ejecta blanket
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

28
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Costanza Morino ◽  
Susan Conway ◽  
Coralie Peignaux ◽  
Antoine Lucas ◽  
Kristian Svennevig ◽  
...  

<p>The 125-km-diameter Hale impact crater is located in the southern hemisphere of Mars and has been dated to 1 Ga (Early to Middle Amazonian; Jones et al., 2011). It is thought to have penetrated the martian cryosphere, because it hosts landforms indicating volatile mobilisation post-impact: its ejecta are lobate and bear channels, and the interior is pervasively pitted and hosts alluvial fans (Collins-May et al. 2020; El-Maarry et al., 2013; Jones et al., 2011; Tornabene et al., 2012). Here, we test the hypothesis that conical mounds found within the ejecta are “molards” by comparing them to terrestrial analogues. Molards are conical mounds of debris resulting from the degradation of blocks of ice-rich material which have been mobilised by a landslide and are found in periglacial environments (Morino et al., 2019).</p><p>Our study area (240x180 km) is in the South-East part of the Hale impact crater ejecta (36°–39°S, 36°–31°W). We analyse the spatial and topographic distribution of the conical mounds using orbital images from 25 cm/pixel to 15 m/pixel and measure their height, width and slope using 1 m/pixel elevation data. We then compare them to conical mounds on the deposits of the 2010 Mount Meager debris avalanche, Canada (Roberti et al. 2017) and of the 2000 Paatuut landslide in western Greenland (Dahl-Jensen et al. 2004).</p><p>The conical mounds of the Hale impact crater are located at the distal boundary of the thickest part of the ejecta blanket, which reflects the spatial distribution of mounds along the distal parts of the terminal lobe of the Mount Meager debris avalanche. Furthermore, mounds in the Hale impact crater have comparable shapes and flank slopes to molards in the Mount Meager and Paatuut case studies, but are one order of magnitude bigger. This size difference is consistent with the flow-depth that transported the blocks also being one order of magnitude bigger than on Earth.</p><p>We infer that conical mounds near the Hale impact crater are a result of fragmented blocks of ice-cemented regolith produced by the impact and transported by the ejecta flows, and finally degraded into cones of debris (molards) by the loss of interstitial ice. Our interpretation supports the prevailing hypothesis that the Hale impact event penetrated the martian cryosphere and further provides important constraints on the rheology of martian ejecta deposits that can be tested by future studies and in other locations on Mars.</p><p>We acknowledge financial support for the PERMOLARDS project from French National Research Agency (ANR-19-CE01-0010).</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 178 (1) ◽  
pp. jgs2020-056
Author(s):  
G. R. Osinski ◽  
L. Ferrière ◽  
P. J. A. Hill ◽  
A. R. Prave ◽  
L. J. Preston ◽  
...  

The origin of the Stac Fada Member has been debated for decades with several early hypotheses being proposed, but all invoking some connection to volcanic activity. In 2008, the discovery of shocked quartz led to the hypothesis that the Stac Fada Member represents part the continuous ejecta blanket of a meteorite impact crater, the location of which was, and remains, unknown. In this paper, we confirm the presence of shock-metamorphosed and -melted material in the Stac Fada Member; however, we also show that its properties are unlike any other confirmed and well documented proximal impact ejecta deposits on Earth. Instead, the properties of the Stac Fada Member are most similar to the Onaping Formation of the Sudbury impact structure (Canada) and impact melt-bearing breccias from the Chicxulub impact structure (Mexico). We thus propose that, like the Sudbury and Chicxulub deposits, Melt Fuel Coolant Interactions – akin to what occur during phreatomagmatic volcanic eruptions – played a fundamental role in the origin of the Stac Fada Member. We conclude that these rocks are not primary impact ejecta but instead were deposited beyond the extent of the continuous ejecta blanket as high-energy ground-hugging sediment gravity flows.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 200236
Author(s):  
K. H. Joy ◽  
J. F. Snape ◽  
A. A. Nemchin ◽  
R. Tartèse ◽  
D. M. Martin ◽  
...  

