misspecification tests
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

29
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Mahaboob ◽  
S. Vijay Prasad ◽  
J. Peter Praveen ◽  
Ranadheer Donthi ◽  
B. Venkateswarlu

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judea Pearl

Haavelmo was the first to recognize the capacity of economic models to guide policies. This paper describes some of the barriers that Haavelmo’s ideas have had (and still have) to overcome and lays out a logical framework that has evolved from Haavelmo’s insight and matured into a coherent and comprehensive account of the relationships between theory, data, and policy questions. The mathematical tools that emerge from this framework now enable investigators to answer complex policy and counterfactual questions using simple routines, some by mere inspection of the model’s structure. Several such problems are illustrated by examples, including misspecification tests, nonparametric identification, mediation analysis, and introspection. Finally, we observe that economists are largely unaware of the benefits that Haavelmo’s ideas bestow upon them and, to close this gap, we identify concrete recent advances in causal analysis that economists can utilize in research and education.


2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 358-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena Kalliovirta

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-62
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Caporin ◽  
Francesco Lisi

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 364-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreea G. Halunga ◽  
Chris D. Orme

This paper develops a framework for the construction and analysis of parametric misspecification tests for generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (GARCH) models, based on first-order asymptotic theory. The principal finding is that estimation effects from the correct specification of the conditional mean (regression) function can be asymptotically nonnegligible. This implies that certain procedures, such as the asymmetry tests of Engle and Ng (1993, Journal of Finance 48, 1749–1777) and the nonlinearity test of Lundbergh and Teräsvirta (2002, Journal of Econometrics 110, 417–435), are asymptotically invalid. A second contribution is the proposed use of alternative tests for asymmetry and/or nonlinearity that, it is conjectured, should enjoy improved power properties. A Monte Carlo study supports the principal theoretical findings and also suggests that the new tests have fairly good size and very good power properties when compared with the Engle and Ng (1993) and Lundbergh and Teräsvirta (2002) procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document