Peer review declaration

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind (please describe) Single-anonymous: authors’ identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers’ identities are hidden from authors • Conference submission management system: Via email messages between editor and authors and editor and reviewers. • Number of submissions received: 18 • Number of submissions sent for review: 18 • Number of submissions accepted:18 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100):100 • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.11 • Total number of reviewers involved:20 • Any additional info on review process: The following review criteria were suggested: • Are the scientific methods and assumptions valid and clearly outlined? • Are the results sufficient to support the interpretations and conclusions? • Is the overall presentation well structured and clear? • Is the description of experiments and calculations sufficiently complete and precise to allow their reproduction by fellow scientists (traceability of results)? • Are mathematical formulae, symbols, abbreviations, and units correctly defined and used? • Are the number and quality of references appropriate? • Contact person for queries: Name : Julian Gröbner Affiliation: Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos, World Radiation Center (PMOD/WRC), Davos Dorf, Switzerland. Email :[email protected]

Peer review declaration

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind Single-anonymous: authors' identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers' identities are hidden from authors Double-anonymous: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other Triple-blind: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other, and from the Editor(s) Open: author and reviewer identities are known to each other • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Some criteria when accepting/declining paper were including: (1). The depth of the research methods and results, (2). Whether the papers were written properly, (3). If the topics of the research matches our conference, (4). All the figures were correlated to the discussion. Time given to authors in resubmitting after revisions was approximately 1 month. • Conference submission management system: We use Easychair.org platform in managing our conference submission. Submissions were available for 2.5 months prior to conference date. We generally accepted all the papers submitted for presentation in the conference as long as they suit the theme. After conference, the review process was conducted by Reviewers. • Number of submissions received: 53 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 53 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 43 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 85% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 reviewers • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): • Contact person for queries: Mohammad Rohmaneo Darminto [email protected]/[email protected] Laboratory of Geoinformatics Department of Geomatics Engineering Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement. The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

Peer review declaration

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: AI Scholar System • Number of submissions received: 101 • Number of submissions sent for review: 97 • Number of submissions accepted: 56 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 55.4% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 40 • Any additional info on review process: • Step 1. Each of selected paper will be reviewed by two/three professional experts in the related subject area. • Step 2. Review Reports received from the experts will be judged by one of the editors either Review Reports are logical or not? • Step 3. If not logical, then editor can assign new reviewer or can also judge at his/her own. • Step 4. If logical, then Review Reports will be sent to authors to modify the manuscript accordingly. • Step 5. Authors will be required to revise their papers according to the points raised. • Step 6. Revised version will then be evaluated by the editor for the incorporation of the points raised by the reviewers. • Step 7. Then the editor will send the revised manuscript to the reviewers again for re-evaluation. • Step 8. If the reviewers approve the revise version of the manuscript, then will be accepted for publication. • Contact person for queries: Xuexia Ye [email protected] AEIC Academic Exchange Information Centre Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement. The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

Peer review declaration

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) The review process STS-37 papers was conducted by a single-blind process. It is means that only reviewers know the identity of authors, but the authors do not know who is reviewer. • Conference submission management system: All the submission and communication to all the STS-37 authors we did through conference email ([email protected]) • Number of submissions received: 180 • Number of submissions sent for review: 180 • Number of submissions accepted: 174 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 96 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 28 • Any additional info on review process: The papers which were recommended by the organizing committee of STS-37 were proposed for reviewing and publication in the volume for STS-37 conference. • Contact person for queries: Name : PhD Cheverda Vyacheslav Vladimirovich Affiliation: Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Email : [email protected].

Peer review declaration

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will publish the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe): Single Blind • Conference submission management system: Easy Chair • Number of submissions received: 121 • Number of submissions sent for review: 105 • Number of submissions accepted:77 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 63.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 113 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Mohammed JK BASHIR Affiliation: Faculty of Engineering and Green Technology (FEGT) Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak, Malaysia Email; [email protected]; [email protected] Tel: 605-4688888 ext:4559 Fax: 605-4667449

Peer review declaration

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Zmeeting submission system • Number of submissions received: 29 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 29 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 19 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 65.52% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 17 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: 1. Preliminary Review 2. The papers passed the first review will be reviewed again from the following aspects: Originality, Innovation, Technical Soundness, Applicability, Clarity of presentation and Relevance Contact person for queries: Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement. The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

Peer review declaration

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: AI Scholar System • Number of submissions received: 152 • Number of submissions sent for review: 147 • Number of submissions accepted: 83 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 54.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 50 • Any additional info on review process: • Step 1. Each of selected paper will be reviewed by two/three professional experts in the related subject area. • Step 2. Review Reports received from the experts will be judged by one of the editors either Review Reports are logical or not? • Step 3. If not logical, then editor can assign new reviewer or can also judge at his/her own. • Step 4. If logical, then Review Reports will be sent to authors to modify the manuscript accordingly. • Step 5. Authors will be required to revise their papers according to the points raised. • Step 6. Revised version will then be evaluated by the editor for the incorporation of the points raised by the reviewers. • Step 7. Then the editor will send the revised manuscript to the reviewers again for re-evaluation. • Step 8. If the reviewers approve the revise version of the manuscript, then will be accepted for publication. • Contact person for queries: Xuexia Ye [email protected] AEIC Academic Exchange Information Centre Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement. The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) All submitted papers will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, who are encouraged to give constructive comments and suggestions to the authors. The review is single-blind – the author doesn’t know the names of the reviewers assigned to the review of the paper. The authors of submitted papers will receive the review comments and recommendations and will have a possibility to amend their papers based on the review comments and suggestions and upload the revised versions. If both reviewers indicate that the paper can’t be published then it will not be accepted for publication, however, the talk might be delivered at the Conference if the reviewers specify that in the review. The publication of the papers in the Conference Proceedings is possible only in case the talk is presented at the Conference. • Conference submission management system: - Self-made submission management system • Number of submissions received: Number of full papers submitted for publication in IOP Conference Proceedings - 232 • Number of submissions sent for review: 232 • Number of submissions accepted: 172 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 74.13% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.9 • Total number of reviewers involved: 48 • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Anastasia Kaptsova Affiliation:ITMO University, Russia Email :[email protected]

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: To participate in the PIRT-2021 Conference, Participants had to register on the website http://www.pirt.info/?lang=eng#reg_form Abstracts and papers had to be sent to the PIRT-2021 Organizing Committee by e-mail: [email protected] All information about the format of abstracts and papers was on the web-site: http://www.pirt.info/?lang=eng • Number of submissions received: 61 • Number of submissions sent for review: 51 • Number of submissions accepted: 38 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 62,29 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:12 • Any additional info on review process: Plagiarism check system: antiplagiat.ru Authors could resubmit the paper with the necessary revisions. • Contact person for queries: Name : Professor Vladimir Olegovich Gladyshev Affiliation: Head of the Faculty of Fundamental Sciences, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 5, 2-nd Baumanskaya St., Moscow, 105005, Russian Federation Email : [email protected]

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will publish the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Easy Chair • Number of submissions received: 97 • Number of submissions sent for review: 73 • Number of submissions accepted: 38 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 39.17% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 51 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Nishu Gupta Affiliation: Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India Email : [email protected]