Comparative Analysis of Pharmacodynamics in the C3HeB/FeJ Mouse Tuberculosis Model for DprE1 inhibitors TBA-7371, PBTZ169 and OPC-167832

Multiple drug discovery initiatives for tuberculosis are currently ongoing to identify and develop new potent drugs with novel targets in order to shorten treatment duration. One of the drug classes with a new mode of action are DprE1 inhibitors targeting an essential process in cell wall synthesis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . In this investigation, three DprE1 inhibitors currently in clinical trials, TBA-7371, PBTZ169 and OPC-167832, were evaluated side-by-side as single agents in the C3HeB/FeJ mouse model presenting with caseous necrotic pulmonary lesions upon tuberculosis infection. The goal was to confirm the efficacy of the DprE1 inhibitors in a mouse tuberculosis model with advanced pulmonary pathology, and perform comprehensive analysis of plasma, lung and lesion-centric drug levels to establish pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) parameters predicting efficacy at the site of infection. Results showed significant efficacy for all three DprE1 inhibitors in the C3HeB/FeJ mouse model after two months of treatment. Superior efficacy was observed for OPC-167832 even at low dose levels, which can be attributed to its low MIC, favorable distribution and sustained retention above the MIC throughout the dosing interval in caseous necrotic lesions where the majority of bacteria reside in C3HeB/FeJ mice. These results support further progression of the three drug candidates through clinical development for tuberculosis treatment.

Systematic measurement of combination drug landscapes to predict in vivo treatment outcomes for tuberculosis

A lengthy multidrug chemotherapy is required to achieve a durable cure in tuberculosis. Variation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug response is created by the differing microenvironments in lesions, which generate different bacterial drug susceptibilities. To better realize the potential of combination therapy to shorten treatment duration, multidrug therapy design should deliberately explore the vast combination space. We face a significant scaling challenge in making systematic drug combination measurements because it is not practical to use animal models for comprehensive drug combination studies, nor are there well-validated high-throughput in vitro models that predict animal outcomes. We hypothesized that we could both prioritize combination therapies and quantify the predictive power of various in vitro models for drug development using a dataset of drug combination dose responses measured in multiple in vitro models. We systematically measured M. tuberculosis response to all 2- and 3-drug combinations among ten antibiotics in eight conditions that reproduce lesion microenvironments. Applying machine learning to this comprehensive dataset, we developed classifiers predictive of multidrug treatment outcome in a mouse model of disease relapse. We trained classifiers on multiple mouse models and identified ensembles of in vitro models that best describe in vivo treatment outcomes. Furthermore, we found that combination synergies are less important for predicting outcome than metrics of potency. Here, we map a path forward to rationally prioritize combinations for animal and clinical studies using systematic drug combination measurements with validated in vitro models. Our pipeline is generalizable to other difficult-to-treat diseases requiring combination therapies.One Sentence SummarySignatures of in vitro potency and drug interaction measurements predict combination therapy outcomes in mouse models of tuberculosis.

An experience with Delamanid in an XDR TB case – Case report

Introduction: Tuberculosis is an endemic infection and a serious public health problem in India. India constitutes one fourth of the global TB population. The emerging drug resistance is a major threat to global tuberculosis care and control. Case report: We present an experience with a case of newly diagnosed microbiologically confirmed, extremely drug resistant primary pulmonary tuberculosis who was treated with delamanid and found to be cured of tuberculosis. Discussion: Delamanid is a new anti-tubercular drug, which is thought to primarily inhibit synthesis of methoxy-mycolic, and keto-mycolic acid, which are components of the mycobacterial cell wall. In our patient who was a newly diagnosed case of MDR-TB converted to XDR-TB in course of time and we were successful in treating him with delamanid therapy. His sputum culture conversion was achieved in 20 days. Even though the patient did not tolerate well because of the side effects of the drug, still he became microbiologically negative for tuberculosis. Conclusion: Delamanid fulfills many target criteria for new TB drugs and may be particularly useful for the treatment of MDR-TB. It can be administered orally and its bactericidal properties make it suitable in regimens designed to shorten treatment duration. Clinical efficacy data, while limited, are reassuring.

Inhibiting Mycobacterium tuberculosis within and without

Tuberculosis remains a scourge of global health with shrinking treatment options due to the spread of drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Intensive efforts have been made in the past 15 years to find leads for drug development so that better, more potent drugs inhibiting new targets could be produced and thus shorten treatment duration. Initial attempts focused on repurposing drugs that had been developed for other therapeutic areas but these agents did not meet their goals in clinical trials. Attempts to find new lead compounds employing target-based screens were unsuccessful as the leads were inactive against M. tuberculosis . Greater success was achieved using phenotypic screening against live tubercle bacilli and this gave rise to the drugs bedaquiline, pretomanid and delamanid, currently in phase III trials. Subsequent phenotypic screens also uncovered new leads and targets but several of these targets proved to be promiscuous and inhibited by a variety of seemingly unrelated pharmacophores. This setback sparked an interest in alternative screening approaches that mimic the disease state more accurately. Foremost among these were cell-based screens, often involving macrophages, as these should reflect the bacterium's niche in the host more faithfully. A major advantage of this approach is its ability to uncover functions that are central to infection but not necessarily required for growth in vitro . For instance, inhibition of virulence functions mediated by the ESX-1 secretion system severely attenuates intracellular M. tuberculosis , preventing intercellular spread and ultimately limiting tissue damage. Cell-based screens have highlighted the druggability of energy production via the electron transport chain and cholesterol metabolism. Here, I review the scientific progress and the pipeline, but warn against over-optimism due to the lack of industrial commitment for tuberculosis drug development and other socio-economic factors. This article is part of the themed issue ‘The new bacteriology’.

Combinations of R207910 with Drugs Used To Treat Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Have the Potential To Shorten Treatment Duration

ABSTRACT The objective of the present study was to identify the optimal R207910-containing regimen to administer to patients who cannot receive rifampin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) because of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), concomitant use of antiretroviral drugs, or toxicity. Mice were infected intravenously with 5 × 106 CFU of the H37Rv strain and treated five times per week with R207910 alone or various combinations of R207910 with the second-line drugs amikacin (AMK), pyrazinamide (PZA), moxifloxacin (MXF), and ethionamide (ETH). All R207910-containing regimens were significantly more active than the non-R207910-containing regimens after 1 month of therapy. When given for 2 months, R207910 alone was more active than the WHO standard first-line regimen RIF-INH-PZA. When R207910 was combined with second-line drugs, the combinations were more active than the currently recommended regimen of MDR-TB AMK-ETH-MXF-PZA, and culture negativity of both the lungs and spleen was reached after 2 months of treatment in almost every case.