Comparison of image quality of head and neck lesions between 3D gradient echo sequences with compressed sensing and the multi-slice spin echo sequence

Background Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent soft-tissue contrast, long acquisition times are major disadvantages. Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of compressed sensing (CS) for contrast-enhanced oral and maxillofacial MRI by comparing the 3D T1 turbo field echo with compressed SENSE (CS-3D-T1TFE) sequence with the multi-slice spin echo (MS-SE) sequence as the reference standard. Material and Methods Thirty patients with orofacial lesions participated in this study. The scan times for MS-SE and CS-3D-T1TFE were 5 min 56 s and 1 min 43 s, respectively. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated for quantitative analysis and seven parameters (degree of lesion conspicuity, motion artifacts, metal artifacts, pulsation artifacts, quality of fat suppression, homogeneity of blood vessel signal intensity, and overall image quality) were evaluated using a 5-point scale (5 = excellent, 1 = unacceptable) by two observers for qualitative analysis. For comparisons between MS-SE and CS-3D-T1TFE, the paired t-test was used. Results The SNR of CS-3D-T1TFE was higher than or equal to that of MS-SE. The CS-3D-T1TFE scores for motion artifacts, pulsation artifacts, and homogeneity of blood vessel signal intensity were higher than the corresponding MS-SE scores in assessments by both observers. The MS-SE scores for fat suppression were higher than or equal to the CS-3D-T1TFE scores. There were no significant differences in lesion conspicuity, metal artifacts, and overall image quality between the two sequences. Conclusion CS-3D-T1TFE imaging, less than 30% of the scan time for MS-SE, showed no image degradation while retaining equal or higher SNR and image quality.

An evaluation of in vivo voltage-sensitive dyes: pharmacological side effects and signal-to-noise ratios after effective removal of brain-pulsation artifacts

In the current study, we investigated pharmacological side effects and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of two commonly used voltage-sensitive dyes (VSDs): the blue dye RH-1691 (1 mg/ml) and the red dye di-4-ANEPPS (0.1 mg/ml), applied in vivo to the rat barrel cortex. Blue dyes are often favored over red dyes in in vivo studies due to their apparent superior SNR, partly because their fluorescence spectrum is farther away from the hemoglobin absorption spectrum, making them less prone to heartbeat-associated brain-pulsation artifacts (BPA). We implemented a previously reported template-based BPA removal algorithm and evaluated its applicability to di-4-ANEPPS before comparing characteristics of the two dyes. Somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) were also recorded. Whereas SEPs recorded before and after application of di-4-ANEPPS failed to exhibit demonstrable differences, RH-1691 caused a significant and prolonged increase in SEP amplitude for several hours. In contrast, neither dye influenced the spontaneous cortical activity as assessed by the spectral content of the EEG. Both dyes turned out to be strikingly similar with respect to changes in fractional fluorescence as a function of SEP response amplitude, as well as regarding shot noise characteristics after removal of the BPA. Thus there is strong evidence that the increased SNR for RH-1691 is a consequence of an artificially increased signal. When applying an appropriate BPA removal algorithm, di-4-ANEPPS has proven to be suitable for single-trial in vivo VSD imaging (VSDI) and produces no detectable neurophysiological changes in the system under investigation. Taken together, our data argue for a careful re-evaluation of pharmacological side effects of RH-1691 and support the applicability of di-4-ANEPPS for stable single-trial in vivo VSDI recordings.