computed tomography dose index
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

58
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 189
Author(s):  
Ni Larasati Kartika Sari ◽  
Deni Tiko Bahagia ◽  
Puji Hartoyo ◽  
Dewi Muliyati

<p class="AbstractHeading">ABSTRACT</p><p class="AbstractText">The aim of this research was to evaluate the effects of two different dose protocols’ usage on image quality. This research was performed on three different CT Scanners using high dose and low dose protocols of thorax scan. Different exposure parameters were used, depending on each scanner’s setting. GE QA CT Scan phantom was used for image quality assessment.  Image quality measured were CT number accuracy, uniformity and linearity, noise uniformity, spatial resolution and Contrast To Noise Ratio (CNR). CT Scan’s dose index, CTDIvol (Volumetric Computed Tomography Dose Index), was also measured to evaluate how these two protocols work in reducing radiation dose. The result showed that the usage of low dose protocols reduce the CTDIvol value at 85-91% compared to the high dose protocols, meanwhile most of the image quality parameters obtained from both protocols were still considered good. The CT number accuracy, uniformity, linearity and noise uniformity for all CT Scans were all still inside BAPETEN’s (Indonesia National Regulator Agency) threshold. There were 20-23% difference on the spatial resolution value measured from both protocols. The most significant difference came from CNR. The CNR obtained from high dose protocols were 65-93% higher than the one from low dose protocols.   </p><p class="AbstractText">Keywords: contrast to noise ratio, CTDIvol, CT number, spatial resolution</p><p class="AbstractHeading">ABSTRAK</p><p>Penelitian ini mengevaluasi pengaruh penggunanaan protokol dosis tinggi dan protokol dosis rendah terhadap kualitias citra dan dosis khususnya pada pemeriksaan CT Scan thorax. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada 3 sampel CT Scan yang berbeda. Faktor eksposi yang digunakan berbeda untuk tiap scanner, bergantung pada setting yang terdapat pada scanner. Fantom yagdigunakan untuk menilai kualitas citra adalah fantom GE QA CT Scan. Adapun kualitas citra yang diukur adalah keseragaman, akurasi, dan linearitas CT number, keseragaman noise, resolusi spasial, serta <em>Contrast to Noise Ratio</em> (CNR). Sementara dosis radiasi yang diamati adalah CTDIvol (Volumetrik <em>Computed Tomography Dose Index</em>) yang tampil pada konsol. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan protokol dosis rendah mampu mengurangi nilai CTDIvol sebesar 85-91% dibanding dengan protokol dosis tinggi, sementara sebagian besar parameter kualitas citra yang diukur masih dinilai baik. Nilai akurasi, keseragaman, dan linearitas CT number  serta keseragaman noise pada protokol dosis tinggi dan dosis rendah, keseluruhannya masih dalam batas ambang BAPETEN. Terdapat perbedaan sebesar 20-23% pada nilai resolusi spasial yang terukur dari  kedua protokol. Nilai CNR pada protokol dosis tinggi lebih baik dari pada protokol dosis rendah, dengan perbedaan yang cukup signifikan, yaitu 65-93%.</p><p class="AbstractText">Kata kunci: <em>contrast to noise ratio</em>, CTDIvol, <em>CT number</em>, resolusi spasial</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafaela Meneses ◽  
Bruno Dias ◽  
Andrea Pimenta ◽  
Graciano Paulo ◽  
Joana Santos

