LINGUISTIC CLASSIFICATION OF ANTHROPONYMS AND TOPONYMS IN BOBURNOMA

Таржима илми ва амалиётида ўгириш қийин бўлган сўзлар бир талай. Уларнинг асосийлари миллий ўзига хос сўзлар бўлиб, халқаро терминда реалиялар дейилади. Бу муаммоларнинг ечими, уларнинг таснифи ва тавсифи таржима назариясида ўрганилмоқда. Умумий қонун-қоидалар билан бирга ҳар бир тил жуфтлигида махсус қоидалар ишлаб чиқилмоғи лозим. Чет тиллардан ўзбек тилига ўгирилаётган асарларда ана шу муаммолар ҳанузгача таржимонлар ва муҳаррирларнинг бошини қотириб келмоқда. Ушбу мақолада асосан бошқа тиллардаги атоқли отлар тоифасига кирувчи киши номлари таржимаси ва ўзбек тилида ёзилиши ҳақида фикр юритамиз.

Investigating of extralinguistic and linguistic classification of terminological system in geology(on the materials of English and Uzbek terms in the sphere of geology)

The article analyzes the peculiarities of terminological system in the sphere of geology. In particular, features related to factors such as extralinguistic and linguistic as the main aspects ofterminological area. The article studies the classification of terms taking an account of these two factors to disclose the pivotal components of terminological system in geology.

Variability in inflectional forms of attributive-appositive composite lexical units in Polish

This paper examines inflectional markers (signalling number, case and gender) of selected types of NN complexes in Polish, which can be regarded as attributive-appositive (ATAP) lexical units in the cross-linguistic classification of compounds proposed by Scalise & Bisetto (2009) . Polish compounds proper show externalization of inflection and take inflectional markers on their right-hand constituents only. In contrast, Polish juxtapositions are expected to display double inflectional marking (on both their components). However, data from the National Corpus of Polish demonstrate that ATAP juxtapositions containing the lexeme widmo ‘ghost, phantom’ as their right-hand component exhibit variability in their inflectional paradigms. The right-hand (i.e. the modifier) constituent of such juxtapositions either shows number and case agreement with the head noun, or it appears in the default (nom.sg) form. Potential reasons for the instability of inflectional paradigms of such NN juxtapositions are considered.

Demystifying ontological classification in language engineering

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. The introduction of ontological classification to support domain-metamodeling has been pivotal in the emergence of multi-level modeling as a dynamic research area. However, existing expositions of ontological classification have only used a limited context to distinguish it from the historically more commonly used linguistic classification. In important areas such as domain-specific languages and classic language engineering the distinction can appear to become blurred and the role of ontological classification is obscured, if not fundamentally challenged. In this paper we therefore examine critical points of confusion regarding the distinction and provide an expanded explanation of the differences. We maintain that optimally utilizing ontological classification, even for tasks that traditionally have only been viewed as language engineering, is critical for mastering the challenges in complex systems modeling including the validation of multi-language models.

Demystifying ontological classification in language engineering

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. The introduction of ontological classification to support domain-metamodeling has been pivotal in the emergence of multi-level modeling as a dynamic research area. However, existing expositions of ontological classification have only used a limited context to distinguish it from the historically more commonly used linguistic classification. In important areas such as domain-specific languages and classic language engineering the distinction can appear to become blurred and the role of ontological classification is obscured, if not fundamentally challenged. In this paper we therefore examine critical points of confusion regarding the distinction and provide an expanded explanation of the differences. We maintain that optimally utilizing ontological classification, even for tasks that traditionally have only been viewed as language engineering, is critical for mastering the challenges in complex systems modeling including the validation of multi-language models.

Turkic Typologies: Ideology and Indigenous Linguistic Knowledge in the Work of Bekir Çobanzade

The current work is an exploration of the life and linguistic scholarship of the Crimean Tatar linguist Bekir Çobanzade. In it, I pay particular attention to the impact of the author's socio-political environment, especially the rise of Stalinism, on his works relating to the history and classification of the Turkic languages. I demonstrate how these circumstances compelled Çobanzade to perform an intellectual migration, from an indigenous Turkic ontology focused on the structural wholeness of the Turkic languages to a rigid application of Marxist-Leninist concepts of socially-determined linguistic classification. I do this with the help of monographs and journal articles published in Crimean Tatar, Ottoman Turkish, Azerbaijani and Russian, problematizing the multitude of his audiences and loyalties. As such, Çobanzade's story becomes a microcosm of the experience of a broader generation of Turkic writers and scholars. It was a generation that sought to take the greatest benefit from the monumental changes following World War I, and ended up being consumed by the totalitarian state that emerged in its wake. Çobanzade is one victim of many whose scholarly oeuvre can open a window to a heady and bygone period of experimentation and change.

Binā’ al Nazhariyah al Lughawiyyah fî al Turast al ‘Arabiy wa Taqwîmuhā

Indeed humans live in a specific environment and receive the language of this environment by acquiring it with a certainty of its vocal, grammatical, and semantic, as well as with knowledge of social rules in understanding and producing speech. Although linguists agree on this fact in language acquisition, they differ in their views on the acquisition process. Every opinion is based on a theory towards the nature of language. This research aims to explain and evaluate the linguistic theory in Arabic heritage. The researcher reads deeply the references, After a comprehensive understanding is formed on the object of the research, the researcher analyzes and realizes this information. The results of this research indicate that the Arabic heritage took place in the various theories presented by Arab linguists, namely “analysis” and “classification”. The various assumptions and theories used by the Arab linguistic heritage to classify the language and to describe it can be combined in an interference group of circles representing the general structure of the linguistic classification theory, as the various assumptions define and visualize their location from each other. So, the Arabic lesson needs to be reviewed and described as taxonomic rather than a standard lesson. Keywords: Linguistic theory, Arabic Heritage, Evaluation.