Nucleocapsid mutations in SARS-CoV-2 augment replication and pathogenesis.

While SARS-CoV-2 continues to adapt for human infection and transmission, genetic variation outside of the spike gene remains largely unexplored. This study investigates a highly variable region at residues 203-205 in SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. Recreating the alpha variant mutation in an early pandemic (WA-1) background, we found that the R203K-G204R mutation is sufficient to enhance replication, fitness, and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2. Importantly, the R203K-G204R mutation increases nucleocapsid phosphorylation, providing a molecular basis for these phenotypes. Notably, an analogous alanine substitution mutant also increases SARS-CoV-2 fitness and phosphorylation, suggesting that infection is enhanced through ablation of the ancestral RG motif. Overall, these results demonstrate that variant mutations outside spike are also key components in SARS-CoV-2 continued adaptation to human infection.

First evidence showing that Pepper vein yellows virus P4 protein is a movement protein

Background Plant viruses move through plasmodesmata (PD) to infect new cells. To overcome the PD barrier, plant viruses have developed specific protein(s) to guide their genomic RNAs or DNAs to path through the PD. Results In the present study, we analyzed the function of Pepper vein yellows virus P4 protein. Our bioinformatic analysis showed that the P4 protein contains an transmembrane domain, encompassing the amino acid residue 117-138. The P4 protein was found to target PD and form small punctates near walls. The P4 deletion mutant or the substitution mutant lost their function to produce punctates near the walls inside the fluorescent loci. The P4-YFP fusion was found to move from cell to cell in infiltrated leaves, and P4 could complement Cucumber mosaic virus movement protein deficiency mutant to move between cells. Conclustion Taking together, we consider that the P4 protein is a movement protein of Pepper vein yellows virus.

First evidence showing that Pepper vein yellows virus P4 protein is a movement protein

Background Plant viruses move through plasmodesmata (PD) to infect new cells. To overcome the PD barrier, plant viruses have developed specific protein(s) to guide their genomic RNAs or DNAs to path through the PD. Results In the present study, we analyzed the function of Pepper vein yellows virus P4 protein. Our bioinformatic analysis showed that the P4 protein contains an transmembrane domain, encompassing the amino acid residue 117-138. The P4 protein was found to target PD and form small punctates near walls. The P4 deletion mutant or the substitution mutant lost their function to produce punctates near the walls inside the fluorescent loci. The P4-YFP fusion was found to move from cell to cell in infiltrated leaves, and P4 could complement Cucumber mosaic virus movement protein deficiency mutant to move between cells. Conclustion Taking together, we consider that the P4 protein is a movement protein of Pepper vein yellows virus.

First evidence showing that Pepper vein yellows virus P4 protein is a movement protein

Background Plant viruses move through plasmodesmata (PD) to infect new cells. To overcome the PD barrier, plant viruses have developed specific protein(s) to guide their genomic RNAs or DNAs to path through the PD.Results In the present study, we analyzed the function of Pepper vein yellows virus P4 protein. Our bioinformatic analysis showed that the P4 protein contains an transmembrane domain, encompassing the amino acid residue 117-138. The P4 protein was found to target PD and form small punctates near walls. The P4 deletion mutant or the substitution mutant lost their function to produce punctates near the walls inside the fluorescent loci. The P4-YFP fusion was found to move from cell to cell in infiltrated leaves, and P4 could complement Cucumber mosaic virus movement protein deficiency mutant to move between cells.Conclusion Taking together, we consider that the P4 protein is a movement protein of Pepper vein yellows virus.

Extreme mechanical diversity of human telomeric DNA revealed by fluorescence-force spectroscopy

G-quadruplexes (GQs) can adopt diverse structures and are functionally implicated in transcription, replication, translation, and maintenance of telomere. Their conformational diversity under physiological levels of mechanical stress, however, is poorly understood. We used single-molecule fluorescence-force spectroscopy that combines fluorescence resonance energy transfer with optical tweezers to measure human telomeric sequences under tension. Abrupt GQ unfolding with K+in solution occurred at as many as four discrete levels of force. Added to an ultrastable state and a gradually unfolding state, there were six mechanically distinct structures. Extreme mechanical diversity was also observed with Na+, although GQs were mechanically weaker. Our ability to detect small conformational changes at low forces enabled the determination of refolding forces of about 2 pN. Refolding was rapid and stochastically redistributed molecules to mechanically distinct states. A single guanine-to-thymine substitution mutant required much higher ion concentrations to display GQ-like unfolding and refolded via intermediates, contrary to the wild type. Contradicting an earlier proposal, truncation to three hexanucleotide repeats resulted in a single-stranded DNA-like mechanical behavior under all conditions, indicating that at least four repeats are required to form mechanically stable structures.

