acrylamide analysis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
W.-C. Cheng ◽  
Y.-M. Kao ◽  
D.Y.-C. Shih ◽  
S.-S. Chou ◽  
A.-I. Yeh
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 239 ◽  
pp. 208-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Rashidi Nodeh ◽  
Wan Aini Wan Ibrahim ◽  
Muhammad Afzal Kamboh ◽  
Mohd Marsin Sanagi

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdalla A. Elbashir ◽  
Mei M Ali Omar ◽  
Wan Aini Wan Ibrahim ◽  
Oliver J. Schmitz ◽  
Hassan Y. Aboul-Enein

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 315-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodica Cuciureanu ◽  
Anca Irina Burlacu ◽  
Patricia Fitterman ◽  
Michel Larroque

2005 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M Owen ◽  
Laurence Castle ◽  
Janet Kelly ◽  
Lesley Wilson ◽  
Antony S Lloyd

Abstract Six proficiency tests have now been completed in an ongoing program of the UK Food Analysis Performance Assessment Scheme (FAPAS®) for the analysis of acrylamide in a range of food matrixes. Homogeneous test material samples were requested by laboratories throughout the world, with 29 to 45 submitting results for each test. Results were analyzed by appropriate statistical procedures, and z-scores were awarded for reported values. In the absence of both legislation and collaborative trial data, the target standard deviation was derived from the Horwitz equation, although it is acknowledged that there is a need to establish a “fit for purpose” target standard deviation specifically for acrylamide analysis. Participants were encouraged to use the analytical method routinely used in their own laboratory and to provide details of their procedure. Close examination of the data submitted indicates that performance is generally acceptable in terms of accuracy. There is no significant difference between results submitted by gas chromatography and liquid chromatography (GC and LC) methods, and no method dependency on the use of internal standards or sample size. However, choice of extraction solvent may be important, with indications that plain water is an acceptable extraction method. There is evidence from the most recent test that direct (underivatized) GC methodology may present problems, but more data are required and this aspect will be monitored in the continuing proficiency testing program.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document