prevention of Schizophrenia: Can We Identify Neuroanatomical Markers for Young People at Risk for the Development of Schizophrenia?

Objective To examine the potential role of measures derived from structural brain imaging as phenotypic markers for the development of schizophrenia. Method Literature review of results of MRI-based assessments of brain structure in patients with schizophrenia, their first-degree relatives and factors that affect interpretation of such results. Results Reliable differences in brain structure can be detected in patients with schizophrenia, including those experiencing a first episode of psychosis. Further research is required to determine whether these differences are progressive, how they relate to potential confounding factors such as comorbid substance abuse and the functional consequences of the relatively subtle changes observed. Conclusions Further research is needed before structural brain change can be considered as a phenotypic marker for those at risk of developing schizophrenia. Large-scale collaborative research in clinical and normal volunteer groups using standardised assessment protocols would enable the early identification of those findings with predictive power in at-risk populations.