Interactions between QnrB, QnrB Mutants, and DNA Gyrase

ABSTRACTPlasmid-encoded protein QnrB1 protects DNA gyrase from ciprofloxacin inhibition. Using a bacterial two-hybrid system, we evaluated the physical interactions between wild-type and mutant QnrB1, the GyrA and GyrB gyrase subunits, and a GyrBA fusion protein. The interaction of QnrB1 with GyrB and GyrBA was approximately 10-fold higher than that with GyrA, suggesting that domains of GyrB are important for stabilizing QnrB1 interaction with the holoenzyme. Sub-MICs of ciprofloxacin or nalidixic acid reduced the interactions between QnrB1 and GyrA or GyrBA but produced no reduction in the interaction with GyrB or a quinolone-resistant GyrA:S83L (GyrA with S83L substitution) mutant, suggesting that quinolones and QnrB1 compete for binding to gyrase. Of QnrB1 mutants that reduced quinolone resistance, deletions in the C or N terminus of QnrB1 resulted in a marked decrease in interactions with GyrA but limited or no effect on interactions with GyrB and an intermediate effect on interactions with GyrBA. While deletion of loop B and both loops moderately reduced the interaction signal with GyrA, deletion of loop A resulted in only a small reduction in the interaction with GyrB. The loop A deletion also caused a substantial reduction in interaction with GyrBA, with little effect of loop B and dual-loop deletions. Single-amino-acid loop mutations had little effect on physical interactions except for a Δ105I mutant. Therefore, loops A and B may play key roles in the proper positioning of QnrB1 rather than as determinants of the physical interaction of QnrB1 with gyrase.

Protein Kinase A-mediated Serine 35 Phosphorylation Dissociates Histone H1.4 from Mitotic Chromosome

Global histone H1 phosphorylation correlates with cell cycle progression. However, the function of site-specific H1 variant phosphorylation remains unclear. Our mass spectrometry analysis revealed a novel N-terminal phosphorylation of the major H1 variant H1.4 at serine 35 (H1.4S35ph), which accumulates at mitosis immediately after H3 phosphorylation at serine 10. Protein kinase A (PKA) was found to be a kinase for H1.4S35. Importantly, Ser-35-phosphorylated H1.4 dissociates from mitotic chromatin. Moreover, H1.4S35A substitution mutant cannot efficiently rescue the mitotic defect following H1.4 depletion, and inhibition of PKA activity increases the mitotic chromatin compaction depending on H1.4. Our results not only indicate that PKA-mediated H1.4S35 phosphorylation dissociates H1.4 from mitotic chromatin but also suggest that this phosphorylation is necessary for specific mitotic functions.

Pax8 protein stability is controlled by sumoylation

The transcription factor Pax8 is involved in the morphogenesis of the thyroid gland and in the maintenance of the differentiated thyroid phenotype. Despite the critical role played by Pax8 during thyroid development and differentiation, very little is known of its post-translational modifications and how these modifications may regulate its activity. We focused our attention on the study of a specific post-translational modification, i.e., sumoylation. Sumoylation is a dynamic and reversible process regulating gene expression by altering transcription factor stability, protein–protein interaction and subcellular localization of target proteins. The analysis of Pax8 protein sequence revealed the presence of one sumoylation consensus motif (ψKxE), strongly conserved among mammals, amphibians, and fish. We demonstrated that Pax8 is sumoylated by the addition of a single small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) molecule on its lysine residue 309 and that Pax8K309R, a substitution mutant in which the candidate lysine is replaced with an arginine, is no longer modified by SUMO. In addition, we analyzed whether protein inhibitor of activated signal transducers and activators of transcription (PIASy), a member of the PIAS STAT family of proteins, could function as a SUMO ligase and we demonstrated that indeed PIASy is able to increase the fraction of sumoylated Pax8. Interestingly, we show that Pax8 is targeted in the SUMO nuclear bodies, which are structures that regulate the nucleoplasmic concentration of transcription factors by SUMO trapping. Finally, we report here that the steady-state protein level of Pax8 is controlled by sumoylation.

Transcription Regulation by Tandem-Bound FNR at Escherichia coli Promoters

ABSTRACT FNR is an Escherichia coli transcription factor that regulates the transcription of many genes in response to anaerobiosis. We have constructed a series of artificial FNR-dependent promoters, based on the melR promoter, in which a consensus FNR binding site was centered at position −41.5 relative to the transcription start site. A second consensus FNR binding site was introduced at different upstream locations, and promoter activity was assayed in vivo. FNR can activate transcription from these promoters when the upstream FNR binding site is located at many different positions. However, sharp repression is observed when the upstream-bound FNR is located near positions −85 or −95. This repression is relieved by the FNR G74C substitution mutant, previously identified as being defective in transcription repression at the yfiD promoter. A parallel series of artificial FNR-dependent promoters, carrying a consensus FNR binding site at position −61.5 and a second upstream DNA site for FNR, was also constructed. Again, promoter activity was repressed by FNR when the upstream-bound FNR was located at particular positions.