True-False Set is a particular case of the Refined Neutrosophic Set

Borzooei, Mohseni Takallo, and Jun recently proposed a new type of set, called True-False Set [1], and they claimed it is a generalization of Neutrosophic Set [2]. We prove that this assertion is untrue. Actually it’s the opposite, the True-False Set is a particular case of the Refined Neutrosophic Set.

The Influence of Rice Husk on the Physical Properties of Portland Pozzoland Cement at the Cement Industry Scale

This study aims to determine the effect of rice husk as a source of substitute fuel on the manufacture of cement at the industry scale. The parameters tested include the physical properties of the cement consisting of the Blain fineness test, false set, cement setting time, and mortar compressive strength at 3, 7, and 28 days. The average values for the results of these tests on cement produced using rice husks as a substitute fuel were 380 m2/kg, 81%, 132 minutes, 253 minutes, and 225, 298, and 379 kg/cm2, respectively. Based on the test results, we have shown that rice husk ash has a good effect on the characteristics of cement type I which still meet the standards of SNI-2049-2015.

The Supreme Court’s Application of 'Ordinary Contract Principles' to the Issue of the Duration of Retiree Healthcare Benefits: Perpetuating the Interpretation/Gap-Filling Quagmire

32 ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law 299 (2017)The United States Supreme Court purported to apply "ordinary contract principles" in its decision reversing the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in M&G Polymers USA v. Tackett . The Sixth Circuit had held that plaintiffs, retired employees of M&G, were entitled to lifetime healthcare benefits under their union's agreement with M&G. According to the Supreme Court, the Sixth Circuit wrongly relied on a false set of "inferences" established in International Union v. Yard-Man, Inc. to find that "in the absence of extrinsic evidence to the contrary, the provisions of [the collective bargaining agreement] indicated an intent to vest retirees with lifetime benefits." The Supreme Court therefore remanded the case for a determination under "ordinary contract principles," and without the benefit of the inferences, what the parties’ intentions were with respect to the duration of retiree healthcare benefits.This Article documents the various errors of the Supreme Court in applying "ordinary contract principles." In doing so, the Article suggests how courts should proceed in contract cases like M&G. I will argue that "ordinary contract principles" should have led the Court, not to abandon what the Supreme Court called the "Yard-Man inferences," but to treat them as probative, along with all other evidence concerning the duration of healthcare benefits. Because of the Supreme Court's mistakes, its attempt to clear up the Sixth Circuit's treatment of the duration of retiree healthcare benefits undoubtedly failed. More litigation is likely inevitable.

Bernard Malamud's fiction and the rise of ethnic literary studies

The increasing visibility of a number of previously marginalized literary cultures is one of the most challenging developments in post-war American fiction. My dissertation deals with the novels of Bernard Malamud (1914–1986), a contemporary Jewish-American author, whose work is linked with this phenomenon as well as other significant trends in the recent literature of the United States. It is customary to think that ethnic authors write within the older realist or naturalist traditions. The new scholarship, however, claims that literary forms are not organically connected with ethnic groups. Jewish-American fiction offers much evidence that ethnicity and modernism form a false set of opposites.