Trunk Posture during Manual Materials Handling of Beer Kegs

Craft brewing is a rapidly growing industry in the U.S. Most craft breweries are small businesses with few resources for robotic or other mechanical-assisted equipment, requiring work to be performed manually by employees. Craft brewery workers frequently handle stainless steel half-barrel kegs, which weigh between 13.5 kg (29.7 lbs.) empty and 72.8 kg (161.5 lbs.) full. Moving kegs may be associated with low back pain and even injury. In the present study, researchers performed a quantitative assessment of trunk postures using an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based kinematic measurement system while workers lifted kegs at a craft brewery. Results of this field-based study indicated that during keg handling, craft brewery workers exhibited awkward and non-neutral trunk postures. Based on the results of the posture data, design recommendations were identified to reduce the hazardous exposure for musculoskeletal disorders among craft brewery workers.

A Methodology to Evaluate the Effects of Kinematic Measurement Uncertainties on Knee Ligament Properties Estimated From Laxity Measurements

Ligaments are important joint stabilizers but assessing their mechanical properties remain challenging. We developed a methodology to investigate the effects of kinematic measurement uncertainty during laxity tests on optimization-based estimation of ligament properties. We applied this methodology to a subject-specific knee model with known ligament properties as inputs and compared the estimated to the known knee ligament properties under the influence of noise. Four different sets of laxity tests were simulated with an increasing number of load cases, capturing anterior/posterior, varus/valgus, and internal/external rotation loads at 0 deg and 30 deg of knee flexion. 20 samples of uniform random noise ([−0.5,0.5] mm and degrees) were added to each set and fed into an optimization routine that subsequently estimated the ligament properties based on the noise targets. We found a large range of estimated ligament properties (stiffness ranges of 5.97 kN, 7.64 kN, 8.72 kN, and 3.86 kN; reference strain ranges of 3.11%, 2.53%, 1.88%, and 1.58% for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), medical collateral ligament (MCL), and lateral collateral ligament (LCL), respectively) for three sets of laxity tests, including up to 22 load cases. A set of laxity tests with 60 load cases kept the stiffness and reference strain ranges below 470 N per unit strain and 0.85%, respectively. These results illustrate that kinematic measurement noise have a large impact on estimated ligament properties and we recommend that future studies assess and report both the estimated ligament properties and the associated uncertainties due to kinematic measurement noise.

Validation of a method to measure three-dimensional hip joint kinematics in subjects with femoroacetabular impingement

Introduction: A kinematic measurement method combining dynamic motion and imaging, which captures the behaviour of the hip at terminal motion, may offer improved diagnostic accuracy and enhance our understanding of the mechanics of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Methods: 3 embalmed cadaveric hip/pelvis specimens with implanted Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) beads were mounted on a custom rig and imaged with a fluoroscope in four poses to simulate a clinical impingement examination: in hip extension and in three positions: near impingement, early impingement and late impingement while simulating a flexion/adduction/internal rotation manoeuvre. Hip joint kinematics were measured using 2 methods and compared: RSA (gold standard) and a custom 3-dimensional to 2-dimensional (3D–2D) image registration method which matches 3D models developed from CT to 2D fluoroscopic images. Results: Using RSA as the gold standard, bias and precision of hip joint rotations measured using 3D–2D registration demonstrated maximums of 1.64° and 3.96°, respectively. However, if the single outlier was removed, bias and precision were 0.55° and 1.38°. Bias and precision of translations had maximums of 0.51 mm and 0.77 mm, respectively. Conclusions: This 3D to 2D registration method may offer a clinically useful solution for dynamic assessment of hip impingement. If 5-mm translation and 10° of rotation represent a clinically significant difference in hip kinematics, the method’s accuracy of approximately 1 mm displacement and 1° rotation should enable detection of significant clinical differences.