soil carbon stabilization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

31
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Geoderma ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 403 ◽  
pp. 115384
Author(s):  
Minhuang Wang ◽  
Yaling Zhang ◽  
Zhiqun Huang ◽  
Jianming Xue ◽  
Maria Jesus Gutierrez-Gines

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan C. L. Nickels ◽  
Cindy E. Prescott

Vegetation plays an important role in determining soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, and influences the mechanisms through which SOC is stabilized within the soil. The type of vegetation selected for use in reclamation may therefore influence the accumulation rate and residence time of SOC in these ecosystems. Earlier studies at reclaimed sites in the Alberta Oil Sands demonstrated that reclaimed ecosystems planted with deciduous trees accumulated the most soil organic matter in the top 10 cm of reclamation material, followed by grass sites, while coniferous sites accumulated the least SOM. The objective of this study was to assess differences in SOC stabilization in the upper 10 cm of soil among revegetated deciduous, coniferous and grass ecosystems 20–40 years following reclamation. We compared soil C in unprotected, physically protected, and chemically protected forms among the three reclamation treatments using density flotation to isolate free particulate (unprotected) SOC from the soil sample, and size fractionation to separate the remaining sample into heavy particulate (physically protected) SOC and mineral-associated (chemically protected) SOC. In addition to this analysis, we used NaOCl oxidation to distinguish chemically resistant and chemically oxidizable C stocks. Chemically resistant C was consistent across all vegetation treatments at approximately 25% of total soil C, while the remaining 75% was chemically oxidizable. Total SOC stocks were also not significantly different among vegetation treatments. Deciduous sites had 57.8 Mg ha–1 SOC, grass sites had 52.7 Mg ha–1 SOC, and coniferous sites had 43.7 Mg ha–1 SOC. Two-thirds of total SOC at grass sites was in protected forms, compared to half of total SOC at coniferous sites and one-third of total SOC at deciduous sites (33.6, 22.6, and 15.6 Mg ha–1, respectively). Grass sites had significantly more physically protected SOC than deciduous sites while deciduous sites had more unprotected SOC than grass sites. Our findings indicate that the type of vegetation selected for reclaimed areas has important implications for soil carbon in persistent versus unprotected pools.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Overy ◽  
Madison A. Bell ◽  
Jemaneh Habtewold ◽  
Bobbi L. Helgason ◽  
Edward G. Gregorich

Evidence-based decisions governing sustainable agricultural land management practices require a mechanistic understanding of soil organic matter (SOM) transformations and stabilization of carbon in soil. Large amounts of carbon from organic fertilizers, root exudates, and crop residues are input into agricultural soils. Microbes then catalyze soil biogeochemical processes including carbon extracellular transformation, mineralization, and assimilation of resources that are later returned to the soil as metabolites and necromass. A systems biology approach for a holistic study of the transformation of carbon inputs into stable SOM requires the use of soil “omics” platforms (metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics, and metabolomics). Linking the data derived from these various platforms will enhance our knowledge of structure and function of the microbial communities involved in soil carbon cycling and stabilization. In this review, we discuss the application, potential, and suitability of different “omics” approaches (independently and in combination) for elucidating processes involved in the transformation of stable carbon in soil. We highlight biases associated with these approaches including limitations of the methods, experimental design, and soil sampling, as well as those associated with data analysis and interpretation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 47-81
Author(s):  
Jiri Holatko ◽  
Jitka Prichystalova ◽  
Tereza Hammerschmiedt ◽  
Rahul Datta ◽  
Ram Swaroop Meena ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-46
Author(s):  
Jitka Prichystalova ◽  
Jiri Holatko ◽  
Tereza Hammerschmiedt ◽  
Rahul Datta ◽  
Ram Swaroop Meena ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document