Corrigendum: Local and global structure of connections on nonarchimedean curves

We correct some statements and proofs of K. S. Kedlaya [Local and global structure of connections on nonarchimedean curves, Compos. Math. 151 (2015), 1096–1156]. To summarize, Proposition 1.1.2 is false as written, and we provide here a corrected statement and proof (and a corresponding modification of Remark 1.1.3); the proofs of Theorem 2.3.17 and Theorem 3.8.16, which rely on Proposition 1.1.2, are corrected accordingly; some missing details in the proofs of Theorem 3.4.20 and Theorem 3.4.22 are filled in; and a few much more minor corrections are recorded.

Corrigendum

Patel T, Slonim K, Lee L. Use of potentially inappropriate medications among ambulatory home-dwelling elderly patients with dementia: a review of the literature. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2017;150:169-83. (Original doi: 10.1177/1715163517701770) In the Funding section on page 182 of this article in the May/June 2017 issue of Canadian Pharmacists Journal, a funder for the work was omitted. The Ontario Pharmacy Evidence Network (OPEN) should have been included. The corrected statement is provided below: Funding: This review was conducted in response to an applied health research question submitted by Alzheimer Society Ontario to the Innovations Strengthening Primary Healthcare through Research (INSPIRE–PHC) Program and the Ontario Pharmacy Evidence Network (OPEN) supported by grants from the Government of Ontario (INSPIRE-PHC - Ministry grant 06547 and OPEN- Ministry grant 06674). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Government of Ontario.

CORRIGENDUM AND ADDENDUM: "On random topological Markov chains with big images and preimages"

We give a corrected statement and extended proof of Theorem 4.1 in [2] and an alternative proof of Corollary 4.1 which is independent of the wrong statement in the theorem.

Response Elicitation in English-medium Christian Pulpit Discourse (ECPD)

The study is an investigation into the various ways pulpit preachers in Christian religion elicit responses from their congregation. The data for the study consists of messages delivered from the pulpit at denominational, non-denominational and interdenominational Christian services in South-Western Nigeria. Working within the framework of Sociolinguistics and Discourse Analysis, the analyses reveal that preachers control the discourse, while the worshippers share in the process of creation of the text as it unfolds. For instance, they determine what responses are given, how they should be given and when to give them. It was also observed that response elicitation is done through the use of interrogatives, declaratives and imperatives, and such responses may come in forms of speech, physical action, and mental behaviour. Our analyses reveal a preponderance of spoken responses in the data. Five kinds of spoken responses are identified in the data, namely: Conventional Answer (CA), Response to Prayers (RP), Repeated Statements (RS), Gap Filling (GF), and Corrected Statement (CS). The study concludes that despite that the way responses are elicited depends largely on the practices of any religious community, certain patterns of elicitation are common in ECPD. The degree of control and the kind of response elicited by a preacher are determined by the language expectations of the community. Such expectations include knowledge of the language code, principles, norms, use, situation and the world of such religious communities.