Abstract Background The purpose of this study is to analyse paediatric head Computed Tomography (CT) examination dose values, establish local Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL), and perform objective image quality assessment per categorisation. Methods A total of 100 paediatric head CT examinations divided into 5 paediatric age categorisations were retrospectively selected: 0–3months, 3months to 1 year, 1 to 6 years, and more than 6 years. Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDIvol - mGy) and Dose Lenght Product (DLP – mGy.cm), acquisition mode and CT scanner were collected per examination. Examinations with lower and higher dose values per categorisation were selected, and 10 Regions of Interest (ROI’s) were defined on supra and infra tentorial regions in order to access image quality, based on signal and noise values. Local DRLs were compare with the literature and with previous studies of this centre. Results The obtained DLP values were 580, 570, 700, 754 mGy.cm, for the categorisation of 0–3 months, 3 months to 1 year, 1 to 6 years, and more than 6 years, respectively. No significant differences were founded in dose values and image quality, per paediatric categorisation. Conclusions Despise previous local DRLs were defined using a different age categorisation, some paediatric aged categorisation revealed an increase of the dose values. These results must be related with the acquisition of a new CT scanner. Optimisation process is on-going and new protocols are being define.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-230
Author(s):  
Chikezie Chukwuemeka Udo ◽  
Akintayo Daniel Omojola ◽  
Chukwuemeka Christian Nzotta

Objective: The study is aimed at optimizing the existing CT protocol for head scans in a Specialist Teaching Hospital in Edo State with a 16-slice Siemens Somatom Emotion scanner. Also, the study determined the volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and Dose Length Product (DLP) from the patient's dose profiles. The results from this study were compared with relevant studies. Materials and Methods: The scanner was used to acquire head CT of 160 patients retrospectively. Also, a locally designed head phantom was used to simulate individual patients using a similar protocol by changing the tube current (mA) and total scan width (TSW) only from the existing protocol. Results: Percentage dose reduction (PDR) for the CTDIvol and DLP ranged 42.00-46.80% and 37.13-43.54% respectively. The optimized CTDIvol and DLP were lowest compared to studies in the United Kingdom (UK), Italy, India, Ireland, Sudan, Nigeria, European Commission (EC), United States of America (USA) and Japan. Only the DLP for India was lower than our optimized value. Conclusion: The need to understudy CT configuration is necessary, this will allow end-users to optimize certain parameters in the CT scanner, which will reduce the patient dose without compromising image quality


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anwuli Christiana Tobi ◽  
Chukwuka Emmanuel Mokobia ◽  
Joyce Ekeme Ikubor ◽  
Akintayo Daniel Omojola

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the mean volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) for the standard head and body phantoms and locally designed head and body phantoms respectively. Similarly, this study determined and compared the displayed mean CTDIvol and Dose Length Product (DLP) for the above phantoms from the CT monitor. In addition, the percentage deviations of both phantoms were compared with the recommended limits from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the American College of Radiologists (ACR). Materials and Methods: Dose measurements were made using a standard polymethymethacrylate (PMMA) phantom for head and body as well as a locally designed phantom with four CT scanners using thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs). The locally designed phantoms were made using a PMMA sheet, which was bent to give the desired cylindrical shape and was made like the standard phantoms. The constructed phantom was filled with water and the TLD chips were inserted into the center and peripheries of the phantoms to obtain the absorbed doses. Results: The CTDIvol for the standard head and body phantom for center A was 66.97 and 21.85mGy and for B was 23.39 and 6.29mGy respectively. Similarly, the CTDIvol for the constructed head and body phantom for center A was 63.91 and 19.84mGy and for B was 24.67 and 6.30mGy respectively. The uncertainty between the standard and constructed head phantoms for centers A and B was 4.6 and 5.5% respectively, while that of the standard and constructed body phantoms for centers A and B was 9.2 and 0.0% respectively. The maximum percent deviation from the console CTDIvol and DLP values with the four phantoms for centers A and B was within ±20%. The mean correction factors for the head and body were 0.998 and 1.05 respectively. Conclusion: The uncertainties obtained in this study were within the IAEA and ACR recommended value of ±20%. The constructed phantom proved useful for CT dose measurements.