Apollo 16 soil-like regolith breccia 65745,7 contains two zircon-bearing clasts. One of these clasts is a thermally annealed silica-rich rock, which mineralogically has affinities with the High Alkali Suite (Clast 1), and yields zircon dates ranging from 4.08 to 3.38 Ga. The other clast is a KREEP-rich impact melt breccia (Clast 2) and yields zircon dates ranging from 3.97 to 3.91 Ga. The crystalline cores of both grains, which yield dates of ca 3.9 Ga, have undergone shock pressure modification at less than 20 GPa. We interpret that the U-Pb chronometer in these zircon grains has been partially reset by the Imbrium basin-forming event when the clasts were incorporated into the Cayley Plains ejecta blanket deposit. The zircon grains in Clast 1 have been partially decomposed, resulting in a breakdown polymineralic texture, with elevated U, Pb and Th abundances compared with those in the crystalline zircon. These decomposed areas exhibit younger dates around 3.4 Ga, suggesting a secondary high-pressure, high-temperature event, probably caused by an impact in the local Apollo 16 highlands area.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Lagain ◽  
Misha Kreslavsky ◽  
Gretchen Benedix ◽  
David Baratoux ◽  
Phil Bland ◽  
...  

<p>Knowledge of collision rates through time and space is essential because meteoritic impact crater counting is the only way to determine the ages of surface geological units and processes on the solid bodies of our Solar System. All chronology models assume a constant size distribution of impactors and an exponential decay of the impact flux between 4 Ga and 2.5 Ga before the present followed by a constant rate over the last 2.5 Ga. These two assumptions are challenged by recent evidence for an increase of the impact flux on the Moon and the Earth and probably on Mars associated with a decoupling between the flux of small and large impactors over the last billion years. Here, using the results of an automatic crater detection algorithm, we investigate the evolution of the rate of formation of large impact craters (Dc ≥ 20km) on Mars and thus infer the evolution of the flux of large impactors (Di > 5km) from the size-frequency distribution of small craters superposed to the ejecta blankets of large ones.</p><p>The dating of large impact craters on Mars is limited by several factors such as the degradation of ejecta blankets and the retention rate of small craters superposed to their ejecta. We therefore focused on craters ≥20km in diameter exhibiting an ejecta blanket according to the crater database and located on a latitudinal band between ±35°. We then selected those whom their ejecta are not affected by volcanic/tectonic processes or by the formation of another large nearby impact crater. The final set includes 590 impact craters.</p><p>If one can argue the impact flux cannot be fully recorded for the last 4Ga due to resurfacing processes erasing progressively the ejecta blanket and large craters themselves, Hesperian and Noachian terrains within the 35° latitudinal band should nevertheless have retained all D≥20km craters over a portion of the Amazonian period. The CSFD of craters younger than 600Ma (113 craters) superposed to these terrains is consistent with the 600Ma isochron, supporting the fact that the entire population of craters ≥20km formed over the last 600 million years on this portion of the Martian surface has been counted completely. We therefore focused on the analysis of the impact rate evolution over this range of time from this crater sub-sample.</p><p>The formation of large impact craters is not homogeneously distributed over the time range investigated here. Our data suggest an inconsistency between the flux used to date each crater and the rate inferred from these datings, thus implying that the small and large body impact fluxes are decoupled from one another. We note also sharp peaks centered around 480, 280 and 100Ma. Preliminary statistical test show that 280Ma peak is marginally significant whereas the two others are too small to be statistically significant. This pattern would be consistent with other independent arguments for increased rate with similar intensity and timing on the Moon and Mars for which the causes are probably collisions and potentially formation of asteroid families within the main asteroid belt.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 1346-1353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry Sieh ◽  
Jason Herrin ◽  
Brian Jicha ◽  
Dayana Schonwalder Angel ◽  
James D. P. Moore ◽  
...  

The crater and proximal effects of the largest known young meteorite impact on Earth have eluded discovery for nearly a century. We present 4 lines of evidence that the 0.79-Ma impact crater of the Australasian tektites lies buried beneath lavas of a long-lived, 910-km3 volcanic field in Southern Laos: 1) Tektite geochemistry implies the presence of young, weathered basalts at the site at the time of the impact. 2) Geologic mapping and 40Ar-39Ar dates confirm that both pre- and postimpact basaltic lavas exist at the proposed impact site and that postimpact basalts wholly cover it. 3) A gravity anomaly there may also reflect the presence of a buried ∼17 × 13-km crater. 4) The nature of an outcrop of thick, crudely layered, bouldery sandstone and mudstone breccia 10–20 km from the center of the impact and fractured quartz grains within its boulder clasts support its being part of the proximal ejecta blanket.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document