Blast Exposure Causes Long-Term Degeneration of Neuronal Cytoskeletal Elements in the Cochlear Nucleus: A Potential Mechanism for Chronic Auditory Dysfunctions

Blast-induced auditory dysfunctions including tinnitus are the most prevalent disabilities in service members returning from recent combat operations. Most of the previous studies were focused on the effect of blast exposure on the peripheral auditory system and not much on the central auditory signal-processing regions in the brain. In the current study, we have exposed rats to single and tightly coupled repeated blasts and examined the degeneration of neuronal cytoskeletal elements using silver staining in the central auditory signal-processing regions in the brain at 24 h, 14 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year. The brain regions evaluated include cochlear nucleus, lateral lemniscus, inferior colliculus, medial geniculate nucleus, and auditory cortex. The results obtained indicated that a significant increase in degeneration of neuronal cytoskeletal elements was observed only in the left and right cochlear nucleus. A significant increase in degeneration of neuronal cytoskeletal elements was observed in the cochlear nucleus at 24 h and persisted through 1 year, suggesting acute and chronic neuronal degeneration after blast exposure. No statistically significant differences were observed between single and repeated blasts. The localized degeneration of neuronal cytoskeletal elements in the cochlear nucleus suggests that the damage could be caused by transmission of blast shockwaves/noise through the ear canal and that use of suitable ear protection devices can protect against acute and chronic central auditory signal processing defects including tinnitus after blast exposure.

Cortical Tracking of Speech: Toward Collaboration between the Fields of Signal and Sentence Processing

In recent years, a growing number of studies have used cortical tracking methods to investigate auditory language processing. Although most studies that employ cortical tracking stem from the field of auditory signal processing, this approach should also be of interest to psycholinguistics—particularly the subfield of sentence processing—given its potential to provide insight into dynamic language comprehension processes. However, there has been limited collaboration between these fields, which we suggest is partly because of differences in theoretical background and methodological constraints, some mutually exclusive. In this paper, we first review the theories and methodological constraints that have historically been prioritized in each field and provide concrete examples of how some of these constraints may be reconciled. We then elaborate on how further collaboration between the two fields could be mutually beneficial. Specifically, we argue that the use of cortical tracking methods may help resolve long-standing debates in the field of sentence processing that commonly used behavioral and neural measures (e.g., ERPs) have failed to adjudicate. Similarly, signal processing researchers who use cortical tracking may be able to reduce noise in the neural data and broaden the impact of their results by controlling for linguistic features of their stimuli and by using simple comprehension tasks. Overall, we argue that a balance between the methodological constraints of the two fields will lead to an overall improved understanding of language processing as well as greater clarity on what mechanisms cortical tracking of speech reflects. Increased collaboration will help resolve debates in both fields and will lead to new and exciting avenues for research.