Background: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a nerve pain disease usually controlled
by different therapies, i.e., topical therapies, antiepileptics, analgesics, antipsychotics,
antidepressants, anti-dementia drugs, antivirals, amitriptyline, fluphenazine, and
magnesium sulfate. It is believed that different therapies may lead to different levels of
pain relief.
Objectives: We proposed this study to compare the efficacy of PHN treatments.
Study Design: We conducted a systematic review of the current literature. All relevant
studies were retrieved from online databases. The standardized mean difference (SMD)
was used for pain relief measurement in different PHN therapies.
Setting: A conventional meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis (NMA) were carried
out together with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for each
therapy calculated regarding their efficacy.
Results: A pairwise meta-analysis suggested that 4 treatment classes, including topical
therapies, antiepileptics, analgesics, and antidepressants, exhibited better pain relief
results than placebo. Likewise, a NMA suggested that patients with 4 treatment classes
exhibited significant improvements in pain scores compared to those with placebo.
Limitations: There is a lack of direct head-to-head comparisons of some treatments,
especially for antivirals, anti-dementia drugs, and magnesium sulfate. Secondly, the
specific agents belonging to the same class of therapies might exhibit different effects
(gabapentin and carisbamate) with different mechanisms (opioids and ketamine) on
reducing pain, and some agents were hard to find in literatures and were not involved in
our study, which may influence our results.
Conclusions: Analgesics were preferable to other treatments with respect to pain relief
for PHN, while antivirals appeared to be less effective than other therapies.
Key words: Postherpetic neuralgia, topical agents, antiepileptics, analgesics,
antipsychotics, antidepressants