The application of virtual reality technology in museum exhibition ——Take the Han Dynasty Haihunhou Ruins Museum in Nanchang as an example

The opening of the Haihunhou Relics Museum of The Han Dynasty in Nanchang showcases the largest, best-preserved and most abundant legal-marquis tombs of the Han Dynasty discovered in China, and exhibits the historical sites and precious cultural relics of the Han Dynasty in an undamaged manner. The tomb of Haihunhou reflects the splendid civilization of an era, which is of great significance to the study of Chinese politics, economy and culture in han Dynasty. The display of the Han Dynasty Haihunhou Ruins Museum in Nanchang also represents the display level of today's China. Nowadays, people are more and more interested in and want to visit ancient relics. However, it is difficult for traditional museums to display ancient relics and visitors cannot understand the historical stories behind them. With the development of contemporary science and technology and virtual reality technology, museum exhibits more tends to digital, intelligent technology, through the cultural relics of the display of virtual reality technology, brings to the sea faint principality of nanchang han dynasty ruins museum different presentation, more fully play of the museum's education value and historical responsibility.

Introduction

In China, religious practice is protected under the law only insofar as it is supervised by the state. In reality though, many Protestant churches are unregistered and informally tolerated by local public security bureaus. The empirical starting point of the book is to explain why local public security bureaus tolerate unregistered churches in Chinese cities. It discusses and refutes explanations in the study of Chinese politics and international relations that might address parts of this question. Those focus on the impact of international pressure on autocratic behavior, the principal-agent dilemma, the political economy of religion, social networks, and consultative authoritarianism. It finally introduces the argument, the methodology of the book, and its structure.

Review Essay: What Happened to the Study of China in Comparative Politics?

In 1986, Kenneth Lieberthal observed that the study of China in the United States had had little effect on the evolution of political science. Over twenty years later, its impact on the core debates in comparative politics seems to have been no more significant. Why have some of the most influential books in the study of contemporary Chinese politics not been significant in the discipline of comparative politics? Based on a quantitative overview of forty-two comparative politics syllabi, my argument is twofold. First, China scholarship has isolated the study of Chinese politics by primarily publishing in area journals, building analyses around debates exclusive to Chinese politics, and generating knowledge with limited contemplation of its potential for generalization outside China. Second, comparative politics seems to have been caught in a “democratic prism,” which has impeded scholars' ability to adapt some of the debates to empirical changes associated with China's rise and development.