COVID-19 and maternity care in South East London: shared working and learning initiative

The SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 pandemic has had an immediate and profound impact on how healthcare systems organise and deliver services and specifically, there is a disproportionate negative impact on Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic groups and other risk factors. This has required clinical leaders to respond at pace to meet patient’s care needs, while supporting staff working in a volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous environment. During the initial wave and then the later waves within our South East London sector, there were new challenges as everyone faced a novel disease necessitating real-time learning and reflection. Through informal conversations and networks, the clinicians highlighted in the first wave the need for a forum for clinical discussion. Using our existing South East London Local Maternity System and the evolving Maternal Medicine Networks alliance, we initiated a sharing and learning platform to support clinical decision-making for all maternity health professionals during the pandemic. Fortnightly, multidisciplinary virtual huddles were established allowing obstetric physicians, obstetricians, midwives and obstetric anaesthetists to share their clinical experience, operational and service challenges. This approach fostered and developed cross-site team working and shared learning across traditional, organisational boundaries. In South East London, prior to the introduction of universal testing in the first surge, we had a total of 65 confirmed positive cases of which 5 women were delivered due to COVID-19, 5 women required high dependency or intensive care and 3 women were intubated and ventilated. During the second and third waves, the COVID-19 Local Maternity System huddles provided monthly learning opportunities to share clinical practice, guidelines, vaccination updates and challenges with workforce. The huddles have proven to be a sustainable platform, which have built trust across the sector, facilitating effective teamwork and providing invaluable support for clinical decision-making. We describe the evolution of this structure and share our experience of working within this new clinical network during the first wave and how this established way of working facilitated collaboration during the second and third waves as staff and the system became more fatigued. The huddles have developed to become multi-professional, multisite collaborations with the whole group taking joint ownership to develop shared learning and are providing a forum for discussions for the emerging South East London’s Maternal Medicine Network.

Commentary: Implications of SARS-Cov-2 infection for pregnancy with diabetes: achievements and open questions for feto-maternal medicine

SARS-Cov-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus 2) infection confers a non-negligible risk for younger pregnant women with diabetes, which is still less well investigated. This topic was recently addressed by a systematic scoping review in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, aiming to summarize the complex interaction between SARS-Cov-2 infection, pregnancy and diabetes. This commentary will summarize and discuss the main findings of this article and its implications for future research.

AB0298 PREGNANCY IN RHEUMATIC DISEASE: A REGION WIDE SURVEY OF CURRENT PRACTICE AMONGST CLINICIANS IN THE WESSEX MULTI-DISCIPLINARY CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASE NETWORK

Background:Rheumatic diseases frequently affect females of child-bearing age, with implications for foetal and maternal outcomes.Two-thirds (66%) of the women who died in the 2016-18 MBRRACE report were known to have pre-existing medical problems1. The NHS long-term plan supports creation of Maternal Medicine Networks to facilitate access to specialist care and advice in pregnancy.Guidelines exist for use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) during pregnancy but other aspects of pregnancy related care in rheumatic disease remain less well defined. The Wessex wide connective tissue disease (CTD) network provides a multi-disciplinary forum to discuss cases, to obtain approval for high cost drugs, to compare practice in multiple hospitals but does not specifically discuss pregnancy related uncertainties.Objectives:To survey variations in clinical practice relating to rheumatic disease in pregnancyMethods:Following careful project planning with the tertiary referral centre obstetric lead consultant for maternal medicine, several areas of care were identified which were prone to local and individual variation. An anonymous online survey relating to these specific areas of pregnancy related care was circulated amongst members of the CTD network, including rheumatology consultants, rheumatology practitioners and specialist trainees.Results:16 responses were obtained across 7 hospital sites; 56% were from rheumatology consultants. 12/16 (75%) reported routinely offering contraceptive advice when prescribing DMARDs. Only 4/16 (25%) were aware of a specific pre-natal obstetric clinic available in their hospital. There was major variation in planned frequency of clinical review. 10/16 would increase frequency of review during pregnancy if a patient’s disease became active or unstable; 6/16 would aim to review patients approximately 3 monthly; 3/16 would not routinely increase frequency of review during pregnancy. Planned post-natal care was equally varied. 3/16 would routinely prescribe aspirin to all lupus women during pregnancy despite this being recommended for all women with SLE for prevention of pre-eclampsia2. Prescription of low molecular weight heparin was variable, and several responses were at odds with the current RCOG guidance on the subject3. 8/16 (50%) would prescribe corticosteroids judiciously in case of an acute disease flare.Conclusion:This survey has revealed significant variation in practice relating to rheumatic disease in pregnancy. Integrated care with colleagues from the regional referral centre for maternal medicine is required, in keeping with the recently published NICE guidance on the subject4. Adopting a hub and spoke model, with local centres working closely alongside a tertiary centre, will help optimise peri-partum care and outcome for patients with long-term rheumatic conditions.References:[1]Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk through Audits and Confidential Enquiries across the UK (MBRRACE-UK) Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care Maternal Report (December 2020). Available at https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/assets/downloads/mbrrace-uk/reports/maternal-report-2020/MBRRACE-UK_Maternal_Report_Dec_2020_v10.pdf [Accessed 28 January 2021][2]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2019) Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management (NICE guideline 133) Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng133 [Accessed 28 January 2021][3]Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2015) Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium (Green-top Guideline Number 37a) Available at https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg-37a.pdf [Accessed 5 January 2021][4]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2019) Intrapartum care for women with existing medical conditions or obstetric complications and their babies (NICE guideline 121) Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng121 [Accessed 5 January 2021]Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Obstetric Medicine

Pregnant women regularly present with medical problems to many different medical specialties, and as their physiology is changed by the pregnancy, so too is the way in which many chronic illnesses behave. This new specialist handbook, Obstetric Medicine, provides a comprehensive overview of medical conditions in the pregnant woman, and covers the syllabus for both the RCOG Advanced Training Skills Module (ATSM) and sub-specialty training in maternal medicine. This is an essential new addition to the literature for all physicians who work with pregnant women in their practice. It contains links to national and international guidelines, and provides evidence-based management strategies for both chronic and acute illnesses.

The Scales of Reproductive Justice: Casey’s Failure to Rebalance Liberty Interests in the Racially Disparate State of Maternal Medicine

Despite the maternal medicine crisis in the U.S., especially for Black women, legislatures are challenging constitutional abortion doctrine and forcing women to interact with a system that may cost them their lives. This Article proposes that because of abysmal maternal mortality rates and the arbitrary nature of most abortion restrictions, the right to choose an abortion is embedded in our Fourteenth Amendment right to not be arbitrarily deprived of life by the State. This Article is a call to abortion advocates to begin submitting state maternal mortality data when challenging abortion restrictions. The call for attention to life was central to the holding in Roe v. Wade and is central to rebalancing the scales of reproductive justice.