Author(s):  
Rodrigo Antonio Pereira MAURO ◽  
Alessandro Martins da COSTA

ABSTRACT Objective Quantify the CTDI from a reference beam, correcting this value for several beam widths from the ratio of CTDI100 values measured in the air, and verifying the underestimation of the dose comparing CTDI100 and CTDI300, applied to dental CBCT. Methods i-CAT and Prexion 3D tomographs, 100mm pencil ionization chamber, electrometer. Firstly for beam above 40 mm, CTDIW,NT from CTDIW,Ref, multiplied by the ratio of CTDIAR measurements to N.T widths and reference, was estimated. In second, CTDI100 and CTDI300 are obtained by displacing the ionization chamber along the beam with spacing intervals equal to 100 mm to cover sufficiently large integration intervals for CBCT protocols, and a comparison is made through the modified efficiency. Results CTDIAR,100,Ref averaged 53% higher than CTDIW,Ref, due to attenuation of the beam by the simulator object, and the ratio between CTDIAR,100,Ref and CTDIW,Ref is greater than 1, being this constant relationship and validating the method for dosimetry in quality control tests. For the second method, CTDI100 greatly underestimates the dose deposited on the central axis, where CTDI300 covers all beam sizes and stands out in relation to CTDI100 to more accurately quantify the radiation levels emitted. Conclusions The IEC method is applicable to quality control, facilitating practice, and optimizing time and resources. CTDI300 is a better dose descriptor than CTDI100, and should be implemented for CBCT modalities when used.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 900-907
Author(s):  
M. Mkimel ◽  
R. El Baydaoui ◽  
M. R. Mesradi ◽  
Z. Tahiri ◽  
K. Talasmat ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 190 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-371
Author(s):  
Nadia Khelassi-Toutaoui ◽  
Ahmed Merad ◽  
Virginia Tsapaki ◽  
Fouzia Meddad ◽  
Zakia Sakhri-Brahimi ◽  
...  

Abstract A pilot study has concerned the most frequent computed tomography examinations (CT). This represents the first results based on actual survey for diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) establishment in Algeria. A total number of 2540 patients underwent this survey that has included the recording of CT parameters, computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product of the head, thorax, abdomen, abdomen–pelvis (AP), lumbar spine (LS) and thorax–abdomen–pelvis (TAP) performed on standard patients. The proposed DRLs are 71 mGy/1282 mGy.cm for head, 16 mGy/555 mGy.cm for thorax, 18 mGy/671 mGy.cm for abdomen, 21 mGy/950 mGy.cm for AP, 36 mGy/957 mGy.cm for LS and 18 mGy/994 mGy.cm for TAP. The rounded 75th percentile seems to be higher in some examinations compared to the literature. Our findings confirm the need to optimise our practice. These results provide a starting point for institutional evaluation of CT radiation doses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 190 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-249
Author(s):  
Mohamed M Abuzaid ◽  
Wiam Elshami ◽  
A El Serafi ◽  
T Hussien ◽  
J R McConnell ◽  
...  

Abstract This multicenter study evaluated computed tomography dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) to contribute to establishing computed tomography (CT) national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Data from 240 patients, who underwent CT head, chest, abdomen–pelvis and urography examinations, were analyzed, including patient age, sex and weight, CTDIvol (mGy) and DLP (mGy cm). The proposed DRLs for each examination were calculated as the third quartile. DRLs are proposed using CTDIvol (mGy) and DLP (mGy cm) for CT head (67 and 1189, respectively), chest (8 and 302, respectively), abdomen–pelvis (28 and 1122, respectively) and urography (20 and 714, respectively). These values are comparable with the initial NDRLs and published international DRLs. Baseline values for International Radiology Center (IRC) CT DRLs were calculated on frequently performed CT examinations. Implementation of DRL values improves dose optimization based on procedures, scanner type and patient characteristics while maintaining acceptable image quality and diagnostic confidence.


2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (05) ◽  
pp. 1285-1289
Author(s):  
H. Osman ◽  
Aseel Alotaibi ◽  
Nawaf Alotaibi ◽  
Fahad Alotaibi ◽  
Mohannad Alqhtani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document