intrafirm trade
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

34
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 109180
Author(s):  
Chrysovalantou Milliou

2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim J. Ruhl

Using two independent data sources—the intrafirm trade data from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis and the related party trade data from the US Census Bureau—I construct and compare measures of US intrafirm exports and imports. I find that, in general, the two datasets provide similar measures of US intrafirm trade, particularly for exports. Understanding the differences that do exist in measurement will likely require study of the confidential micro data at both the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Census Bureau.


2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 913-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bradford Jensen ◽  
Dennis P. Quinn ◽  
Stephen Weymouth

AbstractWe apply insights from “new, new” trade theory to explain a puzzling decline in US firm antidumping (AD) filings in an era of persistent foreign currency undervaluations and increasing import competition. Firms exhibit heterogeneity both within and across industries regarding foreign direct investment (FDI). We propose that firms making vertical or resource-seeking investments abroad will be less likely to file AD petitions, and firms are likely to undertake vertical FDI in the context of currency undervaluation. Hence, we argue, the increasing vertical FDI of US firms makes trade disputes far less likely. We use firm-level data to examine the universe of US manufacturing firms and find that AD filers generally conduct no intrafirm trade with filed-against countries. We also find that persistent currency undervaluation is associated over time with increased vertical FDI and intrafirm trade by US multinational corporations (MNCs) in the undervaluing country. Among larger US MNCs, the likelihood of an AD filing is negatively associated with increases in intrafirm trade. In the context of currency undervaluation, we confirm the existing finding that undervaluation is associated with more AD filings. We also find, however, that high levels of intrafirm imports from countries with undervalued currencies significantly decrease the likelihood of AD filings. Our study highlights the centrality of firm heterogeneity in international trade and investment in understanding political mobilization over international economic policy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 244-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Debaere ◽  
Hongshik Lee ◽  
Joonhyung Lee
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 825-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Corcos ◽  
Delphine M. Irac ◽  
Giordano Mion ◽  
Thierry Verdier
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefania Garetto

I propose a general equilibrium framework where firms decide whether to outsource or integrate input manufacturing, domestically or abroad. By outsourcing, firms may benefit from suppliers' technologies, but pay mark-up prices. By sourcing intrafirm, they save on mark-ups and pay possibly lower foreign wages. Multinational corporations arise when firms integrate production abroad. The model predicts that intrafirm imports are positively correlated with the mean and variance of the firms' productivity distribution and with the degree of input differentiation. I use the model to quantify the US welfare gains from intrafirm trade, which amount to about 0.23 percent of consumption per-capita. (JEL D21, F12, F23, F41, L11, L24)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document