symplectic characters
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

10.37236/7387 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Stokke

The classical Pieri formula gives a combinatorial rule for decomposing the product of a Schur function and a complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial as a linear combination of Schur functions with integer coefficients. We give a Pieri rule for describing the product of an orthosymplectic character and an orthosymplectic character arising from a one-row partition. We establish that the orthosymplectic Pieri rule coincides with Sundaram's Pieri rule for symplectic characters and that orthosymplectic characters and symplectic characters obey the same product rule. 


2012 ◽  
Vol 351 (1) ◽  
pp. 459-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhama Srinivasan ◽  
C. Ryan Vinroot

2011 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan de Gier ◽  
Anita Ponsaing

1995 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Burns

We fix a number field L and a finite group G, and write Cl (ℤL[G]) for the reduced Grothendieck group of the category of finitely generated projective ℤL[G]-modules. We let RG denote the ring of complex characters of G, with SG the additive subgroup which is generated by the irreducible symplectic characters. We shall say that an element c ∈ Cl (ℤL[G]) is ‘(arithmetically) realizable’ if there exists a tamely ramified Galois extension N/K of number fields with L ⊆ K and an identification Gal (N/K) →˜ G via which c is the class of some Gal (N/K)-stble ℤN-ideal. We let RL(G) denote the subgroup of Cl (ℤL[G]) which is generated by the realizable elements for varying N/K. Our interest in RL(G) arises from the fact that it is the largest subset of Cl (ℤL[G]) upon which the results of Chinburg and the author in [Bu, Ch] can be used to give an explicit module theoretic description of the action of the integral semi-group ring AL, G of the Adams-Cassou-Noguès-Taylor operators (ΨL, k): k ∈ ℤ, 2 × k if SG ≠ {0}}. Whilst the results of [Bu, Ch] can (at least partially) be understood ‘geometrically’ via the action of Bott cannibalistic elements on suitable Grothendieck groups (cf. [Ch, E, P, T], [Bu]), the underlying problem of finding an explicit module theoretic interpretation of the action of AL, G on all elements of Cl(ℤL[G]) is of course essentially algebraic in nature. It is in this context that we were originally motivated to investigate RL(G).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document