Optimal Revascularization Strategy for Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: The relative benefit of immediate complete revascularization, staged complete revascularization, and culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear in hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of the 3 PCI strategies in this population.Methods: We followed a pre-specified protocol (PROSPERO number: CRD42020183801). A comprehensive search of the electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library from inception through February 21, 2020 was conducted. Randomized trials evaluating the comparative efficacy and safety of at least 2 of the 3 PCI strategies were identified. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular mortality or myocardial infarction (MI) during the longest follow-up. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed with random-effects model.Results: Eleven trials including 6,942 patients were analyzed. Pairwise meta-analysis noted that immediate complete revascularization and staged complete revascularization were respectively associated with a 52 and 27% reduction in the risk of cardiovascular death or MI (relative risk [RR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–0.73, I2 = 0%; and RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61–0.88, I2 = 0%, respectively), compared with culprit-only PCI. The risk of cardiovascular death or MI was not statistically different in staged and immediate complete revascularization groups (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.45–1.72, I2 = 0%). Network meta-analysis obtained almost similar results compared with pairwise meta-analysis, and immediate complete revascularization had a 77% probability of being the best strategy for reducing cardiovascular death or MI among the 3 PCI strategies.Conclusion: The current evidence suggests that both immediate and staged complete revascularization were associated with a reduction of cardiovascular death or MI compared with culprit-only PCI. Further trials are warranted to directly compare immediate vs. staged complete revascularization in this population.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, PROSPERO [CRD42020183801].

Multifocal atherosclerosis: focus on the prevention of ischemic events

In patients with atherosclerotic lesions of two or more systems or multifocal atherosclerosis (MFA), the risks of ischemic events are extremely high. MFA leads not only to cardiovascular outcomes, but also to a decrease in the patient’s quality of life, life expectancy, and in most cases to disability. The prevalence of this pathology and the importance of preventing adverse outcomes are often underestimated. This literature review examines the problem of MFA in the context of key studies on the prevalence, course of multivessel disease and the reduction of the risk of cardiovascular events in this group of patients, with an emphasis on antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy.

Case Report: Key Role of the Impella Device to Achieve Complete Revascularization in a Patient With Complex Multivessel Disease and Severely Depressed Left Ventricular Function

Background: Left ventricle (LV) assist devices may be required to stabilize hemodynamic status during complex, high-risk, and indicated procedures (CHIP). We present a case in which elective hemodynamic support with the Impella CP device was essential to achieve complete revascularization with PCI in a patient with complex multivessel disease and severely depressed LV function.Case Summary: A 45-year-old male with no previous history of cardiovascular disease presented to the emergency department for new onset exertional dyspnoea. Echocardiography showed severely depressed LV function (EF 27%) that was confirmed with cardiac magnetic resonance. Two chronic total occlusions (CTOs) of the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) and left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) were found at coronary angiography. After Heart Team evaluation, PCI with Impella hemodynamic support was planned. After crossing and predilating the CTO of the LCx, ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred. No direct current (DC) shock was performed because the patient was conscious thanks to the support provided by the Impella pump. About 1 min later, spontaneous termination of VF occurred. Afterwards, the two CTOs were successfully treated with good result and no complications. Recovery of LV function was observed at discharge. At 9 months, the patient had no symptoms and echocardiography showed an EF of 60%.Discussion: In this complex high-risk patient, hemodynamic support was essential to allow successful PCI. It is remarkable that the patient remained conscious and hemodynamically stable during VF that spontaneously terminated after 1 min, likely because the Impella pump provided preserved coronary perfusion and LV unloading. This case confirms the pivotal role of Impella in supporting CHIP, particularly in patients with multivessel disease and depressed LV function.

806 Scout post-PCI instantaneous wave-free ratio as a driver of functional complete

Aims Physiology assessment by means of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is non-inferior to fractional flow reserve for the assessment of intermediate coronary lesions that are candidates to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, in pivotal trials assessing iFR, tandem coronary lesions (i.e. two serial lesions located in the same coronary artery) were excluded. In addition, the role of iFR after PCI as a way to optimize its success is poorly understood, particularly in the context of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel disease and tandem stenoses. We describe an illustrative case of post-PCI iFR in a STEMI patient with multivessel disease that led to a significant change in the revascularization strategy. Methods A 71-year old man presented with infero-lateral STEMI and received PCI with 1 drug-eluting stent (DES) 2.25 × 18 mm on the distal right coronary artery. The left coronary artery presented a 30–40% stenosis of the proximal left circumflex (LCX) and a 90% bifurcation stenosis of the mid portion of the same artery. PCI of the distal lesion was performed with implantation of 1 DES 3.0 × 22 with flaring of the stent at the level of the side branch and proximal optimization technique. Post-PCI iFR of the LCX was performed to assess the success of the procedure, with a value of 0.74. To understand the relative contribution of the two tandem stenoses, a pullback of the iFR wire was performed, which showed an unexpectedly small jump of the pressure when the wire was between the two lesions (0.80). Results As such, the significant contribution of the proximal lesion was unravelled, which led to implantation of a second DES 4.0 × 26 mm, partially overlapping with the previously implanted DES. Post-PCI iFR confirmed the complete success of the procedure (1.00). Conclusions In the context of complete revascularization for STEMI presenting with non-infarct related artery tandem stenoses, post-PCI physiology contributes to unravel the relative contribution of low-grade angiographic stenoses corresponding to functionally significant atherosclerosis left untreated. This case example illustrates the emerging procedural value of post-PCI iFR in achieving the goal of complete functional revascularization.

86 STEMI and multivessel disease: medical therapy amplifies the benefit of complete myocardial revascularization

Aims Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel disease (MVD) may be treated with different revascularization strategies. However, the potential predictors of outcomes on top of different revascularization strategies are poorly studied. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of two different revascularization strategies and the potential impact of medical therapy. Methods and results Using a propensity score approach, the impact of two treatment strategies was analysed—staged non-culprit revascularization group vs. culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group—on a composite outcome of cardiovascular death (CVD), myocardial infarction, and repeated revascularization. Moreover, models were further adjusted for medication at discharge. Among 1385 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI, a subgroup of 433 with MVD was analysed. At the median follow-up of 41 (IQR, 21–65) months, after propensity-score adjustment, the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that the staged non-culprit revascularization group was associated with a lower composite endpoint (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24–0.82; P = 0.01), lower CVD (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.14–0.82; P = 0.02), and lower all-cause death (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24–0.86; P = 0.02). Use of renin–angiotensin inhibitors was associated with lower CVD (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27–0.95; P = 0.03), and both renin–angiotensin inhibitors (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32–0.86; P = 0.01) and beta blockers (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29–0.79; P = 0.01) were associated with lower all-cause death. Conclusions In a real-word STEMI population with multivessel disease, staged non-culprit revascularization was associated with lower cardiovascular mortality compared with a culprit-only PCI strategy. However, both revascularization and medical therapy played a role in the improvement of mortality outcomes. Medical therapy amplified the benefit of myocardial revascularization.