626 ENDOSCOPIC VACUUM THERAPY FOR ANASTOMOTIC LEAK IN ESOPHAGECTOMY AND TOTAL GASTRECTOMY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

One of the main complications related to esophagogastric surgery, due to esophageal and gastric cancer, is the anastomotic leak. The placement of endoluminal stents is the most frequent endoscopic therapy in these cases. However, since its introduction, endoscopic vacuum therapy has been shown to be a promising alternative. This study primarily aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic vacuum therapy for the treatment of anastomotic leak in esophagectomy and total gastrectomy. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Studies that evaluated the use of endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leak in esophagectomy and total gastrectomy were included. Results Twenty-three articles were included. A total of 559 patients were evaluated. Endoscopic vacuum therapy showed a fistulous orifice closure rate of 81.6% (rate: 0.816; 95% CI: 0.777–0.864) and, when compared to the stent, there is a 16% difference in favor of endoscopic vacuum therapy (risk difference [RD]: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.05–0.27). The risk for mortality in the endoscopic vacuum therapy was 10% lower than in endoluminal stent therapy (RD: −0.10; 95% CI: −0.18 to −0.02). Conclusion Endoscopic vacuum therapy might have a higher rate of fistulous orifice closure and a lower rate of mortality, compared to intraluminal stenting.

Diaphragmatic herniation after esophagogastric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction The anatomy of the esophageal hiatus is altered during esophagogastric surgery with an increased risk of postoperative hiatus hernia (HH). The purpose of this article was to examine the current evidence on the surgical management and outcomes associated with HH after esophagogastric surgery for cancer. Materials and methods Systematic review and meta-analysis. Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE data sets were consulted. Results Twenty-seven studies were included for a total of 404 patients requiring surgical treatment for HH after esophagogastric surgery. The age of the patients ranged from 35 to 85 years, and the majority were males (82.3%). Abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, and dyspnea were the commonly reported symptoms. An emergency repair was required in 51.5%, while a minimally invasive repair was performed in 48.5%. Simple suture cruroplasty and mesh reinforced repair were performed in 65% and 35% of patients, respectively. The duration between the index procedure and HH repair ranged from 3 to 144 months, with the majority (67%) occurring within 24 months. The estimated pooled prevalence rates of pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak, overall morbidity, and mortality were 14.1% (95% CI = 8.0–22.0%), 1.4% (95% CI = 0.8–2.2%), 35% (95% CI = 20.0–54.0%), and 5.0% (95% CI = 3.0–8.0%), respectively. The postoperative follow-up ranged from 1 to 110 months (mean = 24) and the pooled prevalence of HH recurrence was 16% (95% CI = 13.0–21.6%). Conclusions Current evidence reporting data for HH after esophagogastric surgery is narrow. The overall postoperative pulmonary complications, overall morbidity, and mortality are 14%, 35%, and 5%, respectively. Additional studies are required to define indications and treatment algorithm and evaluate the best technique for crural repair at the index operation in an attempt to minimize the risk of HH.

Minimally Invasive Oncologic Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery can be Performed Safely on all Weekdays: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Background Existing literature suggests deteriorating surgical outcome of esophagogastric surgery as the week progresses. However, these studies were conducted in the pre-centralization and pre-minimally invasive era. In addition, they failed to correct for fixed weekdays of esophagogastric cancer surgery among hospitals. This study aimed to describe the impact of weekday of minimally invasive upper gastrointestinal surgery on short-term surgical outcomes. Methods All patients registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit who underwent curative minimally invasive esophageal or gastric carcinoma surgery in 2015–2019, were included in this nationwide cohort study. Using multilevel multivariable logistic regression, the impact of weekday of surgery on 14 short-term surgical outcomes was investigated. To correct for interhospital variance in fixed weekday(s) of surgery multilevel analyses was used. Results were adjusted for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results This study included 4,102 patients undergoing minimally invasive upper gastrointestinal surgery (2,968 esophageal cancer and 1,134 gastric cancer patients). Weekday of surgery did not impact postoperative complications, severe postoperative complications, surgical/technical complications, medical complications, anastomotic leakage, complicated postoperative course, failure to rescue, surgical radicality, lymph node yield, 30-day/in-hospital mortality, reinterventions, length of ICU stay, 30-day readmission, and textbook outcome after neither esophageal cancer nor gastric cancer surgery. Conclusions Minimally invasive esophagogastric surgery can be performed safely on all weekdays with respect to short-term surgical outcomes, which is important information for operation room scheduling.

O94 GASTRIC CONDUIT NECROSIS AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY: RISK PREDICTION, MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES

Background Acute gastric conduit necrosis (AGCN) is a serious early complication of esophagectomy that can result in loss of the gastric conduit. The reported incidence is relatively low: 0.5-3.2%. Literature is thus scarce. However, vascular comorbidity has been shown to be a risk factor. This study aimed to assess the arterial calcification scores, clinical presentation, management, and outcome of patients who suffered from AGCN following esophagectomy in a high volume centre for esophageal cancer surgery. Methods Patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were selected (Jan-2011 till Feb-2019) from a prospectively maintained single-centre database that contains the patient characteristics, treatment details, and postoperative outcomes of all patients undergoing esophagogastric surgery. For the AGCN cases, additional information regarding their clinical course was retrieved from the electronic patient files. Arterial calcification scores were established by measuring calcifications at 4 arterial locations on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Results From a total of 466 esophagectomies performed in the inclusion period, AGCN occurred in 8 cases (1.7%). Resection of the gastric conduit was required in 5 of these patients, of whom 3 patients had a fatal outcome. The other patients were successfully treated by conservative treatment involving a nil by mouth regimen (n=2) or a self-expanding metal stent (n=1). There was a high prevalence of supra-aortic (75%) and thoracic (87.5%) calcifications in the patients suffering from AGCN. Conclusion AGCN is a rare but serious complication following esophagectomy, with a high mortality. Patients with generalized vascular disease may be at particular risk of developing this complication.

Gastropericardial fistula: A rare etiology of chest pain

Gastropericardial fistula is an abnormal communication between the stomach and the pericardium. It is a rare, life-threatening condition that has numerous etiologies. We report the case of a 53-year-old male patient, with a history of wedge resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumor, who presented to the emergency department for epigastric and chest pain along with lethargy leading to the uncommon diagnosis of gastropericardial fistula with pneumopericardium. Through this case, we would like to draw clinicians’ attention to gastropericardial fistula as a differential diagnosis in patients presenting for epigastric and/or chest pain with a history of esophagogastric surgery, emphasizing on the key role of computed tomography in this regard, and underscore the management basics of this unusual condition.

Postprandial hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia in a child as a late complication of esophageal reconstruction

Background:Postprandial hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (PHH) is an increasingly recognized complication of gastric bypass surgery in obese adults, distinct from the “dumping syndrome”.Case presentation:Upon birth, primary repair of esophageal atresia was performed, and at the age of 14 months definite esophageal reconstruction was performed. At the age of 3 years, recurrent brief episodes of symptomatic hypoglycemia started. At the age of 5.7 years the girl was admitted to our clinic and investigations indicated hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and continuous glucose monitoring results revealed frequent postprandial hypoglycemic events, which were always preceded by early postprandial hyperglycemia. It was concluded that the patient had PHH caused by a delayed and hyperinsulinemic response to carbohydrate intake as a result of esophagogastric surgery. Treatment with acarbose was titrated using flash glucose monitoring, which resulted in satisfactory glucose regulation.Conclusions:This is the first described case of a child with PHH following esophageal reconstruction.