Keadilan Organisasi dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Pegawai Dinas Koperasi Usaha Kecil dan Menengah Kabupaten Sleman dan Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil Kabupaten Sleman

This study aims to determine organizational justice and itseffect on organizational commitment in the Office of Small and Medium Enterprises Cooperatives of Sleman Regency and the Department of Population and Civil Registry of Sleman Regency.The sample used in this study amounted to 50 respondents. The sampling method using saturated sampling. The data analysis method used is quantitative analysis using validity and reliability tests, classical assumption tests, multiple regression analysis, t test, and the coefficient of determination. By using the multiple linear regression method, it can be concluded that Y1 = 3,946 + 0.443 X1 + 0.346 X2 + e and Y2 = 16,647 + 0.669 X1 -0.580 X2 + e. The results of simultaneous calculations at Y1 obtained partial test results t count (4.104)> t table (2.011), the significance of the variable distributive justice to the dependent variable, namely affective commitment of 0.000 or less than the alpha value of 0.05. Distributive justice variable has a significant effect on affective commitment or H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected. The procedural justice variable t count (2.452)> t table (2.011) the significance of the procedural justice variable on the dependent variable, namely affective commitment of 0.018 or less than the alpha value of 0.05. In conclusion, the value of t count> t table and the significance of 0.018 <0.05 means that the variable procedural justice has a significant effect on affective commitment or H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected. As for Y2, the simultaneous calculation results obtained by partial test results t count (3.103)> t table (2.011) the significance of distributive justice variables to the dependent variable, namely normative commitment of 0.003 or less than the alpha value of 0.05. In conclusion, the value of t count> t table and significance 0.003 <0.05 means that the variable distributive justice has a significant effect on normative commitment or H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected. The procedural justice variable t count (-2.057) <t table (2.011) the significance of the procedural justice variable on the dependent variable, namely the normative commitment of 0.045 or less than the alpha value of 0.05. In conclusion, the value of t count <t table and the significance of 0.045 <0.05 means that the normative justice variable has a significant effect on normative commitment or H1 is rejected and H0 is rejected. Keywords: distributive justice, procedural justice, affective commitment, and normative commitment

Elder Mediation Services Among Diverse Older Adult Communities in Australia: Practitioner Perspectives on Accessibility

Background and Objectives Elder abuse is a complex problem, and barriers to reporting and help-seeking include shame and fear of loss of relationships with key family members. Elder mediation has been identified as one promising method of alternative dispute resolution. This study aimed to investigate the accessibility of elder mediation services among diverse groups of older adults, from the perspective of practitioners in a large Australian jurisdiction. Research Design and Methods The study employed a sequential mixed-methods approach, comprising a thematic analysis of semistructured interviews (N = 17) and an online survey of practitioners (N = 49) involved in referral to, or provision of, elder mediation services. Accessibility was conceptualized using existing theoretical frameworks, spanning practical (logistics-related), and normative (justice- and culture-related) dimensions. Results Factors limiting accessibility of elder mediation services included lack of community and practitioner awareness of elder abuse and elder mediation, discomfort with the mediation process, financial costs, lack of services in regional and remote areas, and complex service systems for older people. Within the mediation process, difficulties in assessing and accommodating cognitive and other impairments, managing power imbalances, and determining the appropriateness of the dispute for mediation were influential. Discussion and Implications This study showed that mediation can be a promising and effective approach to resolving disputes involving older people. The emergent perceptive dimension (community and practitioner awareness) emphasizes the importance of awareness-raising efforts surrounding both elder abuse and the potential of mediation as a viable pathway, the training of elder-mediators as well as resourcing elder mediation services, especially in rural and remote locations.

Equality and Merit. Through Experiments to Normative Justice

When we want to justify claims against one another, we discover that conceptual thought alone is not sufficient to legitimize property and income in the relative and proper proportions among members of a productive group. Instead, the basis for justification should also be seen in motivational states, validated less by rational thought than by an effective behaviour. To circumnavigate otherwise dangerously utopian claims to justice, the social sciences, and especially behavioural economics, are the most reliable basis for normative distributive justice. This article builds on recent findings of experiments, first of all in order to give proof of the extent to which a general behavioural tendency towards equality is widespread among people, and second of all in order to highlight ‘desert’ and ‘need’ as the crucial criteria of just distribution, which will then sum up to justified inequality in the economic sphere.

Speaking in Multiple Registers

The framework of legal pluralism has conventionally posed customary norms against official Hindu law and prioritizes inheritance law as the only systemic mode for the transmission of family property. It has led to a scholarly neglect of the practices of gift and contract, which the author sees as alternative modes of sharing/devolving property to kin with weak inheritance rights. The chapter traces how, below the judicial radar, compensation for caregiving through gift and contract constituted a common ground of argument and negotiation among peasant litigants of the Garhwal Himalayas in the early twentieth century. It recovers ideas of normative justice through litigants’ speech, which never found their way into the corpus juris of either Hindu Law or custom.