The Habitual Tendencies Questionnaire: A Tool for Psychometric Individual Differences Research

Habits are automatic responses to learned stimuli or contextual cues that are insensitive to goals. While habits may allow for automated behaviours that increase efficiency in our daily lives, an over-reliance on habits has been suggested to contribute to disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). There are currently few established measures of individual differences in habitual tendencies. To fill this gap, the present study generated and validated a novel 11-item scale, the Habitual Tendencies Questionnaire (HTQ), to measure individual differences in habitual tendencies in the general population. In Study 1, factor analysis revealed three underlying subcomponents of the HTQ: Compulsivity, Preference for Regularity, and Aversion to Novelty, with Compulsivity showing the strongest association with subclinical OCD symptomatology. Study 2 validated the HTQ and replicated the findings of Study 1 in a larger sample, and explored relationships with other personality traits. The results emphasize the importance of measuring individual variation in habitual thinking styles, illustrating that different facets of habitual tendencies may contribute to diverse behavioural and clinical outcomes. The present investigation provides a new, reliable way of measuring habitual tendencies and has important implications for future explorations into the nature of individual differences from a dimensional perspective to psychiatry.

The Role of Perceived Control in the Psychophysiological Responses to Disgust of Subclinical OCD Women

Obsessive‒compulsive disorder (OCD), and especially contamination obsessions and washing compulsions, has been related to disgust. However, when its cardiovascular correlates have been studied, contradictory results have been found, including heart rate accelerations and decelerations. The aim of this study is to analyze emotional, cognitive, and cardiovascular responses in nonclinical (control) and subclinical participants with obsessive‒compulsive contamination/washing symptoms when confronted with a disgusting stimulus. Twenty-seven participants (14 subclinical OCD) completed a behavioral avoidance task with a contamination-based stimulus while their heart rate and subjective variables were measured. Results showed heart rate reductions in both samples, whereas subjective measures reflected higher disgust, anxiety, dirtiness, and emotional valence in the subclinical sample. However, at the same time, the sense of dominance was lower in the control group. In conclusion, our results support a heart rate deceleration during exposure to a disgusting stimulus dissociated from the subjective experience.

Evidence of Impaired Event-Based Prospective Memory in Clinical Obsessive–Compulsive Checking

Based on findings from subclinical OCD checking samples (Cuttler & Graf, 2007; 2008), Cuttler and Graf (2009) suggested that checking may develop to compensate for prospective memory failures. The present study provides the first evidence of prospective memory problems in a clinical sample of OCD checkers (n = 26) compared to a group of healthy controls (n = 26). Consistent with earlier work with subclinical samples, the OCD checkers performed more poorly on an event-based, but not a time-based, prospective memory task. However, the OCD checkers did not report more subjective prospective memory failures than controls and their confidence in prospective memory accuracy was higher than that of controls. An explanation of the inconsistent findings with regard to metamemory in clinical and subclinical OCD checking is provided. Further research assessing both subjective memory performance and the strategies understood to support memory is needed to clarify the contribution of prospective memory to OCD checking.

Subclinical Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Children and Adolescents: Additional Results From a “High-Risk” Study

Introduction: The concept of subclinical obsessive-compulsive disorder is explored using data from a “high-risk” study of offspring of persons with (OCD) and offspring of controls. Offspring with OCD were compared to those with subclinical OCD, and those without either condition. Subclinical OCD is defined as the presence of obsessions and/or compulsions without functional impairment.Methods: Adults with OCD and their offspring 7–18 years of age were recruited through a tertiary care center psychiatric outpatient clinic, while controls (and their children) were recruited via advertisement. Parents and offspring were assessed using structured interviews and validated questionnaires at baseline and follow-up interviews.Results: Offspring from both proband groups were pooled to create three subject groups: group 1, offspring with neither condition (n=43); group 2, offspring with subclinical OCD (n=24); and group 3, offspring with full OCD (n=11). Offspring with subclinical OCD held the middle ground for most comparisons. They were more symptomatic than offspring without either condition (group 1), but less symptomatic than subjects with OCD (group 3). Across the board, comparisons of diagnoses, Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) results; Motor tic, Obsessions and compulsions, Vocal tic Evaluation Survey results; and Leyton Obsessional Inventory (LOI) results were associated with subject group at baseline and follow-up. In post-hoc comparisons, subjects with subclinical OCD had fewer comorbid anxiety disorders and lower CBCL internalizing scale scores at follow-up. Parents of children with OCD had higher LOI symptom and severity scores than parents in those of groups 1 or 2.Conclusion: The findings suggest that subclinical OCD holds the middle ground between full-blown OCD and having neither condition in terms of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and severity, tics, associated mood/anxiety disorders, and general functioning. At least in persons at risk for OCD, the presence of subclinical OCD may herald the onset of OCD, though in others may be an independent condition that does not lead to full OCD.