A Novel Manufacturing Process for Glass THGEMs and First Characterisation in an Optical Gaseous Argon TPC

This paper details a novel, patent pending, abrasive machining manufacturing process for the formation of sub-millimetre holes in THGEMs, with the intended application in gaseous and dual-phase TPCs. Abrasive machining favours a non-ductile substrate such as glasses or ceramics. This innovative manufacturing process allows for unprecedented versatility in THGEM substrates, electrodes, and hole geometry and pattern. Consequently, THGEMs produced via abrasive machining can be tailored for specific properties: for example, high stiffness, low total thickness variation, radiopurity, moisture absorption/outgassing and/or carbonisation resistance. This paper specifically focuses on three glass substrate THGEMs (G-THGEMs) made from Schott Borofloat 33 and fused silica. Circular and hexagonal hole shapes are also investigated. The G-THGEM electrodes are made from indium tin oxide (ITO), with a resistivity of 150 Ω/Sq. All G-THGEMs were characterised in an optical (EMCCD) readout GArTPC and compared to a traditionally manufactured FR4 THGEM, with their charging and secondary scintillation (S2) light production behaviour analysed.

Fatigue and Mechanical Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with CrN and TiN Coating Deposited by Magnetic Filtered Cathodic Vacuum Arc Process

Coatings of 3 μm CrN and TiN were prepared by a magnetic filtered cathodic vacuum arc process (MFCVA) on Ti-6Al-4V substrates, respectively. Rotating bending tests and uniaxial tests were conducted for investigating the effect of the thin and uniformly distributed hard CrN and TiN coatings on the fatigue and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V substrate. During both tests, no coating spallation phenomenon was observed, which indicated that the hard coating bound well with the substrate. The fatigue test results showed that the fatigue strength of the coated sample was decreased in both the low- and high-cycling fatigue regimes compared with the uncoated Ti-6Al-4V substrate. Compared with the TiN coating, the CrN coating caused a more significant reduction on the fatigue property of the uncoated Ti-6Al-4V substrate due to its inferior plastic deformation capacity. Furthermore, the tensile test results showed that the coated sample had a relative higher ultimate strength, yield strength, and lower elongation compared with the uncoated Ti-6Al-4V substrate. This may be due to the fact that the hard coating could suppress the initiation of cracks, and so higher stress was needed for crack initiating. During the crack propagation period, the hard coating cracked at a relative higher velocity, which led to cracking of the ductile substrate and elongation reduction.