navigated ultrasound
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

25
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Roberto Giammalva ◽  
Sofia Musso ◽  
Giuseppe Salvaggio ◽  
Maria Angela Pino ◽  
Rosa Maria Gerardi ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) is becoming more and more adopted in neurosurgery, since it has been associated to greater extent of resection (EOR) and to gross total resection (GTR) during brain tumor surgery. IOUS main limitations are spatial resolution, width and orientation of the field of view and scan quality, which are operator-dependent. Furthermore, most neurosurgeons are not confident with this technique, which needs a long learning curve in order to identify and interpret anatomic structures. OBJECTIVE To describe an effective procedure to take advantages of both IOUS and neuronavigation in case of lack of a navigated ultrasound system. METHODS We propose a reliable “indirect-navigated” technique which is based on the optical tracking of un-navigated IOUS probe by the use of a multipurpose passive tracker and a proper configuration of common neuronavigation system. RESULTS Navigated IOUS is not available in all neurosurgical operating rooms but ultrasound systems are common tools in many hospital facilities and neuronavigation systems are common in almost all the neurosurgical operating rooms. The proposed indirect-navigated technique shows some paramount advantages: since almost all the neurosurgical operating rooms are provided with a neuronavigation system, the only tool needed is the ultrasonography. Therefore, this procedure is largely accessible and costless, reliable, and may improve the neurosurgeon's ability in ultrasonographic anatomy. CONCLUSION This technique is based on the coplanar and coupled use of both un-navigated IOUS probe and standard optical neuronavigation, in order to allow the intraoperative navigation of IOUS images when a navigated ultrasound system is not available.


Author(s):  
Jonathan Shapey ◽  
Thomas Dowrick ◽  
Rémi Delaunay ◽  
Eleanor C. Mackle ◽  
Stephen Thompson ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Image-guided surgery (IGS) is an integral part of modern neuro-oncology surgery. Navigated ultrasound provides the surgeon with reconstructed views of ultrasound data, but no commercial system presently permits its integration with other essential non-imaging-based intraoperative monitoring modalities such as intraoperative neuromonitoring. Such a system would be particularly useful in skull base neurosurgery. Methods We established functional and technical requirements of an integrated multi-modality IGS system tailored for skull base surgery with the ability to incorporate: (1) preoperative MRI data and associated 3D volume reconstructions, (2) real-time intraoperative neurophysiological data and (3) live reconstructed 3D ultrasound. We created an open-source software platform to integrate with readily available commercial hardware. We tested the accuracy of the system’s ultrasound navigation and reconstruction using a polyvinyl alcohol phantom model and simulated the use of the complete navigation system in a clinical operating room using a patient-specific phantom model. Results Experimental validation of the system’s navigated ultrasound component demonstrated accuracy of $$<4.5\,\hbox {mm}$$ < 4.5 mm and a frame rate of 25 frames per second. Clinical simulation confirmed that system assembly was straightforward, could be achieved in a clinically acceptable time of $$<15\,\hbox {min}$$ < 15 min and performed with a clinically acceptable level of accuracy. Conclusion We present an integrated open-source research platform for multi-modality IGS. The present prototype system was tailored for neurosurgery and met all minimum design requirements focused on skull base surgery. Future work aims to optimise the system further by addressing the remaining target requirements.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. E14
Author(s):  
Prakash Shetty ◽  
Ujwal Yeole ◽  
Vikas Singh ◽  
Aliasgar Moiyadi

OBJECTIVEIntraoperative imaging is increasingly being used for resection control in diffuse gliomas, in which the extent of resection (EOR) is important. Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) has emerged as a highly effective tool in this context. Navigated ultrasound (NUS) combines the benefits of real-time imaging with the benefits of navigation guidance. In this study, the authors investigated the use of NUS as an intraoperative adjunct for resection control in gliomas.METHODSThe authors retrospectively analyzed 210 glioma patients who underwent surgery using NUS at their center. The analysis included intraoperative decision-making, diagnostic accuracy, and operative outcomes, particularly EOR and related factors influencing this.RESULTSUS-defined gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 57.6% of patients. Intermediate resection control scans were evaluable in 115 instances. These prompted a change in the operative decision in 42.5% of cases (the majority being further resection of unanticipated residual tumor). Eventual MRI-defined GTR rates were similar (58.6%), although the concordance between US and MRI was 81% (170/210 cases). There were 21 false positives and 19 false negatives with NUS, resulting in a sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 83%, positive predictive value of 77%, and negative predictive value of 84%. A large proportion of patients (13/19 patients, 68%) with false-negative results eventually had near-total resections. Tumor resectability, delineation, enhancement pattern, eloquent location, and US image resolution significantly influenced the GTR rate, though only resectability and eloquent location were significant on multivariate analysis.CONCLUSIONSNUS is a useful intraoperative adjunct for resection control in gliomas, detecting unanticipated tumor residues and positively influencing the course of the resection, eventually leading to higher resection rates. Nevertheless, resection is determined by the innate resectability of the tumor and its relationship to eloquent location, reinforcing the need to combine iUS with functional mapping techniques to optimize resections.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 787-794
Author(s):  
Ga Young Yoon ◽  
Hye-Joung Eom ◽  
Woo Jung Choi ◽  
Eun Young Chae ◽  
Joo Hee Cha ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (03) ◽  
pp. 146-152

Abstract Purpose To report the feasibility, accuracy and initial clinical experience of the use of real-time magnetic resonance navigated ultrasound (rtMRnUS) in the surgical planning of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) via guide wire insertion. Materials and Methods 29 participants were recruited into this prospective ethics committee approved study. The first 4 cases were utilized as a training set. Participants underwent a supine contrast-enhanced breast MR examination with external fiducials and corresponding ink marks placed on the skin of the affected breast to act as co-registration pairs. MR examinations included both functional and morphological images. A LOGIQ E9 ultrasound system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) equipped with a 6 – 15 MHz transducer was utilized for rtMRnUS. To facilitate point co-registration of the previously acquired MR dataset with the real-time ultrasound, co-registration pairs were identified on both imaging modalities. The following co-registration quality metrics were recorded: root mean square deviation (RMSD), lesion and global accuracies. Post co-registration guide wire insertion was performed. Results Co-registration was successfully undertaken in all participants. Results from 25 participants are presented. The median (min, max) RMSD was 3.3 mm (0.6 mm, 8.8 mm). The global accuracy was assessed as very good (8), good (12), moderate (3) and poor (2) while the median (min, max) lesion accuracy was recorded at 8.9 mm (2.1 mm, 33.2 mm). Conclusion The use of rtMRnUS to facilitate guide wire insertion is a feasible technique. Generally, very good or good global registration can be expected. Lesion accuracy results indicate that a median difference, in 3 D space, of 9 mm can be expected between imaging modalities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Marques ◽  
Tobias Martin ◽  
Franziska Fiedler ◽  
Mathias Weber ◽  
Frank Lampe ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 2333-2342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos J. Marques ◽  
Tobias Martin ◽  
Franziska Fiedler ◽  
Mathias Weber ◽  
Viktor Breul ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 1373-1380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Kochman ◽  
Adrian Goral ◽  
Tobias Martin ◽  
Wojciech Marek ◽  
Josef Kozak ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii109-iii110
Author(s):  
C. de Quintana Schmidt ◽  
A. Leidinger ◽  
O. Gallego ◽  
B. Gomez ◽  
J. Craven ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document