bound entanglement
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

96
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrix C. Hiesmayr

AbstractEntanglement detection in high dimensional systems is a NP-hard problem since it is lacking an efficient way. Given a bipartite quantum state of interest free entanglement can be detected efficiently by the PPT-criterion (Peres-Horodecki criterion), in contrast to detecting bound entanglement, i.e. a curious form of entanglement that can also not be distilled into maximally (free) entangled states. Only a few bound entangled states have been found, typically by constructing dedicated entanglement witnesses, so naturally the question arises how large is the volume of those states. We define a large family of magically symmetric states of bipartite qutrits for which we find $$82\%$$ 82 % to be free entangled, $$2\%$$ 2 % to be certainly separable and as much as $$10\%$$ 10 % to be bound entangled, which shows that this kind of entanglement is not rare. Via various machine learning algorithms we can confirm that the remaining $$6\%$$ 6 % of states are more likely to belonging to the set of separable states than bound entangled states. Most important we find via dimension reduction algorithms that there is a strong two-dimensional (linear) sub-structure in the set of bound entangled states. This revealed structure opens a novel path to find and characterize bound entanglement towards solving the long-standing problem of what the existence of bound entanglement is implying.


Author(s):  
Bihalan Bhattacharya ◽  
Suchetana Goswami ◽  
Rounak Mundra ◽  
Nirman Ganguly ◽  
Indranil Chakrabarty ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 126 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoya Imai ◽  
Nikolai Wyderka ◽  
Andreas Ketterer ◽  
Otfried Gühne
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 023032
Author(s):  
Alexander Streltsov

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Tendick ◽  
Hermann Kampermann ◽  
Dagmar Bruß
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aslı Tuncer ◽  
Mohsen Izadyari ◽  
Ceren B. Dağ ◽  
Fatih Ozaydin ◽  
Özgür E. Müstecaplıoğlu

2019 ◽  
Vol 383 (14) ◽  
pp. 1549-1554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amandeep Singh ◽  
Akanksha Gautam ◽  
Arvind ◽  
Kavita Dorai

Quantum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gael Sentís ◽  
Johannes N. Greiner ◽  
Jiangwei Shang ◽  
Jens Siewert ◽  
Matthias Kleinmann

Preparing and certifying bound entangled states in the laboratory is an intrinsically hard task, due to both the fact that they typically form narrow regions in state space, and that a certificate requires a tomographic reconstruction of the density matrix. Indeed, the previous experiments that have reported the preparation of a bound entangled state relied on such tomographic reconstruction techniques. However, the reliability of these results crucially depends on the extra assumption of an unbiased reconstruction. We propose an alternative method for certifying the bound entangled character of a quantum state that leads to a rigorous claim within a desired statistical significance, while bypassing a full reconstruction of the state. The method is comprised by a search for bound entangled states that are robust for experimental verification, and a hypothesis test tailored for the detection of bound entanglement that is naturally equipped with a measure of statistical significance. We apply our method to families of states of3×3and4×4systems, and find that the experimental certification of bound entangled states is well within reach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document