Law in Disorder

A formal request by the theorists produces a stand-alone Solid-State Theory Group at Bell Labs. A summer visitor program leads several visiting theorists to conclude that localization occurred in Feher’s samples due to an electrostatic mechanism suggested by Nevill Mott. Anderson develops a theory for localization where the disorder in the positions of the dopants plays a crucial role. Mott champions Anderson’s theory and the Nobel Committee cites it when Anderson wins a share of the 1977 Nobel Prize with Mott and John Van Vleck. David Thouless re-ignites Anderson’s interest in localization and he leads the Gang of Four to develop a novel scaling theory of localization.

Abstract NS17: One Hospital's Experience in Establishing a Stroke Peer Visitor Program

Background and Purpose: Literature suggests that despite being overwhelmed during the acute phase of stroke, patients and families want and are accepting of the support a peer visitor can provide. While patients undergoing acute rehabilitation services in our organization were exposed to a stroke peer visitor network, there was no equivalent peer program for in-patient stroke survivors. Therefore, the purpose was to design, develop and implement a stroke peer visitor program for hospital in-patients. Methods: Using the ShareGivers ™ Peer Visiting program resources as a guide, an in-patient stroke peer visiting program was designed and implemented. Recruitment and training of stroke survivor peer mentors was followed by individualized on-site orientation and program implementation. Evaluations of the program were ongoing. Results: Through 23 weeks of program implementation, six stroke peer visitors contributed 111 hours making 61 patient visits. Stroke peer visitors contributed an average of 5 hours per week. Stroke in-patients welcomed the visits from the peer visitors. Feedback was positive from nursing staff, patients/families and the peer visitors. Common responses were, “I love it when the stroke volunteers are here”, “so helpful to hear from someone who’s been there”, “the patient/family had so many questions”, “had a great visit”. Conclusions: Participant feedback suggests peer visits in the acute phase of stroke recovery are important, beneficial and inspirational. Desire for growth of the program is reflected in requests for annual orientation, adding more peer volunteers, partnering new with experienced volunteers during training and introducing area hospitals to a central peer visiting training concept. Implication for future nursing research includes quantifying the benefits of peer visitation for stroke survivors and their families while in the acute phase of stroke recovery.