Design and Implementation of an Anti–Factor Xa Heparin Monitoring Protocol

Background: The VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System introduced a new nurse-driven anti–factor Xa (anti-Xa) protocol for monitoring unfractionated heparin to replace the previous activated partial thromboplastin time protocol. Objective: To design, implement, and evaluate the efficacy of the anti-Xa monitoring protocol. Methods: An interdisciplinary team of providers collaborated to develop and implement a nurse-driven, facility-wide anti–factor Xa protocol for monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy. The effectiveness of this protocol was evaluated by retrospective analysis. Results: We reviewed 100 medical records for compliance with the new anti-Xa monitoring protocol. We then evaluated 178 patients whose anticoagulation was monitored with the anti-Xa assay to determine the time to therapeutic range. We found that 80% of patients receiving the anti-Xa protocol achieved therapeutic anticoagulation within 24 hours, as compared with 54% of patients receiving the activated partial thromboplastin time protocol (P < .001). Protocol conversion also yielded a decrease in blood draws, dose adjustments, and potential calculation errors. Conclusions: Monitoring intravenous heparin therapy with the anti-Xa assay rather than activated partial thromboplastin time resulted in a shorter time to therapeutic anticoagulation, longer maintenance of therapeutic levels, and fewer laboratory tests and heparin dosage changes. We believe the current practice of monitoring heparin treatment with activated partial thromboplastin time assays should be reexamined.

Anticoagulation Monitoring Under ECMO Support: A Comparative Study Between the Activated Coagulation Time and the Anti-Xa Activity Assay

Purpose: Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is used in cases of severe respiratory and/or circulatory failure over periods of several days to several weeks. Its circuitry requires a closely monitored anticoagulation therapy that is empirically supported by activated clotting time (ACT)—a method often associated with large inter- and intraindividual variability. We aimed to compare the measurement of heparin activity with ACT and the direct measurement of the heparin activity (anti-Xa) in a large ECMO population. Methods: All patients treated by venoarterial or venovenous ECMO in our intensive care unit between January 2014 and December 2015 were prospectively included. A concomitant measurement of the anti-Xa activity and ACT was performed on the same sample collected twice a day (morning–evening) for unfractionated heparin adaptation with an ACT target range of 180 to 220 seconds. Results: One hundred and nine patients (men 69.7%, median age 54 years) treated with ECMO (70.6% venoarterial) were included. Spearman analysis found no correlation between anti-Xa and ACT (ρ < 0.4) from day 1 and worsened over time. Kappa analysis showed no agreement between the respective target ranges of ACT and anti-Xa. Conclusions: We demonstrate that concomitant measurement of ACT and anti-Xa activity is irrelevant in ECMO patients. Since ACT is poorly correlated with heparin dosage, anti-Xa activity appears to be a more suitable assay for anticoagulation monitoring.