psychosocial need
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

14
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Law and World ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 166-183

The research problem of this article will address the specific issues related to mental health in a legal context. The aim of the research is to outline established practices and show us the situation in this regard. To achieve this goal, legal norms are reviewed, both internationally and domestically. Also, cases from court and reports of the Public Defender of Georgia. Research has shown that protecting the right to health is problematic. In particular, mental health services are less accessible and comprehensive. Although the legal framework imposes certain requirements, in practice there are breaches that lead to human rights violations. In particular, the current research revealed violations of the right to life and health. As well as facts of torture and inhuman treatment, both nationally and internationally. This article concludes by suggesting ways to address the problem, such as accessing additional funding for health services, with more controlled monitoring that will tightly control the enforcement of legal requirements. Based on the principle of the welfare state, the state should provide services that do not put people in a psychosocial need in a worse position. Finally, it should be noted that as a result of the research, specific issues related to mental health were identified, which were reviewed in a legal context. The practices that exist in the international and national levels were highlighted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Poorva Pradhan ◽  
Louise Sharpe ◽  
Phyllis N. Butow ◽  
Allan Ben Smith ◽  
Hayley Russell

Background: Fear of cancer recurrence or progression (FCR/P) is a common challenge experienced by people living with and beyond cancer and is frequently endorsed as the highest unmet psychosocial need amongst survivors. This has prompted many cancer organizations to develop self-help resources for survivors to better manage these fears through psychoeducation, but little is known about whether they help reduce FCR/P.Method: We recruited 62 women with ovarian cancer. Women reported on their medical history and demographic characteristics and completed the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF). They then read a booklet on FCR specifically created for Ovarian Cancer Australia by two of the authors (ABS and PB). One week after reading the booklet, 50/62 women (81%) completed the FoP-Q-SF and answered questions about their satisfaction with the booklet.Results: More than half of the women (35/62; 56.5%) scored in the clinical range for FCR/P at baseline. Of the completers, 93% said that they would recommend the booklet to other women. Satisfaction with the booklet was relatively high (75.3/100) and more than two-thirds of women rated it as moderately helpful or better. However, FCR/P did not change significantly over the week following reading the booklet [t(49) = 1.71, p = 0.09]. There was also no difference in change in FCR/P between women in the clinical vs. non-clinical range on the FoP-Q. Women high in FCR/P rated the booklet as less helpful in managing FCR/P (r = −0.316, p = 0.03), but overall satisfaction with the booklet was not associated with degree of FCR/P (r = −0.24, p = 0.10).Conclusions: These results suggest that a simple online FCR booklet is acceptable to women with ovarian cancer and they are satisfied with the booklet, but, it was insufficient to change in FCR/P levels. These results suggest that such resources are valued by women with ovarian cancer, but more potent interventions are necessary to reduce FCR in this population.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 263355652110177
Author(s):  
Bridget Kiely ◽  
Deirdre Connolly ◽  
Barbara Clyne ◽  
Fiona Boland ◽  
Patrick O’Donnell ◽  
...  

Introduction: Individuals with multimorbidity in deprived areas experience worse health outcomes and fragmented care. Research suggests that primary care-based link workers providing social prescribing have potential to improve health and well-being. This paper reports the results of a pilot study conducted in preparation for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that aims to test the effectiveness of primary care-based link workers providing social prescribing in improving health outcomes for people with multimorbidity who attend general practices in deprived areas in Ireland. Methods: An uncontrolled pilot study of an intervention based on the Glasgow Deep End links worker programme, in a single general practice, tested the feasibility and acceptability of planned processes for a RCT. Outcomes were recruitment and retention rates and acceptability of the trial processes and intervention to patients, general practitioners (GPs) and the link worker. Structured interviews were conducted with six patients, the link worker and two GPs within the practice and analysed using descriptive qualitative analysis. Feedback from a Public Patient Involvement group and an Implementation Advisory Group of key stakeholders was incorporated into the evaluation process. Results: Twelve out of 14 patients completed the intervention. Selection and recruitment processes were lengthier than expected. GPs recommended including psychosocial need in the selection process. Interviewed patients, the GPs and the link worker were positive about the intervention. Conclusion: A range of adaptations were identified for the main trial, mainly considering psychosocial need in the selection process to reflect normal referral pathways. This has resulted in a pragmatic RCT design.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 148-148
Author(s):  
Linda A. Jacobs ◽  
Abigail N. Blauch ◽  
Donna A. Pucci ◽  
Steven C Palmer

148 Background: Screening for psychosocial issues has been mandated to identify survivors in need of assistance and improve outcomes. Although screening identifies some individuals at risk for difficulties, many who screen positively ultimately decline intervention. Moreover, screening has the potential to "miss" patients who desire intervention but screen negatively for psychosocial need. We explored these issues among a sample of adult survivors of P-AYA cancer. Methods: Survivors of P-AYA cancer > 2 years from end of treatment completed an assessment including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and desire for assistance with Anxiety and Depression following a survivorship visit. HADS subscale scores of > 8 indicated at least mild symptoms. Results: Participants (N = 237) were predominately white (89%), college educated (76%), single (63%), and had an annual income of > $60,000 (69%). A plurality had diagnoses of leukemia (30%) or Hodgkin's lymphoma (29%) treated 17 years previously. Treatment included surgery (35%), chemotherapy (91%), XRT (59%), and BMT (17%). Anxiety (M = 6.02; SD = 3.07) and depression (M = 2.54; SD = 2.85) scores were low and below the cutpoint of 8 (all t < -7.8; p < .001 ), although 21% and 9% screened positively for anxiety or depression, respectively. Screening positive for anxiety was associated with a desire for intervention (X2 = 20.77; p < .001 ), while screening positively for depression was not (p > 0.05). Among those screening positively for anxiety, 50% desired intervention, while among those screening positively for depression only 38% desired intervention. Moreover, among those desiring intervention for anxiety or depression, 36% and 68% screened negatively for symptoms, respectively. Conclusions: Many P-AYA survivors screening positively for anxiety or depression do not desire intervention. As well, screening would exclude between 36%-68% of those desiring intervention, representing a missed opportunity to potentially improve outcomes. Screening without assessing desire for intervention likely over identifies individuals who do not desire help while missing a relatively large number of those who do wish for assistance.


2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suryani Suryani ◽  
Efri Widianti ◽  
Taty Hernawati ◽  
Aat Sriati

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 386-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Guilding ◽  
Graham L. Bradley ◽  
Jessica Guilding

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the nature and extent of psychosocial need fulfillment experienced by resident strata title owners and to shed light on factors that detract from residents’ lived experience in the strata title context. Design/methodology/approach – An interview schedule that draws on theories of psychosocial need fulfillment was developed. In total, 16 home owners and three strata title managers were interviewed. Interviewees were sourced from three master planned communities located in South East Queensland, Australia. Findings – The majority of owners reported high levels of need fulfillment and neighbourhood satisfaction. Primary sources of dissatisfaction appeared to be related to body corporate committee governance issues. Research limitations/implications – The study's findings are subject to the widely acknowledged limitations of small sample based interview research and the study's qualitative orientation signifies that it suffers from the compromised generalisability and potential of selective and subjective reporting of observations. Practical implications – The findings suggest a need for greater societal appreciation of factors associated with living in a strata titled community. Recommendations are provided for facilitating the transition to strata title living and reducing sources of resident dissatisfaction. Originality/value – The paper uniquely explores residential satisfaction from a psychosocial needs perspective. There is a paucity of related research reported in the literature.


Intervention ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte M.L. Freeman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document