Does cardiac arrhythmia surgery improve a patient"s quality of life? a systematic review and meta-analysis

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Although one-year success of arrhythmia surgery for atrial fibrillation (AF) has long been defined as freedom from supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, patient-reported quality of life (QOL) has become increasingly important. Purpose We aimed to analyze current evidence of QOL following both concomitant and stand-alone arrhythmia surgery for AF. Methods Studies reporting on QOL of patients undergoing arrhythmia surgery for AF, stand-alone or concomitant, who provided essential data for the analysis, were included in this systematic review. A meta-analysis was performed on inter-study heterogeneity of changes in QOL in 9 of 12 included studies who used the Short-Form (SF) 36 tool. The metric standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to compare one year outcomes with baseline scores per variable of the SF-36 QOL questionnaire (total patients n = 545). Finally, meta-regression based on rhythm outcome after one year and add-on arrhythmia surgery as covariate were performed. Results QOL scores improved one year after surgical ablation for AF, evaluated by several questionnaires. In standalone arrhythmia procedures, meta-regression showed a significant improvement between the QOL and the procedural effectiveness after one year (Physical Functioning p = 0.015, Role Physical p = 0.006, General Health p = 0.002, Social Functioning p = 0.043. Forest plot Physical Functioning: SMD = 1.105; heterogeneity: I²=90.6%, p < 0.001). While this association was also suggested in concomitant procedures, only the variable Physical Role demonstrated a significant improvement when comparing QOL of cardiac surgery with and without add-on surgical AF ablation (p = 0.037). Conclusion Arrhythmia surgery for AF improves QOL. Both in standalone and concomitant procedures, the improvement in QOL seems to be related to the procedural effectiveness to maintain sinus rhythm after 12 months. Abstract Figure. SF-36 variable Physical Functioning

Outcomes of Atrial Arrhythmia Surgery in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review

Background The improved life expectancy of patients with congenital heart disease is often accompanied by the development of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Similarly, the number of patients requiring redo operations is expected to continue to rise as these patients are aging. Consequently, the role of arrhythmia surgery in the treatment of atrial arrhythmias is likely to become more important in this population. Although atrial arrhythmia surgery is a well‐established part of Fontan conversion procedures, evidence‐based recommendations for arrhythmia surgery for macroreentrant atrial tachycardia and atrial fibrillation in other patients with congenital heart disease are still lacking. Methods and Results Twenty‐eight studies were included in this systematic review. The median reported arrhythmia recurrence was 13% (interquartile range, 4%–26%) during follow‐up ranging from 3 months to 15.2 years. A large variation in surgical techniques was observed. Based on the acquired data, biatrial lesions are more effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation than exclusive right‐sided lesions. Right‐sided lesions may be more appropriate in the treatment of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia; evidence for the superiority of additional left‐sided lesions is lacking. There are not enough data to support the use of exclusive left‐sided lesions. Theoretically, prophylactic atrial arrhythmia surgery may be beneficial in this population, but evidence is currently limited. Conclusions To be able to provide recommendations for arrhythmia surgery in patients with congenital heart disease, future studies should report outcomes according to the type of preoperative arrhythmia, underlying congenital heart disease, lesion set, and energy source. This is essential for determining which surgical techniques should ideally be applied under which circumstances.