Andexanet Alfa Use for Small Bowel Obstruction Patient With History of Sugiura Procedure

ABSTRACT This case report is about a 51-year-old active duty male with JAK2 mutation and medical history significant for prehepatic portal hypertension from portal vein thrombus on lifelong anticoagulation with rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, presenting with closed-loop small bowel obstruction requiring emergent laparotomy. We present this surgical case as it required emergent reversal of the oral factor Xa inhibitor with andexanet alfa.

Selective Esophagogastric Devascularization in the Modified Sugiura Procedure for Patients with Cirrhotic Hemorrhagic Portal Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Aim. Portal hypertension is a series of syndrome commonly seen with advanced cirrhosis, which seriously affects patient’s quality of life and survival. This study was designed to access the efficacy and safety of selective esophagogastric devascularization in the modified Sugiura procedure for patients with cirrhotic hemorrhagic portal hypertension. Methods. Sixty patients with hepatitis B cirrhotic hemorrhagic portal hypertension and meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and randomly divided by using computer into the selective modified Sugiura group (sMSP group, n = 30) and the modified Sugiura group (MSP group, n = 30). The primary endpoint measurement is the postoperative rebleeding rate. Secondary endpoint measurements included free portal venous pressure, liver Child–Pugh score, liver volume, portal vein width and blood flow velocity, survival rate, quality of life, and dysphagia as well as other complications one year postoperatively. This trial is registered with ChiCTR, number ChiCTR2000033468. Results. There was no statistically significant difference in rebleeding rates within one year after surgery between patients in the sMSP and MSP groups (χ = 0.11, p = 0.73 ). In comparison with the MSP group, the Child–Pugh score of liver function in the sMSP group significantly increased (χ = 6.4, p = 0.04 ) and the incidence of dysphagia was significantly reduced (χ = 6.23, p = 0.01 ) one year after surgery. There was a statistically significant difference in the quality of life between the two groups. However, there were no statistically significant differences in free portal venous pressure (MD = −3.44, 95% CI: −7.87 to 0.98, p = 0.12 ), postoperative liver volume (3 months: MD = -258.81, 95% CI: −723.21 to 205.57, p = 0.24 ; 1 year: MD = −320.12, 95% CI: −438.43 to 102.78, p = 0.16 ), postoperative portal vein width (3 months: MD = −0.06, p = 0.50 ; 1 year: MD = 0.17, p = 0.21 ), portal vein flow velocity (3 months: MD = 1.64, p = 0.21 ; 1 year: MD = −1.19, p = 0.57 ), 1-year survival rate (χ = 1.01, p = 0.31 ), and other complications between the two groups. Conclusions. Selective esophagogastric devascularization in the modified Sugiura procedure may not lower the incidence of rebleeding in the short term based on our findings. However, it may significantly improve quality of life of patients with cirrhotic hemorrhagic portal hypertension, improve liver function, and reduce postoperative dysphagia.

Left-sided portal hypertension due to retroperitoneal fibrosis treated with an oesophagus preserving, modified Sugiura procedure

Left-sided portal hypertension is a very uncommon condition and retroperitoneal fibrosis has rarely been reported as a cause. We present the case of a 77-year-old man with retroperitoneal fibrosis obstructing the splenic vein and causing recurrent episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Computed tomography showed a retroperitoneal mass as being responsible for the obstruction of the splenic vein, splenomegaly, and diffuse varices around the gastrosplenic and gastrohepatic ligaments. An oesophagus preserving, modified Sugiura procedure was performed with disconnection of the gastric vessels on the lesser curve of the stomach, preserving the pylorus branches of the nerves of Latarjet.

Elective Splenectomy Combined with Modified Hassab’s or Sugiura Procedure for Portal Hypertension in Decompensated Cirrhosis

Objective. Portal hypertension is a major complication of decompensated cirrhosis. In China, modified Hassab’s and Sugiura procedure are the two major methods of nonshunting surgery. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the two procedures for portal hypertension.Method. Between January 1994 and December 2009, 172 elective patients diagnosed with decompensated cirrhosis with significant hypersplenism adopted elective splenectomy for hypersplenism, and also modified Hassab’s (n= 91) or Sugiura (n= 81) procedure was additionally performed to reduce the risk of variceal bleeding. Postoperative mortality and morbidity data were collected, and a retrospectively comparative analysis was conducted.Results. All of the patients were treated successfully without death during operation, and no variceal bleeding occurred during hospitalization. There were 4 (4.4%) deaths in Hassab’s group and 3 (3.7%) deaths in Sugiura group postoperatively (P > 0.05). During follow-up, the survival rate was 90.2%, 82.42%, and 71.43% in Hassab’s group and 96.29%, 81.48%, and 75.31% in Sugiura group in 1, 3, and 5 years (P > 0.05). There were 22/71 and 12/63 patients in each groups who suffered no deadly variceal bleeding (P = 0.11). Bleeding related death and no bleeding related death occurred in 7/23 and 3/13 patients in each group (P = 0.26 and 0.14, respectively).Conclusion.Elective splenectomy combined with modified Sugiura procedure seemed to be associated with a reduced trend of no deadly variceal bleeding compared with Hassab’s procedure. As statistical significance was not found, further large scale and prospective study was warranted.

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of the Modified Sugiura Procedure and the Hassab Procedure for Treatment of Rebleeding after Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Due to Portal Hypertension

Although the modified Sugiura procedure and Hassab procedure have been used for many years, it remains unclear as to which is more effective for the treatment of rebleeding due to portal hypertension (PHT) after endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL). Hence, we conducted a retrospective study to compare the efficacy of these two procedures for treatment of rebleeding due to PHTafter EVL. Of 66 patients diagnosed with PHT and rebleeding after EVL in our institute from January 2007 to January 2014, 31 underwent the modified Sugiura procedure (Group S), whereas 35 underwent the Hassab procedure (Group H). The surgical duration, blood loss volume, blood transfusion rate, postoperative complication rate, postoperative rebleeding rate, postoperative hospital stay, and long-term complication rates were compared between groups. Greater blood loss volume ( P = 0.036), higher blood transfusion rate ( P = 0.002), and longer surgical duration ( P < 0.001) were observed in Group S than in Group H. There was no significant difference in the rate of short-term postoperative rebleeding between the groups ( P = 0.695), although the rate of long-term rebleeding was lower ( P = 0.031) in Group S. Recurrence of esophageal varices in Group S was less frequent in Group H ( P = 0.002), although there was no significant difference between the groups in the rates of recurrence of gastric varices and other long-term complications ( P > 0.05). The modified Sugiura procedure is more effective than the Hassab procedure for the treatment of rebleeding after EVL.